Homeopathy/PreviousVersion: Revision history

13 May 2009

• curprev 01:5001:50, 13 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ m 94,729 bytes +4‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy: wikilink aspirin
• curprev 01:3701:37, 13 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,725 bytes −872‎ extended source of ref. 9 and added it also to "complaints of double standards" .
• curprev 00:5000:50, 13 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,539 bytes +24‎ added "advice", because wasn't clear whether director's objection was against drugs or against advice, repl dead link by ref to section. Repl it by hom in new para

12 May 2009

• curprev 23:2723:27, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 94,515 bytes −1,155‎ Moved von Behring to history of homeopathy. What about mithridization?
• curprev 22:5622:56, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,525 bytes −145‎ fiddling with the lede; "which" is correct in this context
• curprev 22:3622:36, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 95,494 bytes −176‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy: too much distracting detail with Avogadro's number etc (much less its German translation!)
• curprev 21:4121:41, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 95,670 bytes +73‎ Still fiddling, but moving basic principles of similars and ultradilution into the lede
• curprev 21:2221:22, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,597 bytes 0‎ →‎Safety: first word sould be in caps, since it's in the text of the article
• curprev 21:2121:21, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,597 bytes +62,790‎ I'll quit trying to get rid of extraneous white space -- geez, i dunno what happens then!
• curprev 21:1821:18, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ m 95,594 bytes +62,787‎ Reverted edits by Hayford Peirce (Talk) to last version by Raymond Arritt
• curprev 21:1821:18, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 32,807 bytes −62,790‎ →‎Overview: removed some white space
• curprev 21:1021:10, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,597 bytes +94‎ →‎Safety: I refuse to believe, accept, or permit on this page, "many public health officials believe etc." - it is "nearly all" or they would not be public health professionals. Are we men or mice?
• curprev 21:0721:07, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,591 bytes 0‎ Undo revision 100487335 by Hayford Peirce (Talk) somehow screwed things up
• curprev 21:0421:04, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 8,760 bytes −86,831‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy: removed some white space
• curprev 21:0321:03, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,591 bytes −2‎ →‎Safety: in sentence one we have "some", then in sentence two, "many", not really the same thing. I have changed "Many" to "These". If you think that "some" should be replaced by "many", go ahead.
• curprev 20:5720:57, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,593 bytes 0‎ →‎Conflict with conventional medicine: capitalized a link
• curprev 20:5520:55, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,593 bytes +199‎ →‎The claims for homeopathy: changed a which to that -- how did I miss that one earlier?
• curprev 19:2819:28, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 95,594 bytes +23‎ →‎The claims for homeopathy: readability, grammar; style - clarify contrast of "minor", "long term" and "major"
• curprev 19:2119:21, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 95,571 bytes +3‎ →‎Overview: minor copyedits
• curprev 17:1517:15, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 95,568 bytes −54‎ →‎Overview: tighten text with no (intended) change of meaning
• curprev 11:2711:27, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,622 bytes 0‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy: removed a little unnecessary white space
• curprev 02:1602:16, 12 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 95,622 bytes +228‎ Moved homeopathy advertisement from Scientific basis to Overview; commented out paragraph about regular science (had nothing to say about homeopathy).

11 May 2009

• curprev 12:4912:49, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 95,398 bytes −1‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy: "day", singular, is correct in this context
• curprev 10:4010:40, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 95,399 bytes +5‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy
• curprev 10:3610:36, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ m 95,418 bytes +24‎ →‎Attempts to provide a scientific foundation for homeopathy
• curprev 10:3010:30, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 95,394 bytes −109‎ rephrased first sentences to increase readability
• curprev 10:1910:19, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 95,503 bytes +59,897‎ →‎Attempts to scientific foundation of homeopathy: grammar
• curprev 07:2107:21, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ m 95,493 bytes +1,040‎ →‎Attempts to scientific foundation of homeopathy
• curprev 02:2102:21, 11 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 95,446 bytes +993‎ →‎Scientific basis of homeopathy: changed title, added reference and doi's, small rewrite.

10 May 2009

• curprev 14:4814:48, 10 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 94,453 bytes +58,847‎ changed "in" to "within", which, I think, is probably more correct
• curprev 14:4214:42, 10 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 94,449 bytes +279‎ No edit summary
• curprev 01:0701:07, 10 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,170 bytes +880‎ →‎Scientific basis of homeopathy: Commented out a sentence + ref; sentence + ref must go elsewhere

9 May 2009

• curprev 16:1216:12, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 94,048 bytes +21‎ Raymond, you simply returned it to essentially what it was before, and what we have been working on for several days now to change. A number of us agreed that the old version had to be changed....
• curprev 15:5715:57, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 94,030 bytes +3‎ flow
• curprev 15:5515:55, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 94,027 bytes −21‎ rearrange
• curprev 05:3805:38, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 94,048 bytes −45‎ removed "mainstream" everywhere; commented out the irrelevant paragraph on "scientists may have it wrong"
• curprev 05:2905:29, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 94,093 bytes +566‎ →‎Overview
• curprev 05:2405:24, 9 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,147 bytes +620‎ →‎Scientific basis of homeopathy: Rewrite to make it less biased

8 May 2009

• curprev 14:2514:25, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 93,527 bytes +237‎ I hate multiple citations in a row, unbroken by text
• curprev 14:0014:00, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 93,315 bytes +7‎ added a word
• curprev 13:5913:59, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 93,308 bytes +18‎ rewriting to get rid of "if not", which is one of my pet bugaboos
• curprev 13:5613:56, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 93,290 bytes +57,684‎ removed duplicate sentence in lede
• curprev 13:2513:25, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 93,407 bytes +1,059‎ Revised lede, moved warning paragraph to intro
• curprev 12:5112:51, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 92,428 bytes +1‎ Rewrote that *long* lede sentence so that it has become *three* sentences
• curprev 12:4912:49, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 92,413 bytes −14‎ I think those emdashes should be commas
• curprev 12:1212:12, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 92,427 bytes +79‎ Moved disclaimer a bit higher but added transition
• curprev 07:0407:04, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Daniel Mietchen‎ 92,348 bytes +7‎ restructured a sentence; do we have a reference for the "30-40% of French doctors and 20% of German doctors" and the "national system" in India?
• curprev 07:0007:00, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 92,341 bytes −138‎ →‎Overview: tightening
• curprev 06:5506:55, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 92,479 bytes −106‎ →‎Overview: probably shouldn't pander to celebrity endorsement
• curprev 06:5306:53, 8 May 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 92,585 bytes −6‎ should heve been stated explicitly