Homeopathy/PreviousVersion: Revision history

8 June 2009

• curprev 22:2722:27, 8 June 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 95,124 bytes −319‎ →‎Homeopathic manufacture of remedies: protect integrity of direct quote.. see talk

7 June 2009

• curprev 17:2617:26, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,443 bytes −51‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: As per Talk page...this topic is more accurate for this section.
• curprev 17:2317:23, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,435 bytes +14‎ →‎Conflict with conventional medicine: Changed "implausible" to improbable and unconvincing, as per Talk page
• curprev 17:1517:15, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,421 bytes −681‎ →‎The claims for homeopathy: There is no clear reason to discuss gangrene here.
• curprev 17:0217:02, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,821 bytes −281‎ →‎Similia similibus curentur : the law of similars: Deletion of paragraph, as per Talk, and reference to homeopathy & immune response.
• curprev 16:5016:50, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 96,102 bytes +330‎ →‎Similia similibus curentur : the law of similars: Hormesis referenced...and grammar improved
• curprev 16:4216:42, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,772 bytes +278‎ →‎Homeopathic manufacture of remedies: Safety and regulation of homeopathic medicines
• curprev 11:5511:55, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,379 bytes 0‎ Let's be precise/accurate. "Centuries old" is too vague.
• curprev 11:5311:53, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,379 bytes −115‎ Not true...also used by other healers/physicians of various sorts
• curprev 09:2709:27, 7 June 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 95,494 bytes 0‎ give or take
• curprev 09:2009:20, 7 June 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 95,494 bytes 0‎ This doesn't make sense
• curprev 06:0506:05, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,494 bytes +93‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:0006:00, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,388 bytes −16‎ cannot have observed all instances of a law, so replaced statement is false
• curprev 05:5805:58, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,404 bytes −56‎ →‎Overview: this is a general statement and fraud is always an option
• curprev 05:5705:57, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,460 bytes −66‎ →‎Overview: a, this is a definition, b) there's massive evidence for widespread publication bias throughout the scientific literature
• curprev 05:5605:56, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,526 bytes −9‎ →‎Overview: no, they are interested in why people believe things they think are irrational
• curprev 05:5305:53, 7 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 95,535 bytes −179‎ →‎Overview: Darwinwas a skeptic who nevertheless tried and dismissed it, but lets avoid celebrity pleading

6 June 2009

• curprev 14:5214:52, 6 June 2009‎ imported>Howard C. Berkowitz‎ 95,714 bytes −452‎ Moved Behring to talk page
• curprev 14:4714:47, 6 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 96,166 bytes +203‎ →‎Similia similibus curentur : the law of similars: Refinement, typo, and reference to von Behring's quote. I can provide the exact quote if requested.

5 June 2009

• curprev 23:0723:07, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,862 bytes −101‎ →‎Homeopathic "provings": Deleted redundant statement that was repeated in the following paragraph
• curprev 23:0123:01, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,963 bytes −58‎ →‎Historical origins: More clarity about which schools were homeopathic.
• curprev 22:5622:56, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 96,021 bytes +503‎ →‎Historical origins: Proper potentization info
• curprev 22:5122:51, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,908 bytes +390‎ →‎Historical origins: Correction to drug proving info
• curprev 22:4422:44, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,658 bytes +140‎ →‎Historical origins: More precision about Hippocrates...will try to find references soon.
• curprev 22:3922:39, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,518 bytes +117‎ →‎Overview: More precision
• curprev 22:2922:29, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,401 bytes +4,789‎ →‎Overview: More specificity
• curprev 20:3520:35, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 95,086 bytes +413‎ The "implausibility" issue was previously mentioned. Updated some statistics on usage.
• curprev 20:1320:13, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 94,673 bytes +413‎ Refinement to 2nd paragraph, while maintaining the both sides.
• curprev 20:0520:05, 5 June 2009‎ imported>Dana Ullman‎ 94,260 bytes +56‎ Refinement of opening paragraph...note that Hahnemann recognized germs in 1830s!
• curprev 18:4818:48, 5 June 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 94,204 bytes +54‎ Agree that principle of similars is more relative than vital force, try this

2 June 2009

• curprev 03:1603:16, 2 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 94,150 bytes +82‎ "classified as"? seems unneccessary
• curprev 03:1303:13, 2 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 94,164 bytes +96‎ rephrase lede to correct error re dilution, and issues in Talk. This correct Dana?
• curprev 03:0603:06, 2 June 2009‎ imported>Gareth Leng‎ 94,048 bytes −20‎ "as an alternative health system" - carries no meaning here, reword

30 May 2009

• curprev 08:4508:45, 30 May 2009‎ imported>Caesar Schinas‎ m 94,068 bytes 0‎ Robot: Changing template: TOC-right
• curprev 03:0303:03, 30 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,068 bytes +3,456‎ Gareth and I did a literature search to check the 20/30-40% for German/French physicans. See the section "who are they" for the numbers that we found. Definitely not 20/30-45, that's why I removed it

29 May 2009

• curprev 23:0323:03, 29 May 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 94,112 bytes +51‎ maybe more liek this
• curprev 22:5922:59, 29 May 2009‎ imported>D. Matt Innis‎ 93,913 bytes −148‎ try this

26 May 2009

• curprev 05:0105:01, 26 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,061 bytes 0‎ →‎Professional homeopaths: who are they?: small reshuffle
• curprev 04:3804:38, 26 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 94,061 bytes +3,394‎ →‎Professional homeopaths: who are they?: a few extra refs; rm of unreferenced percentages; minor rewrite/reshuffle

25 May 2009

• curprev 08:5908:59, 25 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ 90,667 bytes +55‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: Loschmidt back

24 May 2009

• curprev 11:1211:12, 24 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,390 bytes +6‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: not always
• curprev 11:0511:05, 24 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,384 bytes −116‎ →‎Medical organizations' attitudes towards homeopathy: characterizations and value judgments such as this have no place in a reference work

23 May 2009

• curprev 12:5212:52, 23 May 2009‎ imported>Hayford Peirce‎ 90,450 bytes −50‎ As one of the resident English gurus, I'm putting that "however" back in -- trust me on this, that is the way it should be written
• curprev 12:1512:15, 23 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,440 bytes −60‎ →‎Conflict with conventional medicine: simpler language; rm judgmental tone
• curprev 09:1609:16, 23 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,500 bytes +90‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: this most basic point is somehow neglected
• curprev 09:1409:14, 23 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,410 bytes −202‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: more explicit statement of results
• curprev 09:0709:07, 23 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,470 bytes −142‎ →‎Proposed scientific foundations for homeopathy: how is the *size* of atoms relevant?

22 May 2009

• curprev 10:5410:54, 22 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,612 bytes −4,891‎ rm "however" - the point/counterpoint style of presentation is not necessarily helpful
• curprev 08:4108:41, 22 May 2009‎ imported>Raymond Arritt‎ 90,622 bytes +100‎ this essential point must be mentioned in the lead

17 May 2009

• curprev 03:4303:43, 17 May 2009‎ imported>Paul Wormer‎ m 90,523 bytes +1‎ →‎Homeopathic "provings": Closing bracket