Talk:Open access: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DavidGoodman (please keep) |
imported>Petréa Mitchell (Big Cleanup checklist) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{checklist | |||
| abc = Open access | |||
| cat1 = Library and Information Science | |||
| cat2 = | |||
| cat3 = | |||
| cat_check = n | |||
| status = 4 | |||
| underlinked = n | |||
| cleanup = y | |||
| by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 09:47, 31 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
}} | |||
As obvious, this was written based entirely on one particular person's POV in the most transparent manner imaginable. | As obvious, this was written based entirely on one particular person's POV in the most transparent manner imaginable. | ||
Some totally non-encyclopedic parts have been removed, but go see them in Wikipedia, because they are clever, as would be expected from it author. I'd like to try to edit it to keep some of the style, but it may be impossible. Id rather someone worked on it other than myself, because I have written 2 reviews on the subject & I fear I will sound the same. (& its not as if I were unprejudiced myself) [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 23:41, 21 November 2006 (CST) | Some totally non-encyclopedic parts have been removed, but go see them in Wikipedia, because they are clever, as would be expected from it author. I'd like to try to edit it to keep some of the style, but it may be impossible. Id rather someone worked on it other than myself, because I have written 2 reviews on the subject & I fear I will sound the same. (& its not as if I were unprejudiced myself) [[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 23:41, 21 November 2006 (CST) | ||
::meanwhile please keep, it is better than the present WP article.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:27, 18 February 2007 (CST) | ::meanwhile please keep, it is better than the present WP article.[[User:DavidGoodman|DavidGoodman]] 21:27, 18 February 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 08:47, 31 March 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Library and Information Science Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Petréa Mitchell 09:47, 31 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
As obvious, this was written based entirely on one particular person's POV in the most transparent manner imaginable. Some totally non-encyclopedic parts have been removed, but go see them in Wikipedia, because they are clever, as would be expected from it author. I'd like to try to edit it to keep some of the style, but it may be impossible. Id rather someone worked on it other than myself, because I have written 2 reviews on the subject & I fear I will sound the same. (& its not as if I were unprejudiced myself) DavidGoodman 23:41, 21 November 2006 (CST)
- meanwhile please keep, it is better than the present WP article.DavidGoodman 21:27, 18 February 2007 (CST)
Categories:
- Library and Information Science Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Library and Information Science Advanced Articles
- Library and Information Science Nonstub Articles
- Library and Information Science Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Library and Information Science Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Library and Information Science Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Library and Information Science Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Library and Information Science External Articles
- Library and Information Science Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Library and Information Science Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup