User talk:Anthony.Sebastian: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews (→Redirect of Biological mathematics: new section) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Electric charge: new section) |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Hi Anthony: | Hi Anthony: | ||
I've moved the article [[Biological mathematics]] to [[Biological computation]], which seems to me to fit the content of this article pretty well. Please excuse my doing this before your have had a chance to comment upon it. I don't think it is a very controversial change, but it may be a bit startling to find what has happened in your absence. If so, my apologies. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 18:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC) | I've moved the article [[Biological mathematics]] to [[Biological computation]], which seems to me to fit the content of this article pretty well. Please excuse my doing this before your have had a chance to comment upon it. I don't think it is a very controversial change, but it may be a bit startling to find what has happened in your absence. If so, my apologies. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 18:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Electric charge == | |||
Anthony: If you take a look at [[Talk:Electric_charge#Definition_of_electric_charge]] you will see that while technically you are right that the article [[Electric charge]] should begin with a definition of ''electric'' charge, that approach is awkward, and the simple change you have made in the lead sentence of this article does not solve the problem. | |||
There seems to me to be two possibilities: the one you object to that begins by defining charge and then defines electric charge and how it is distinct from magnetic charge. Alternatively, one can make a new article [[Charge]], describing ''a fundamental property of [[matter]] that causes matter having that property to generate and react to a [[force]] of attraction or repulsion to spatially separate matter that likewise manifests the property of charge.'' | |||
Then one can refer to this article in the article [[Electric charge]] as ''one of the two known types of charge, ''magnetic'' and ''electric'', with the distinguishing property that electric charges can be isolated, while while an isolated magnetic charge or [[magnetic monopole]] never has been observed.'' | |||
In any event, I find the present arrangement unsatisfactory. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 04:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:09, 12 August 2011
Where Anthony lives it is approximately: 03:55
Creating my User Talk Page. --Anthony.Sebastian
Anthony.Sebastian (Talk) 13:48, 19 December 2006 (CST)
Current UTC Time: +7 hours
Current UTC Time: 10:55
Now: 01:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
To Approve articles | Diberri citation maker | Help Wikiformatting | Citizendium Test Wiki | CZ:How to use Bugzilla |
Please review Los Alamos National Laboratory for spelling, grammar, and whatever
Anthony, I would very much appreciate it if you would review Los Alamos National Laboratory for spelling, grammar, and whatever else you think may be needed. Let me have your comments on the article's Talk page. Thanks, Milton Beychok 20:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi Anthony
Back after a holiday - I take it I'm not still needed for Alcmeion?Gareth Leng 08:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, Gareth. Alcmaeon (a.k.a., Alkmaion): Approved. Hope you enjoyed your vacation, though you may have meant 'vacation from CZ'. OMBs need such. Anthony.Sebastian 22:31, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Asking for your help again
Anthony, the Project Apollo article needs a critical review by a History author like yourself. See here the documentation of my recent extensive edits to that article.
Anything you can do to make it more readable, more interesting, etc. would be appreciated. Milton Beychok 04:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Milton, I have a few deadlines related to academic year ending. I took a look at Project Apollo and will plan to work on it starting sometime in July, though the start of the academic year also puts demands on me.
- Thanks for steering me in the article's direction. The Apollo missions were incredible achievements. Anthony.Sebastian 14:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Anthony, thanks for your added references and edits as well as for picking up my goof in defining "billion". Milton Beychok 21:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Redirect of Biological mathematics
Hi Anthony: I've moved the article Biological mathematics to Biological computation, which seems to me to fit the content of this article pretty well. Please excuse my doing this before your have had a chance to comment upon it. I don't think it is a very controversial change, but it may be a bit startling to find what has happened in your absence. If so, my apologies. John R. Brews 18:51, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Electric charge
Anthony: If you take a look at Talk:Electric_charge#Definition_of_electric_charge you will see that while technically you are right that the article Electric charge should begin with a definition of electric charge, that approach is awkward, and the simple change you have made in the lead sentence of this article does not solve the problem.
There seems to me to be two possibilities: the one you object to that begins by defining charge and then defines electric charge and how it is distinct from magnetic charge. Alternatively, one can make a new article Charge, describing a fundamental property of matter that causes matter having that property to generate and react to a force of attraction or repulsion to spatially separate matter that likewise manifests the property of charge.
Then one can refer to this article in the article Electric charge as one of the two known types of charge, magnetic and electric, with the distinguishing property that electric charges can be isolated, while while an isolated magnetic charge or magnetic monopole never has been observed.
In any event, I find the present arrangement unsatisfactory. John R. Brews 04:09, 13 August 2011 (UTC)