User talk:Sean McCreary: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD No edit summary |
imported>Robert Tito m (protect or not) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sean, you don't need to be part of a workgroup to edit. Don't worry. I'd say take a look (browse live articles) and if you see something that interests you, read it. If you think of an addition that you find helpful, add it. If you disagree with something, rather than just delete it,( although you ''could'' do so without upsetting anyone if you put your reasons down in the summary as you save the new version), everybody has gotten most comfortable with talking it out on the discussion page, and making proposals- this is how I would change it- what do you think- sorts of things. Even the most degree laden among us write as authors in fields where we are not experts-but have interests. So go on, join us! [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 14:12, 24 January 2007 (CST) | Sean, you don't need to be part of a workgroup to edit. Don't worry. I'd say take a look (browse live articles) and if you see something that interests you, read it. If you think of an addition that you find helpful, add it. If you disagree with something, rather than just delete it,( although you ''could'' do so without upsetting anyone if you put your reasons down in the summary as you save the new version), everybody has gotten most comfortable with talking it out on the discussion page, and making proposals- this is how I would change it- what do you think- sorts of things. Even the most degree laden among us write as authors in fields where we are not experts-but have interests. So go on, join us! [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 14:12, 24 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== protect or not == | |||
Hello Mr. McCreary | |||
Your remark is true, but protecting it would also mean only constables van edit that page. That is something not wanted (I think I speak on behalf of all constabkles if I say) by us, nor wanted by contributing authors and editors. | |||
We do have some vandals - as everywhere. If needed for a period we DO block the pages that are of interest of the vandals. | |||
Regards and thank you for your remark. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] 17:14, 31 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 17:14, 31 January 2007
We are glad to have you look around, and hope that you like what you see. What are your interests?Nancy Sculerati MD 13:43, 24 January 2007 (CST)
Sean, you don't need to be part of a workgroup to edit. Don't worry. I'd say take a look (browse live articles) and if you see something that interests you, read it. If you think of an addition that you find helpful, add it. If you disagree with something, rather than just delete it,( although you could do so without upsetting anyone if you put your reasons down in the summary as you save the new version), everybody has gotten most comfortable with talking it out on the discussion page, and making proposals- this is how I would change it- what do you think- sorts of things. Even the most degree laden among us write as authors in fields where we are not experts-but have interests. So go on, join us! Nancy Sculerati MD 14:12, 24 January 2007 (CST)
protect or not
Hello Mr. McCreary Your remark is true, but protecting it would also mean only constables van edit that page. That is something not wanted (I think I speak on behalf of all constabkles if I say) by us, nor wanted by contributing authors and editors. We do have some vandals - as everywhere. If needed for a period we DO block the pages that are of interest of the vandals. Regards and thank you for your remark. Robert Tito 17:14, 31 January 2007 (CST)