User talk:Grant Sparks: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 32: Line 32:
:: Hi Stephen.  I will of course comply with the decision but I disagree with the choice of media you suggest, as posted [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Larry_Sanger#Online_Identity_Verification_for_Collaborative_Communities here].  The information being presented in this article is of interest to the citizens of citizendium so give me a couple of days (or maybe some help?) to re-write it in whatever manner will make you think it looks more like an encyclopedia article, rather than making these arbitrary decisions on what topics we can write articles about.  This topic is a good one that will be a useful reference for the upcoming (ongoing) debate on technology solutions for the real-names policy.
:: Hi Stephen.  I will of course comply with the decision but I disagree with the choice of media you suggest, as posted [http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/User_talk:Larry_Sanger#Online_Identity_Verification_for_Collaborative_Communities here].  The information being presented in this article is of interest to the citizens of citizendium so give me a couple of days (or maybe some help?) to re-write it in whatever manner will make you think it looks more like an encyclopedia article, rather than making these arbitrary decisions on what topics we can write articles about.  This topic is a good one that will be a useful reference for the upcoming (ongoing) debate on technology solutions for the real-names policy.


::: I don't doubt that the interest is of interest to CZ.  That's not the issue.  Either there is a body of research and practice about this topic already in existence, or there isn't.  I don't know if there is, but frankly I doubt it.  But if there is, then you can draw on that in re-writing the article, as you suggest.  But if there is not, then there is not a body of knowledge for you to sum up, and you shouldn't write an encyclopedia article pretending that it does exist; that's called "original research."  So what would be nice is if you would address the issue whather it is possible to write the article without doing original research.  If not, then it doesn't belong on the wiki, period. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:55, 27 February 2007 (CST)
::: I don't doubt that the interest is of interest to CZ.  That's not the issue.  Either there is a body of research and practice about this topic already in existence, or there isn't.  I don't know if there is, but frankly I doubt it.  But if there is, then you can draw on that in re-writing the article, as you suggest.  But if there is not, then there is not a body of knowledge for you to sum up, and you shouldn't write an encyclopedia article pretending that it does exist; that's called "original research."  So what would be nice is if you would address the issue of whether it is possible to write the article without doing original research.  If not, then it doesn't belong on the wiki, period. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:55, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 14:55, 27 February 2007

Welcome

Citizendium Getting Started
Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians  


Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitionsadd metadata • edit new pages

Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!

You can find some more information about our collaboration groups if you follow this link Citizendium_Pilot:Discipline_Workgroups.You can always ask me on my talk page or others about how to proceed or any other question you might have.


Kind Regards, Robert Tito | Talk 11:57, 14 February 2007 (CST)

A pleasure to be here

Thanks for your kind welcome Robert! Grant Sparks


Hi!

Hi, Grant, I saw your introduction—unfortunately, I had to remove it because you inadvertantly posted it to an archive of old discussions. I suggest that a better place to post this comment would be on the forum for the relgion workgroup. Welcome aboard! Nat Krause 13:18, 19 February 2007 (CST)


Thanks!

Thanks Nat. I'll be sure to come on over to the forums and get involved with the workgroup. Grant Sparks

Learning

Apparently signing our names like this is uber-kewl -> --Grant Sparks 07:29, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Online Identity Verification for Collaborative Communities

Hi Grant. I am a constable here at Citizendium. Thanks for the really interesting information at Online Identity Verification for Collaborative Communities, an issue you are apparently aware we have been pondering to one degree or another here. I hope you got some practice using wiki markup to create the piece. However, since it really is not an encyclopedia article, the content best belongs at the Forums and deleted from here. I will give you a day or two to move it before I delete it. Please don't be off put by this. I hope to see you around authoring articles! Stephen Ewen 14:31, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Hi Stephen. I will of course comply with the decision but I disagree with the choice of media you suggest, as posted here. The information being presented in this article is of interest to the citizens of citizendium so give me a couple of days (or maybe some help?) to re-write it in whatever manner will make you think it looks more like an encyclopedia article, rather than making these arbitrary decisions on what topics we can write articles about. This topic is a good one that will be a useful reference for the upcoming (ongoing) debate on technology solutions for the real-names policy.
I don't doubt that the interest is of interest to CZ. That's not the issue. Either there is a body of research and practice about this topic already in existence, or there isn't. I don't know if there is, but frankly I doubt it. But if there is, then you can draw on that in re-writing the article, as you suggest. But if there is not, then there is not a body of knowledge for you to sum up, and you shouldn't write an encyclopedia article pretending that it does exist; that's called "original research." So what would be nice is if you would address the issue of whether it is possible to write the article without doing original research. If not, then it doesn't belong on the wiki, period. --Larry Sanger 14:55, 27 February 2007 (CST)