Talk:Pike (programming language): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos (checklist) |
imported>Pat Palmer m (Talk:Pike (programming language) moved to Talk:Pike programming language: difficult to link if parentheses) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:04, 25 April 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Computers Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | External article: from another source, with little change |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | --AlekStos 12:28, 16 March 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
I thought I spoke them all, this one is a newbie for me. Cool. You check APL, hehe see if you know that one. :) Robert Tito | Talk 22:41, 23 February 2007 (CST)
the big write
Is it ok, if Pike will be one of the branches of programming languages? as well as any other progr. lang of course. It will unite every language we can come up with for computers. If you like it, add your name as one of the authors please. Robert Tito | Talk 14:35, 24 February 2007 (CST)
Categories:
- Computers Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Computers Advanced Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Computers Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Computers Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Computers External Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup