User talk:Dan Nachbar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell Potter (Looking at Engineering entries for approval nomination) |
imported>Russell Potter |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hi Dan, | Hi Dan, | ||
I'm looking to see if we might have any entries in the Engineering workgroup that might be ready to be nominated for Approval -- if you would have a look at [[Coherer]] and [[John Logie Baird]], I'd be grateful. If they seem like entries you'd consider nominating, I'd be additionally grateful, as there are relatively few active editors in the area at the moment. Best regards, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 17:17, 6 July 2007 (CDT) (Assistant Approvals Management Editor) | I'm looking to see if we might have any entries in the Engineering workgroup that might be ready to be nominated for Approval -- if you would have a look at [[Coherer]], [[Guglielmo Marconi]], and [[John Logie Baird]], I'd be grateful. If they seem like entries you'd consider nominating, I'd be additionally grateful, as there are relatively few active editors in the area at the moment. Best regards, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 17:17, 6 July 2007 (CDT) (Assistant Approvals Management Editor) | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 6 July 2007
You can leave messages here by clicking on the "+" tab above.
Thank you
Thank you for your help and advice Big Dan. Paul Austin 22:42, 6 June 2007 (CDT)
Looking at Engineering entries for approval nomination
Hi Dan,
I'm looking to see if we might have any entries in the Engineering workgroup that might be ready to be nominated for Approval -- if you would have a look at Coherer, Guglielmo Marconi, and John Logie Baird, I'd be grateful. If they seem like entries you'd consider nominating, I'd be additionally grateful, as there are relatively few active editors in the area at the moment. Best regards, Russell Potter 17:17, 6 July 2007 (CDT) (Assistant Approvals Management Editor)