Talk:Particle in a box: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael Underwood (Do we need the 3D case?) |
imported>Michael Underwood No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
well? It is definitely important but perhaps a separate page for it would serve to keep this page simpler, as well as making it | well? It is definitely important but perhaps a separate page for it would serve to keep this page simpler, as well as making it | ||
nearly done. | nearly done. | ||
[[User:Michael Underwood|Michael Underwood]] 20:50, 4 July 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 19:50, 4 July 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Physics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | No |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Michael Underwood 18:39, 8 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Do we need the 3D case?
I think this page is starting to approach complete, besides the currently empty sections on the 3D spherical and cubic wells. I believe that the cubic will isn't really needed, but what are people's thoughts on the spherical well? It is definitely important but perhaps a separate page for it would serve to keep this page simpler, as well as making it nearly done.
Michael Underwood 20:50, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Physics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Physics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Physics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Physics External Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup