Talk:Particle in a box: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Michael Underwood |
imported>Pieter Kuiper |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::I agree, I was getting ready to move the spherical well to its own page anyway and have now done so. [[User:Michael Underwood|Michael Underwood]] 14:31, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ::I agree, I was getting ready to move the spherical well to its own page anyway and have now done so. [[User:Michael Underwood|Michael Underwood]] 14:31, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::Excellent. I made the animation that I was thinking of, and I put it in below your image, but that is probably not the best place. Of course one should write an explanation, but I do not have the time now. /[[User:Pieter Kuiper|Pieter Kuiper]] 17:36, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:36, 23 October 2007
Do we need the 3D case?
I think this page is starting to approach complete, besides the currently empty sections on the 3D spherical and cubic wells. I believe that the cubic will isn't really needed, but what are people's thoughts on the spherical well? It is definitely important but perhaps a separate page for it would serve to keep this page simpler, as well as making it nearly done.
Michael Underwood 20:50, 4 July 2007 (CDT)
- The simplest 3D case is a cube, which is worth treating here. The ball case is an exercise in spherical coordinates, maybe better suited for a different article. What I would like to do here is to make an animation of the probability density of a simple non-stationary state. /Pieter Kuiper 04:13, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- I agree, I was getting ready to move the spherical well to its own page anyway and have now done so. Michael Underwood 14:31, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- Excellent. I made the animation that I was thinking of, and I put it in below your image, but that is probably not the best place. Of course one should write an explanation, but I do not have the time now. /Pieter Kuiper 17:36, 23 October 2007 (CDT)