Talk:Cattle/Popular culture: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Nancy Sculerati |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:What about Ferdinand the Bull? I remember that being an animated story.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:18, 1 June 2007 (CDT) | :What about Ferdinand the Bull? I remember that being an animated story.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:18, 1 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
Bulls should be a separate article, I think. The biological creatures may be the same species, but the bull in poular culture is an entirely different animal than the cow in popular culture.[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 09:31, 1 June 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 08:31, 1 June 2007
http://www.aurochs.org/cows/famous/
Cows, Cows AND Bulls, Or Bovine in popular culture?
What say you? Stephen Ewen 19:57, 31 May 2007 (CDT)
Actually, I think it's cows, cattle and bulls. Bulls are only used for breeding and breaking bones at rodeos. Greg Woodhouse 08:47, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
- What about Ferdinand the Bull? I remember that being an animated story.--Robert W King 09:18, 1 June 2007 (CDT)
Bulls should be a separate article, I think. The biological creatures may be the same species, but the bull in poular culture is an entirely different animal than the cow in popular culture.Nancy Sculerati 09:31, 1 June 2007 (CDT)