Talk:Mercury (disambiguation): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito
m (this seems ok)
imported>John Stephenson
(Why are requested the delete)
Line 4: Line 4:


to have disambiguation, as chemistry will have a mercury article, astronomy as well no doubt, and the mercury space project is famous. so speedy delete seems not appropriate. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:grey">&nbsp;<font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span> 18:38, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
to have disambiguation, as chemistry will have a mercury article, astronomy as well no doubt, and the mercury space project is famous. so speedy delete seems not appropriate. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;<span style="background:grey">&nbsp;<font color="yellow"><b>[[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]]</b></font>&nbsp;</span> 18:38, 3 June 2007 (CDT)
:Fair enough, but here we are two weeks later, and these articles are yet to appear. I just put the delete on because it looked like not much was going on. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:07, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 02:07, 15 June 2007

Speedy deletion contested on the basis of common sense - there is no question whatsoever that at least three of the current redlinks are articles that will be written, probably fairly soon. Brian Dean Abramson 23:07, 2 June 2007 (CDT)

this seems ok

to have disambiguation, as chemistry will have a mercury article, astronomy as well no doubt, and the mercury space project is famous. so speedy delete seems not appropriate. Robert Tito |  Talk  18:38, 3 June 2007 (CDT)

Fair enough, but here we are two weeks later, and these articles are yet to appear. I just put the delete on because it looked like not much was going on. John Stephenson 02:07, 15 June 2007 (CDT)