Talk:Neutrality: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:38, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:38, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
This article merely reflects the "take" that Wikipedia and CZ have toward this subject.  I ought to know, because I was the main explicator of the concept for Wikipedia.  As such, the concept and the sorts of things that you say about it here, Robert, are actually rather idiosyncratic, though they bear a relationship to what has in other contexts been called "neutrality" (or by some cognate terms).
Robert, I recommend that, if you want to do an article on this subject, you actually take a neutral point of view toward its subject!  ;-)  And to do that, you'll probably have to do more research into political/diplomatic neutrality, as well as what legal scholars and philosophers say about impartiality.
"Impartiality" is a closer synonym than "objectivity," in my opinion, but that's just my opinion.
Question: will we have separate articles about each of [[neutrality]], [[impartiality]], [[objectivity]], and [[bias]]?
These and many other things need to be thought through carefully. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:42, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 09:42, 25 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Neutrality"
Workgroup category or categories No categories listed [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Robert W King 09:38, 25 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article merely reflects the "take" that Wikipedia and CZ have toward this subject. I ought to know, because I was the main explicator of the concept for Wikipedia. As such, the concept and the sorts of things that you say about it here, Robert, are actually rather idiosyncratic, though they bear a relationship to what has in other contexts been called "neutrality" (or by some cognate terms).

Robert, I recommend that, if you want to do an article on this subject, you actually take a neutral point of view toward its subject!  ;-) And to do that, you'll probably have to do more research into political/diplomatic neutrality, as well as what legal scholars and philosophers say about impartiality.

"Impartiality" is a closer synonym than "objectivity," in my opinion, but that's just my opinion.

Question: will we have separate articles about each of neutrality, impartiality, objectivity, and bias?

These and many other things need to be thought through carefully. --Larry Sanger 09:42, 25 June 2007 (CDT)