Template talk:Subpages4: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


:Hmm.  Probably not worth the trade off.  Thanks for looking into it. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 14:28, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
:Hmm.  Probably not worth the trade off.  Thanks for looking into it. [[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 14:28, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
== Complicated? ==
Hi Chris,
I think I see what you're after with the info page, but isn't this ultimately too complicated, and too low payoff, to expect people to maintain this information correctly?  That's the problem with all metadata.  It has to be obviously of high usefulness, or people just won't care. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:51, 24 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 00:51, 24 July 2007

I like this much better than the version that sits to the right. Only problem is that there are now two titles in a row plus the title bolded in the opening. This is overkill. Could we enlarge the size of the title in the template and ditch the standard title? I think that would look nice. --Joe Quick (Talk) 00:40, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Hmm. Not quite what I meant. I liked the way the template looked (plus the main article bit). Aesthetically, I'd rather see the default title that automatically appears at the top of the article removed. (Or maybe move the template above the main title?) Are either of these even possible? --Joe Quick (Talk) 01:18, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
Not possible, as far as I know.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:23, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
Apparently, Wikihow has figured out a way to do it.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:30, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
Sorry for the multiple postings. It is a feature of Wikimedia that just has to be enabled, see here and here. Hmm.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 01:34, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

I found a wiki with it enabled, http://www.cyclechaos.com/wiki/Motorcycle_Wiki, made an account, and tested it in a few ways. Main problem: you leave it blank it defaults to the title of the page anyway. Too, it diminishes the functionality of the search feature. When you click "Go" it does not bring you to the article title added to {{DISPLAYTITLE:xyz}} but it does show up in the search. That would require making that trade-off, therefore.  —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 02:02, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Hmm. Probably not worth the trade off. Thanks for looking into it. --Joe Quick (Talk) 14:28, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Complicated?

Hi Chris,

I think I see what you're after with the info page, but isn't this ultimately too complicated, and too low payoff, to expect people to maintain this information correctly? That's the problem with all metadata. It has to be obviously of high usefulness, or people just won't care. --Larry Sanger 00:51, 24 July 2007 (CDT)