Talk:Irrational number: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony Argyriou (reply to Michael Hardy) |
imported>Michael Hardy No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
::They are infinite in number, and in number density. It is believed that the infinity of the number of irrational numbers is a greater infinity than the infinity of the integers, though it's not known if the number of irrationals is properly aleph-1 or not. | ::They are infinite in number, and in number density. It is believed that the infinity of the number of irrational numbers is a greater infinity than the infinity of the integers, though it's not known if the number of irrationals is properly aleph-1 or not. | ||
::Two or three proofs that particular numbers are irrational is not nearly as useful as more in-depth discussion of what exactly irrational numbers ''are'', in general. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 01:13, 4 August 2007 (CDT) | ::Two or three proofs that particular numbers are irrational is not nearly as useful as more in-depth discussion of what exactly irrational numbers ''are'', in general. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 01:13, 4 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
That there are infinitely many of them I suppose I thought was obvious, but certainly that could be added. It is '''known''' that their cardinality is the same as that of the reals and greater than that of the rationals. If you accept the axiom of choice, then that's greater than aleph<sub>1</sub>. As to what they ''are'', that's stated at the beginning. One thing that is useful about the proofs of irrationality is that they show that it's very easy to see why irrational numbers must exist. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 11:25, 4 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:25, 4 August 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | Anthony Argyriou 17:14, 2 August 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article needs stuff on the theory of irrational numbers - that irrational numbers may be algebraic or transcendental, that they are infinite, etc.. Anthony Argyriou 17:14, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
- What in the world do you mean by saying they are infinite? They are nothing of the sort. Michael Hardy 20:08, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- They are infinite in number, and in number density. It is believed that the infinity of the number of irrational numbers is a greater infinity than the infinity of the integers, though it's not known if the number of irrationals is properly aleph-1 or not.
- Two or three proofs that particular numbers are irrational is not nearly as useful as more in-depth discussion of what exactly irrational numbers are, in general. Anthony Argyriou 01:13, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
That there are infinitely many of them I suppose I thought was obvious, but certainly that could be added. It is known that their cardinality is the same as that of the reals and greater than that of the rationals. If you accept the axiom of choice, then that's greater than aleph1. As to what they are, that's stated at the beginning. One thing that is useful about the proofs of irrationality is that they show that it's very easy to see why irrational numbers must exist. Michael Hardy 11:25, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
- Mathematics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Mathematics Advanced Articles
- Mathematics Nonstub Articles
- Mathematics Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Mathematics Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Mathematics Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Mathematics Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Mathematics External Articles
- Mathematics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Mathematics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup