Talk:Economics/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check =  
|          cat_check =  
|              status = 3
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = N
|        underlinked = N
|            cleanup =  
|            cleanup =  
|                  by = --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 18:59, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = --[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 16:40, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}


Line 16: Line 16:
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:47, 23 September 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:47, 23 September 2007 (CDT)


Should this be classified as a stub? The intention was to use it mainly to provide links to other articles. However, I should welcome suggestions as to what should be added.
Should this be classified as a stub?  
::No:-)--[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 16:40, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
The intention was to use it mainly to provide links to other articles. However, I should welcome suggestions as to what should be added.
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:02, 25 September 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 09:02, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:40, 25 September 2007


Article Checklist for "Economics/Draft"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup [Please add or review categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:40, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





First draft completion

For the time being - and subject to the comments - I have nothing further to add to this draft Nick Gardner 09:47, 23 September 2007 (CDT)

Should this be classified as a stub?

No:-)--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 16:40, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

The intention was to use it mainly to provide links to other articles. However, I should welcome suggestions as to what should be added. Nick Gardner 09:02, 25 September 2007 (CDT)