Talk:Symphony/Catalogs/Symphonies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger m (Talk:Symphony/Catalogs/Catalog of Famous Symphonies moved to Talk:Symphony/Catalogs/Famous Symphonies: Department of Redundancy Dept.) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 08:32, 21 October 2007
I don't think the number of the symphony is a good way to list them. I suggest alphabetically by the nicknames, which are quite famous usually. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:12, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
- Won't bother me. I tend to remember more numbers than names, I think, except for the really really famous names. The only think I can think wrong with your idea is that some don't have names. Some sites give more than one list, by composer, by number, by name--honestly I don't mind; whatever people think is best. Aleta Curry 02:20, 21 October 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, the few without names will need numbers, but we could list them at the end. Alternatively, I suppose we could order them by composer, but I think it is more useful by nickname. Let's wait for someone else to comment, before doing anything :-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:24, 21 October 2007 (CDT)