Grothendieck topology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Giovanni Antonio DiMatteo
(adding things)
imported>Joe Quick
m (subpages)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The notion of a ''Grothendieck topology'' or ''site'' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves.  The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin.  
{{subpages}}
The notion of a '''Grothendieck topology''' or '''site'''' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves.  The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin.  


==Definition==
==Definition==
Line 13: Line 14:


#A standard topological space <math>X</math> becomes a category <math>op(X)</math> when you regard the open subsets of <math>X</math> as objects, and morphisms are inclusions.  An open covering of open subsets <math>U</math> clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a [[presheaf]] of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category <math>op(X)</math> into the category of rings.  
#A standard topological space <math>X</math> becomes a category <math>op(X)</math> when you regard the open subsets of <math>X</math> as objects, and morphisms are inclusions.  An open covering of open subsets <math>U</math> clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a [[presheaf]] of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category <math>op(X)</math> into the category of rings.  
#'''The Small Étale Site''' Let <math>S</math> be a scheme. Then the [[category of étale schemes]] over <math>S</math> (i.e., <math>S</math>-schemes <math>X</math> over <math>S</math> whose structural morphisms are étale)
#'''The Small Étale Site''' Let <math>S</math> be a scheme. Then the [[Étale morphism|category of étale schemes]] over <math>S</math> (i.e., <math>S</math>-schemes <math>X</math> over <math>S</math> whose structural morphisms are étale) becomes a site if we require that coverings are jointly surjective; that is,
 


==Sheaves on Sites==
==Sheaves on Sites==
Line 20: Line 20:
In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor  
In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor  
such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram
such that for all coverings <math>\{U_i\to U\}\in cov(T)</math>, the diagram
<math>0\to F(U)\to \Prod F(U_i)\to \Prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math>  
<math>0\to F(U)\to \prod F(U_i)\to \prod F(U_i\times_U U_j)</math>  
is exact.
is exact.
[[Category:CZ Live]]
[[Category:Mathematics Workgroup]]
[[Category:Stub Articles]]

Latest revision as of 04:37, 26 December 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The notion of a Grothendieck topology or site' captures the essential properties necessary for constructing a robust theory of cohomology of sheaves. The theory of Grothendieck topologies was developed by Alexander Grothendieck and Michael Artin.

Definition

A Grothendieck topology consists of

  1. A category, denoted
  2. A set of coverings , denoted , such that
    1. for each object of
    2. If , and is any morphism in , then the canonical morphisms of the fiber products determine a covering
    3. If and , then

Examples

  1. A standard topological space becomes a category when you regard the open subsets of as objects, and morphisms are inclusions. An open covering of open subsets clearly verify the axioms above for coverings in a site. Notice that a presheaf of rings is just a contravariant functor from the category into the category of rings.
  2. The Small Étale Site Let be a scheme. Then the category of étale schemes over (i.e., -schemes over whose structural morphisms are étale) becomes a site if we require that coverings are jointly surjective; that is,

Sheaves on Sites

In analogy with the situation for topological spaces, a presheaf may be defined as a contravariant functor such that for all coverings , the diagram is exact.