Talk:Stellar classification (astrophysics): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
m (+cat)
imported>Michael Geldorp
(→‎Title: reply, even if it is a bit delayed)
 
Line 4: Line 4:


Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)
:I don't think ''(astrophysics)'' serves any useful purpose here. --[[User:Michael Geldorp|Michael Geldorp]] 11:15, 31 May 2008 (CDT)




[[Category:Rename suggested]]
[[Category:Rename suggested]]

Latest revision as of 10:15, 31 May 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The categorization of stars by various properties. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Astronomy [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Title

Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? J. Noel Chiappa 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)

I don't think (astrophysics) serves any useful purpose here. --Michael Geldorp 11:15, 31 May 2008 (CDT)