Talk:Stellar classification (astrophysics): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa m (+cat) |
imported>Michael Geldorp (→Title: reply, even if it is a bit delayed) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST) | Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST) | ||
:I don't think ''(astrophysics)'' serves any useful purpose here. --[[User:Michael Geldorp|Michael Geldorp]] 11:15, 31 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
[[Category:Rename suggested]] | [[Category:Rename suggested]] |
Latest revision as of 10:15, 31 May 2008
Title
Do we really need the "(astrophysics)" in the title? What other stellar classification system would there be? Magnitude, in astronomy? Is there something in astrology (about which I know nothing)? J. Noel Chiappa 20:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)
- I don't think (astrophysics) serves any useful purpose here. --Michael Geldorp 11:15, 31 May 2008 (CDT)