Talk:United States cabinet: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
m (New page: {{subpages}})
 
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(→‎consistency: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
== consistency ==
For each cabinet-level agency, there presumably will be a page for the agency itself, and for the head of the agency.  We are not completely consistent if these are U.S. (agency) or United States (agency), and U.S. (officer title) or United States (officer title). Whichever is the standard, we probably should have redirects and, when appropriate, disambiguation pages for the other common usages.
Especially the titles, and possibly the governments, also can be ambiguous at Federal and state level, such as [[secretary of state]].
Note that we should have articles for at least the incumbent agency heads, as they are confirmed, and for significant ones of the past, which presumably are subtopics of "title" articles. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 04:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:49, 30 January 2009

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The most senior committee of the executive branch of the United States government. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Politics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

consistency

For each cabinet-level agency, there presumably will be a page for the agency itself, and for the head of the agency. We are not completely consistent if these are U.S. (agency) or United States (agency), and U.S. (officer title) or United States (officer title). Whichever is the standard, we probably should have redirects and, when appropriate, disambiguation pages for the other common usages.

Especially the titles, and possibly the governments, also can be ambiguous at Federal and state level, such as secretary of state.

Note that we should have articles for at least the incumbent agency heads, as they are confirmed, and for significant ones of the past, which presumably are subtopics of "title" articles. Howard C. Berkowitz 04:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)