Talk:Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (This type of article does not seem to fit the goals of citizendium) |
imported>J. Noel Chiappa (→Advert: Inclusionism vs. common culture, and the Wikipediazation of CZ) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Advert== | ==Advert== | ||
Is there any encyclopedic reason why we would be writing about games that have not actually been released? This type of article does not seem to fit the goals of citizendium. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 15:04, 31 March 2008 (CDT) | Is there any encyclopedic reason why we would be writing about games that have not actually been released? This type of article does not seem to fit the goals of citizendium. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 15:04, 31 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
: I can't agree! I am an almost-radical inclusionist. Articles about pop culture are fair game here. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 15:16, 31 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
:: Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti game articles, just wondering if this is more promotional than encyclopedic? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 15:33, 31 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
: What about our 'maintainability' standard, in the long run? Will anyone care about this article in, say, 20 years? I am in general inclusionist, but only of stuff that's going to have some lasting interest/utility. I also worry that too much popular culture, and not enough serious content, will put us in the same intellectual ghetto (common-perception-wise) as Wikipedia. [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 21:14, 31 March 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 21:14, 31 March 2008
|
Metadata here |
Advert
Is there any encyclopedic reason why we would be writing about games that have not actually been released? This type of article does not seem to fit the goals of citizendium. Chris Day 15:04, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
- I can't agree! I am an almost-radical inclusionist. Articles about pop culture are fair game here. --Larry Sanger 15:16, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
- Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti game articles, just wondering if this is more promotional than encyclopedic? Chris Day 15:33, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
- What about our 'maintainability' standard, in the long run? Will anyone care about this article in, say, 20 years? I am in general inclusionist, but only of stuff that's going to have some lasting interest/utility. I also worry that too much popular culture, and not enough serious content, will put us in the same intellectual ghetto (common-perception-wise) as Wikipedia. J. Noel Chiappa 21:14, 31 March 2008 (CDT)
Categories:
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Games Developing Articles
- Games Nonstub Articles
- Games Internal Articles
- Computers Developing Articles
- Computers Nonstub Articles
- Computers Internal Articles
- Games Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Computers Underlinked Articles
- Need def
- Games need def
- Computers need def
- Need bib
- Games need bib
- Computers need bib
- Need ext
- Games need ext
- Computers need ext
- Video Games tag