CZ:Proposals/Editorial Council: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: == Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages == {{proposal |Brief descriptive title = Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages |Summary of proposal = By popular demand, we w...) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Notes = This is pretty much the only version of this class of proposal that I can see myself supporting, at present. | |Notes = This is pretty much the only version of this class of proposal that I can see myself supporting, at present. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Proposal navigation}} | |||
Revision as of 16:04, 13 February 2008
Pilot to allow Citizens to take credit for pages
Summary: By popular demand, we would, to a limited extent, allow Citizens to take authorship credit of articles. This would (for now) take the form of a template placed at the bottom of the page, which would, in small and unobtrusive print, list the contributors to an article in alphabetical order. Contributors would add themselves. Names would appear only if there were three names in the list. To avoid issues about what counts as an "important" edit, a person could take co-authorship credit for the very smallest of edits (e.g., removing commas). We would try this out in just one or two workgroups (the template would be removed from articles in any other workgroup).
| ||||||
| Complete proposal | ||||||