Talk:Myanmar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ro Thorpe No edit summary |
imported>David Finn (question) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Neutrality is not an option. There is a redirct from the SLORC's name - and I've corrected ''their'' name... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 13:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | Neutrality is not an option. There is a redirct from the SLORC's name - and I've corrected ''their'' name... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 13:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I don't get it - is Citizendium taking a political stance on the naming of this article? The United Nations [http://www.un.org/en/members/index.shtml members index] lists the country as Myanmar. If that is what the UN call it, what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach - there is nothing in the article itself that elaborates on this point. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 14:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:08, 11 October 2010
I think we should follow Wikipedia's lead, and use this name (I participated in the discussion there). I saw the junta's name in an article (sorry, forget which) during the Big Write & thought it was time to raise this point. Ro Thorpe 19:19, 5 March 2008 (CST)
- Why is it being called Burma in the article? David Finn 10:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Neutrality is not an option. There is a redirct from the SLORC's name - and I've corrected their name... Ro Thorpe 13:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't get it - is Citizendium taking a political stance on the naming of this article? The United Nations members index lists the country as Myanmar. If that is what the UN call it, what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach - there is nothing in the article itself that elaborates on this point. David Finn 14:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)