imported>RICARDO Gomes de Paiva DE FARIA |
imported>RICARDO Gomes de Paiva DE FARIA |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==General term for national intelligence==
| |
| Intelligence (espionage) doesn't work well, as espionage is a form of HUMINT. Here is a hierarchy that I developed at Wikipedia:
| |
|
| |
| <big><big>'''Intelligence cycle management'''</big></big>
| |
| :<big>'''Intelligence collection management'''</big>
| |
| :::SIGINT
| |
| ::::Electro-optical MASINT
| |
| ::::Nuclear MASINT
| |
| ::::Geophysical MASINT
| |
| ::::Radar MASINT ''should true imaging radar move to IMINT?''
| |
| ::::Radiofrequency MASINT
| |
| ::::Materials MASINT
| |
| :::HUMINT
| |
| ::::Clandestine HUMINT strong tie-in with counterintelligence
| |
| ::::Special reconnaissance also a special operations technique
| |
| :::::Special reconnaissance organizations
| |
| ::::Clandestine HUMINT operational techniques
| |
| :::::Clandestine HUMINT asset recruiting
| |
| ::::Clandestine HUMINT and Covert Action (also see Direct action (military))
| |
| :::::Clandestine cell system
| |
| :::OSINT$
| |
| :::TECHINT$ (the article exists, but has expanded, not necessarily cleanly, into national-level '''scientific and technical intelligence (S&TI)''' and '''economic intelligence'''. With the latter two, as with TECHINT, the problem is that they have aspects of both collection and analysis. I think they are more analysis, but haven't decided a good way to describe their collection requirements
| |
| :::::''medical intelligence'' (if it doesn't go under intelligence organizations) As for TECHINT, there are collection and analysis aspects.
| |
| :::IMINT$
| |
| ::::''Should imaging radar move here, but not, for example, tracking radar used to determine missile performance? Anything from electro-optical MASINT? My basic rule: IMINT forms pictures, quasi-imaging MASINT gives graphs or property-by-pixel tables'''
| |
| :<big>'''Intelligence analysis management'''</big>
| |
| :::Intelligence analysis
| |
| ::::Cognitive traps for intelligence analysis
| |
| ::::US intelligence community A-Space
| |
| :::''financial intelligence''
| |
| :::''economic intelligence''
| |
| :::''medical intelligence''
| |
| :<big>'''Intelligence dissemination management'''</big>
| |
| :<big>'''Intelligence cycle security'''</big>
| |
| :::Counterintelligence
| |
| ::::Counterintelligence failures*
| |
| ::::Counter-intelligence and counterterror organizations
| |
| ===Discussion of hierarchy===
| |
| <s>Currently, the only subset of '''Intelligence cycle management''' is '''Intelligence collection management'''. Shouldn't these be combined into one heading? Or is there more to come?</s> Forget that last comment, I missread the hierarchy [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 11:10, 1 May 2008 (CDT)
| |
| :I'm no expert here but is ''Intelligence cycle security'' really a subset of ''Intelligence cycle management''? Or should they both be at the same level?
| |
|
| |
| ::Good question. I intended to put security at a lower level than the management, because the top-level managers of intelligence constantly have to balance protecting sources with providing material to people who can use it. The classic example, although it has lots of nuances, is not providing enough information, or in a timely manner, about Japanese diplomatic activity to the field commanders at places such as Pearl Harbor.
| |
|
| |
| ::Perhaps the things to think about balancing are security and dissemination. With the benefit of hindsight, there were pieces, especially in different FBI offices that didn't share information, that could have given at least partial warning of the 9/11 hijackings. Part of the problem was that no one was "connecting the dots" between field offices, and that while there were interagency counterterror organizations, there was information not shared between the FBI and CIA. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 11:56, 1 May 2008 (CDT)
| |
|
| |
| == History of Contemporary Intelligence: A line of a research proposal. == | | == History of Contemporary Intelligence: A line of a research proposal. == |
|
| |
|
History of Contemporary Intelligence: A line of a research proposal.
Human acts may ultimately be an act of information (INFO[1]), sabotage (DISINFO)[2]) [3], or an act of protection, of counter-intelligence (CONTRINFO)[4].
It may be a line of research to elaborate that there exists an order of factors [5] that alters the product:
One needs 1. to have the will, 2. to know, what having one 3. power (be enabled, empowered), may result in his 4. act - The contention is that one needs, first, to desire to know, then he must also be able - be empowered... to end up that he will do something.
Austro-Hungarian Empire
By late 19th Century, the Habsburg Dinasty Intelligence Service had a gigantic Intelligence Archive located in Vienna controlled by Count Kalnoky - his successors still reachable in today's Rumania [6]. Count Kalnoky was the Foreign Affairs Minister of Austro-Hungarian Empire [7] (Its operations were worldwide, and same were instrumental in South American politics (citation needed), see Count Welsersheimb dialogues with Brazilian Emperor Dom Pedro II [8].
Greece
In Greece: One surely must expand a research on Konstantinos Kanaris (a.k.a. Constantine Kanaris) who gained his fame during the Greek War of Independence (1821–1829)[9].
Germany
The speculation, raisen by German Emperor Wilhelm II [10] himself, that Wilhelm Canaris was a descendant of Konstantinos Kanaris was never proven [11] he may have been uncle to Wilhelm Canaris [12], the German admiral, head of the Abwehr, the German military intelligence service, from 1935 to 1944 and member of the German Resistance that ended up hanged [13] by Hitler [14].
RICARDO Gomes de Paiva DE FARIA 10:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)