Talk:Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer |
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Somewhat off subject but ...: reply: see your talk page) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I wrote Leibniz and some other Citizen changed that to Leibnitz, which I accepted. With the chance of starting a war I bring up the question: Leibniz or Leibnitz? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:08, 2 July 2008 (CDT) PS See [[Talk:Isaac Newton]] | I wrote Leibniz and some other Citizen changed that to Leibnitz, which I accepted. With the chance of starting a war I bring up the question: Leibniz or Leibnitz? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:08, 2 July 2008 (CDT) PS See [[Talk:Isaac Newton]] | ||
: I have never seen it written "Leibnitz" in any philosophy book I've read. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 09:12, 2 July 2008 (CDT) | : I have never seen it written "Leibnitz" in any philosophy book I've read. --[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 09:12, 2 July 2008 (CDT) | ||
::I've seen it only very rarely. I don't recall seeing it in serious philosophy books, which virtually always use "Leibniz." I had a graduate course about Leibniz, FWIW. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:34, 2 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
:::He is generally spelled without a t in both Latin and German sources. Funnily, in [http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k625780 his PhD thesis] (written in Latin), he is spelled Leibnüz. -- [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 14:53, 2 July 2008 (CDT) | |||
== Somewhat off subject but ... == | |||
If anybody here is knowledgeable about philosophy, I have an article I wrote on Wikipedia about the philosophy of Spinoza which I would like to import here, but I'm new to CZ. It's not Wikipedia's current version but one from December, and I wrote almost all of it. It's based on the work of a Spinoza scholar, but rewritten for simplicity, and had great pictures (including animations) in it.--[[User:Thomas Wright Sulcer|Thomas Wright Sulcer]] 12:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
: See your [[User talk:Thomas Wright Sulcer|talk page]]! --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 12:58, 15 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:58, 15 February 2010
Leibniz or Leibnitz?
I wrote Leibniz and some other Citizen changed that to Leibnitz, which I accepted. With the chance of starting a war I bring up the question: Leibniz or Leibnitz? --Paul Wormer 09:08, 2 July 2008 (CDT) PS See Talk:Isaac Newton
- I have never seen it written "Leibnitz" in any philosophy book I've read. --Tom Morris 09:12, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- I've seen it only very rarely. I don't recall seeing it in serious philosophy books, which virtually always use "Leibniz." I had a graduate course about Leibniz, FWIW. --Larry Sanger 14:34, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
- He is generally spelled without a t in both Latin and German sources. Funnily, in his PhD thesis (written in Latin), he is spelled Leibnüz. -- Daniel Mietchen 14:53, 2 July 2008 (CDT)
Somewhat off subject but ...
If anybody here is knowledgeable about philosophy, I have an article I wrote on Wikipedia about the philosophy of Spinoza which I would like to import here, but I'm new to CZ. It's not Wikipedia's current version but one from December, and I wrote almost all of it. It's based on the work of a Spinoza scholar, but rewritten for simplicity, and had great pictures (including animations) in it.--Thomas Wright Sulcer 12:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- See your talk page! --Peter Schmitt 12:58, 15 February 2010 (UTC)