John Stuart Mill: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 9: Line 9:
==Views==
==Views==
===Logic===
===Logic===
{|align="right" cellpadding="10" style="background-color:#FFFFCC; width:50%; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:20px; font-size: 92%;"
|''In matters of evidence, as in all other human things, we neither require, nor can attain, the absolute. We must hold even our strongest convictions with an opening left in our minds for the reception of facts which contradict them; and only when we have taken this precaution, have we earned the right to act upon our convictions with complete confidence when no such contradiction appears. Whatever has been found true in innumerable instances, and never found to be false after due examination in any, we are safe in acting on as universal provisionally, until an undoubted exception could scarcely have escaped notion.''
:: A System of Logic[http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-h/27942-h.html]  page 405.
|}
John Stuart Mill was a proponent of [[induction]] at a time when the generally accepted method of reasoning was [[deduction]], as practised by the classical philosophers. He presented and expanded upon the work on induction by [[Roger Bacon]], and his "five canons of induction"
<ref>[http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-h/27942-h.html John Stuart Mill: ''A System Of Logic, Ratiocinative And Inductive'', Project Gutenberg ebook pages 280-292]</ref><ref>[http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/sci/mill.php ''Mill's methods for identifying causes'',OpenCourseWare on critical thinking, logic, and creativity (a graphical illustration of Mill's 5 canons of induction]</ref> were accepted for teaching purposes by the major English universities




Line 15: Line 22:
{|align="right" cellpadding="10" style="background-color:#FFFFCC; width:50%; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:20px; font-size: 92%;"
{|align="right" cellpadding="10" style="background-color:#FFFFCC; width:50%; border: 1px solid #aaa; margin:20px; font-size: 92%;"
|''In matters of evidence, as in all other human things, we neither require, nor can attain, the absolute. We must hold even our strongest convictions with an opening left in our minds for the reception of facts which contradict them; and only when we have taken this precaution, have we earned the right to act upon our convictions with complete confidence when no such contradiction appears. Whatever has been found true in innumerable instances, and never found to be false after due examination in any, we are safe in acting on as universal provisionally, until an undoubted exception could scarcely have escaped notion.''
|''In matters of evidence, as in all other human things, we neither require, nor can attain, the absolute. We must hold even our strongest convictions with an opening left in our minds for the reception of facts which contradict them; and only when we have taken this precaution, have we earned the right to act upon our convictions with complete confidence when no such contradiction appears. Whatever has been found true in innumerable instances, and never found to be false after due examination in any, we are safe in acting on as universal provisionally, until an undoubted exception could scarcely have escaped notion.''
:: Logic.
:: A System of Logic[http://www.gutenberg.org/files/27942/27942-h/27942-h.html]  page 405.
|}
|}
ohn Stewart Mill's "methods of induction" are five basic rules for making inductive causal inferences. In A System of Logic, Mill expanded and modernized Francis Bacon's views of inductive science as expressed in his Novum Organon and other works, with the added benefit of numerous examples and detailed explanations.  
ohn Stewart Mill's "methods of induction" are five basic rules for making inductive causal inferences. In A System of Logic, Mill expanded and modernized Francis Bacon's views of inductive science as expressed in his Novum Organon and other works, with the added benefit of numerous examples and detailed explanations.  
-->
-->
<ref>[http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/sci/mill.php ''Mill's methods for identifying causes'',OpenCourseWare on critical thinking, logic, and creativity]</ref>


===Utilitarianism===
===Utilitarianism===

Revision as of 09:18, 1 July 2011

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
Timelines [?]
Addendum [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), was the leading British philosopher of the nineteenth century. An exponent and developer of the empiricism of John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume, and of the utilitarianism of Jeremy Bentham, he made major contributions to economics and political philosophy and is generally considered to be the founder of British Liberalism.

Biography

(based upon his autbiography[1])
John Stuart Mill was the eldest son of James Mill, a writer, philosopher and follower of Jeremy Bentham. He was intensively educated by his father, receiving childhood instruction in Greek, Latin, and political economy. From an early age he was an avid reader of history, and as a teenager he acquired a profound understanding of logic and became familiar with the teachings of Adam Smith and David Ricardo. At the age of 14 he began a year's stay with a friend of his father's in France, where he made the acquaintance of the economist Jean-Baptiste Say; and on his return he turned his attention to the works of John Locke and Jeremy Bentham and became a convinced utilitarian. At the age of 17 he started work as a minor civil servant: a job that was sufficiently undemanding that he could do it and simultaneusly pursue his own thoughts. For a time he took the achievement of political reform to be his sole objective, but at the age of twenty he suffered a bout of depression, triggered by doubts about the merit of that objective. In 1830, at the age of 25, he formed "the most valuable friendship of my life" - with Mrs Harriet Taylor. Twenty years later, on the death of her husband, they were married - a marriage which ended with her death in 1858. In the meantime his outstanding intellectual reputation had been established by the publication in 1844 of his System of Logic that ran to eight editions and was adopted as a university textbook. The succession of major works that followed (links to which are available on the works subpage) is recorded on the timelines subpage. In 1865 he started a three-year stint as a Member of Parliament, and he died in 1873 at the age of 66.

Views

Logic

In matters of evidence, as in all other human things, we neither require, nor can attain, the absolute. We must hold even our strongest convictions with an opening left in our minds for the reception of facts which contradict them; and only when we have taken this precaution, have we earned the right to act upon our convictions with complete confidence when no such contradiction appears. Whatever has been found true in innumerable instances, and never found to be false after due examination in any, we are safe in acting on as universal provisionally, until an undoubted exception could scarcely have escaped notion.
A System of Logic[1] page 405.

John Stuart Mill was a proponent of induction at a time when the generally accepted method of reasoning was deduction, as practised by the classical philosophers. He presented and expanded upon the work on induction by Roger Bacon, and his "five canons of induction" [2][3] were accepted for teaching purposes by the major English universities



Utilitarianism

Liberty

Representative government

Views of J S Mill's critics

References