Talk:Order (relation): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch
(New talk page)
 
imported>Boris Tsirelson
(nice; however, error found)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
A nice article.
However, the phrase "An order isomorphism, or simply isomorphism between ordered sets is a monotonic bijection" (in "Mappings of ordered sets" section) is wrong; the inverse map also have to be monotonic. [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 16:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:15, 9 October 2010

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  An irreflexive antisymmetric transitive binary relation on a set. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Mathematics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

A nice article.

However, the phrase "An order isomorphism, or simply isomorphism between ordered sets is a monotonic bijection" (in "Mappings of ordered sets" section) is wrong; the inverse map also have to be monotonic. Boris Tsirelson 16:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Order_(relation)&oldid=559570"