Talk:The Teaching Company: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Removal: template instead of category)
imported>Peter Schmitt
(→‎Comments: revision done)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
=== Comments ===
=== Comments ===
Leans towards sounding like an advertisement for this company; not clear how CZ would be disadvantaged by the inclusion of this article. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 13:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Leans towards sounding like an advertisement for this company; not clear how CZ would be disadvantaged by the inclusion of this article. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 13:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
: I agree that this is not suitable in the current form, but since publishing houses etc. deserve an entry I think that a one-paragraph entry should be kept. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:09, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
: Accordingly, I have replaced [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=The_Teaching_Company&oldid=100656228 this] by two sentences. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:34, 29 April 2012

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Definition [?]
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Please add a brief definition or description.
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Education and Media [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English
To do.


Metadata here


Created. --Thomas Wright Sulcer 21:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal

Removal suggested by John Stephenson 13:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Editorial Council: Case 2012-002

Opened: John Stephenson 13:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Closed:

Comments

Leans towards sounding like an advertisement for this company; not clear how CZ would be disadvantaged by the inclusion of this article. John Stephenson 13:20, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I agree that this is not suitable in the current form, but since publishing houses etc. deserve an entry I think that a one-paragraph entry should be kept. --Peter Schmitt 23:09, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Accordingly, I have replaced this by two sentences. --Peter Schmitt 23:33, 29 April 2012 (UTC)