CZ:Ref:DOI:10.1126/science.caredit.a1000036: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (link) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| url=http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2010_04_09/caredit.a1000036 | doi=10.1126/science.caredit.a1000036 }} | | url=http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2010_04_09/caredit.a1000036 | doi=10.1126/science.caredit.a1000036 }} | ||
:Provides an introductory overview of [[Open notebook science]], focused on its practitioners. Covers the possibility of being [[scoop]]ed and exposes the benefits of [[open research]] in most of its variants: [[open science]], [[open data]], [[open access]], [[open source]]. | :Provides an introductory overview of [[Open notebook science]], focused on its practitioners. Covers the possibility of being [[scoop]]ed and exposes the benefits of [[open research]] in most of its variants: [[open science]], [[open data]], [[open access]], [[open source]]. | ||
:A lively discussion of the article is [ | :A lively discussion of the article is [http://ff.im/iM89S here], which broadens the subject to a comparison of [[open research]] and [[open journalism]]. | ||
Revision as of 05:35, 10 April 2010
Chelsea Wald (2010). "Scientists Embrace Openness". Science Careers (2010-04-09). DOI:10.1126/science.caredit.a1000036. Research Blogging. [e]
- Provides an introductory overview of Open notebook science, focused on its practitioners. Covers the possibility of being scooped and exposes the benefits of open research in most of its variants: open science, open data, open access, open source.
- A lively discussion of the article is here, which broadens the subject to a comparison of open research and open journalism.