Open Knowledge Conference/Program/Local Government Data: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen (started) |
imported>Daniel Mietchen (→Notes and comments: pasted in from http://piratepad.net/ep/pad/view/kDyWnVVfrn/rev.3358) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
and wikilink as appropriate. | and wikilink as appropriate. | ||
--> | --> | ||
Talk 2: Chris Taggart | |||
Title: Open Local data, Openly Local and The Open Election Data Project | |||
* It's been a good year, opendata.gov.uk, etc | |||
* Electoral data is a mess. | |||
* Councils, NDPB (quangos) are opaque | |||
* History of OpenlyLocal | |||
* Manchester project call MCC work for you | |||
* Screen scrape 140 councils (of 434) | |||
* availaible as RDF, JSON, XML | |||
* Future | |||
* more data | |||
* Use case: Private Eye | |||
* order investigation by the district auditor was a buried PDF | |||
* Local authorities now have a duty to engage | |||
* About power = assymetry of information | |||
* Raises the barriers to involvement. | |||
* Private companies who are outsourced by public money are closed. | |||
* OpenElectionData project | |||
* *succeed, or fail forward* | |||
* there is no public database of local election results | |||
* publish RDFa from page. | |||
* beginning to compile a database of election results | |||
* if it fails, there is a good argument for legislation | |||
* guessing anywhere from 12-40 councils who will publish data. | |||
* What we need? | |||
* A Freedom of Data act - too many different bodies to individually organise | |||
* central gov't needs to change how IT is done. <-- change use of MS Office? | |||
* "enabler or blocker" [sounds a bit like G.W. Bush's with us or against us meme -Tom] | |||
* we just need an 'axis of evil' /dff | |||
* Access of Evil is more appropriate, since Access is evil. -Tom :) |
Revision as of 06:23, 24 April 2010
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Title
Local Government Data
Authors
Keywords
Abstract
Paste abstract in here.
Notes and comments
Talk 2: Chris Taggart Title: Open Local data, Openly Local and The Open Election Data Project
- It's been a good year, opendata.gov.uk, etc
- Electoral data is a mess.
- Councils, NDPB (quangos) are opaque
- History of OpenlyLocal
- Manchester project call MCC work for you
- Screen scrape 140 councils (of 434)
- availaible as RDF, JSON, XML
- Future
- more data
- Use case: Private Eye
- order investigation by the district auditor was a buried PDF
- Local authorities now have a duty to engage
- About power = assymetry of information
- Raises the barriers to involvement.
- Private companies who are outsourced by public money are closed.
- OpenElectionData project
- *succeed, or fail forward*
- there is no public database of local election results
- publish RDFa from page.
- beginning to compile a database of election results
- if it fails, there is a good argument for legislation
- guessing anywhere from 12-40 councils who will publish data.
- What we need?
- A Freedom of Data act - too many different bodies to individually organise
- central gov't needs to change how IT is done. <-- change use of MS Office?
- "enabler or blocker" [sounds a bit like G.W. Bush's with us or against us meme -Tom]
- we just need an 'axis of evil' /dff
- Access of Evil is more appropriate, since Access is evil. -Tom :)