Template:CharterVote2/1/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Comment)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(maybe)
Line 10: Line 10:
:::What's the point of the qualifier "Registered?"  Will we have participants who are not registered?  Try this: [[User:Russell D. Jones|Jones]] 20:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
:::What's the point of the qualifier "Registered?"  Will we have participants who are not registered?  Try this: [[User:Russell D. Jones|Jones]] 20:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
<blockquote>Collaborators in the Citizendium shall be called "Citizens."</blockquote>
<blockquote>Collaborators in the Citizendium shall be called "Citizens."</blockquote>
::::I have no problem with that and remain open. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:50, 16 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

  • Registered participants shall be called "Citizens."
  • I agree with this ("Joe's revision from above section") D. Matt Innis 16:47, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
That was totally off the top of my head, so I'm not wedded to it if there is a better way to word it. I was thinking maybe: 'Registered contributors shall be called "Citizens".'
  • I would agree to either formulation, but I'm also open to other suggestions. -Joe Quick 17:07, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Maybe even: "Registered users shall be called "Citizens" -Joe Quick 17:24, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
What's the point of the qualifier "Registered?" Will we have participants who are not registered? Try this: Jones 20:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Collaborators in the Citizendium shall be called "Citizens."

I have no problem with that and remain open. D. Matt Innis 20:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)