Template:CharterVote2/21/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(Some sort of weird edit conflict deleted Matt's remark.)
imported>Russell D. Jones
(another scenario)
Line 31: Line 31:
::::::Then we don't have to worry about it. But, what if there is only one nominee. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
::::::Then we don't have to worry about it. But, what if there is only one nominee. [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 23:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
::::::We're a republic; you can't force people to run for office. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
::::::We're a republic; you can't force people to run for office. Which brings up a related issue: what if there are NO nominees?  [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:37, 16 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

  • The Managing Editor shall be elected by simple majority. For this election, up to four candidates shall be selected by the Management Council, taken from a list of Editors nominated by the community.

add the date of election with the MC?

  • The Managing Editor shall be elected by simple majority during the same election period as the Management Council. For this election, up to four candidates shall be selected by the Management Council, taken from a list of Editors nominated by the community.

D. Matt Innis 19:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Let me be sure I understand. It sounds as if there are three steps:
  1. EC names Editors.
  2. Community nominates persons from the EC list and picks 1-4 in [some way]
  3. MC picks ME from list of 4.

Howard C. Berkowitz 22:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

It looks like:
  • Community nominates several editors
  • MC chooses as many as four of those
  • Community votes for one.
D. Matt Innis 23:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
  • But the editor list clearly comes from the EC.
  • I have no objection to the MC picking the slate, and actually prefer their doing so. I would, however, recommend they be required to pick >1.
  • This needs to be unambiguous. Howard C. Berkowitz 23:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
What if there is only one nominee? D. Matt Innis 23:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Then there's something wrong with the process. There will always be enough philosophical differences of opinion that I don't think there ever will be a ME candidate that will be suitable to everyone, although one CZ-saint does come very close. Howard C. Berkowitz 23:20, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Then we don't have to worry about it. But, what if there is only one nominee. D. Matt Innis 23:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
We're a republic; you can't force people to run for office. Which brings up a related issue: what if there are NO nominees? Russell D. Jones 23:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)