User talk:ElectionJune2014/Referenda/5: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


:I agree completely. A number of changes recently have been weakening Editor authority, which is basically our USP (I don't think real names sufficient for that.) [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 09:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:I agree completely. A number of changes recently have been weakening Editor authority, which is basically our USP (I don't think real names sufficient for that.) [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 09:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
:I suppose as a compromise the ME might be given a veto over content decisions, Editor qualifications &c. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:53, 9 June 2014

Not thought through

I'd like to see the discussion of this proposal because this proposal cuts to the core of what makes CZ different. If this proposal has been hashed out among the citizenry, I'd like to read it so that I understand the rationale behind it. But I can't support this on the face of it -- it overturns a fundamental premise of CZ. Russell D. Jones 00:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

I agree completely. A number of changes recently have been weakening Editor authority, which is basically our USP (I don't think real names sufficient for that.) Peter Jackson 09:49, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I suppose as a compromise the ME might be given a veto over content decisions, Editor qualifications &c. Peter Jackson 09:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)