Talk:People's Republic of China/Catalogs/Political subdivisions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Pat Palmer moved page Talk:China/Catalogs/Political subdivisions to Talk:People's Republic of China/Catalogs/Political subdivisions without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
I think there needs to be an asterisk, or something, | I think there needs to be an asterisk, or something, next to Taiwan. The [[CZ:Neutrality Policy|Neutrality Policy]] would have us include it as part of the list, since that reflects the opinion of the PRC; it would have us exclude it, in keeping with the opinion of the Republic of China. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 08:43, 5 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Yes there does need to be an expanation. It's one of those ones that you can't win either way round on. I just haven't got round to doing all the provinces yet. Feel free to add it. [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 11:33, 5 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 29 February 2024
The {{subpages}} template is designed to be used within article clusters and their related pages.
However, it cannot function on sub-subpage talk pages..Please continue discussion at Talk:People's Republic of China, or return to the Political subdivisions subsubpage.
I think there needs to be an asterisk, or something, next to Taiwan. The Neutrality Policy would have us include it as part of the list, since that reflects the opinion of the PRC; it would have us exclude it, in keeping with the opinion of the Republic of China. --Larry Sanger 08:43, 5 May 2007 (CDT)
- Yes there does need to be an expanation. It's one of those ones that you can't win either way round on. I just haven't got round to doing all the provinces yet. Feel free to add it. Derek Harkness 11:33, 5 May 2007 (CDT)