Talk:Chiropractic/Draft: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter J. King
(→‎Omission: some references)
imported>D. Matt Innis
Line 34: Line 34:


:I did originally provide four or five references, but the software glitches ate them. For the U.K., the Royal Commission on Chiropraxy and Osteopathy is mentioned in a number of places, and there's [http://www.lewishampct.nhs.uk/document_view.php?PID=0000000001&DID=00000000000000000725 this]; for the U.S., there's [http://www.reedleycollege.edu/academic/Departments/ScienceTechnology/jdekker/Pre-ProfHealthclub.html this] and [http://www.reedleycollege.edu/alumni/alumni.html this] (mention of the Los Angeles School of Chiropraxy).  elsewhere there's [http://gena.ontology.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp:8081/mov/cgi-bin/movOntologyView.php?type=UMLS&target=C0344217&mode=search this].  To be honest, googling "chiropraxy" brings up a huge number of hits, including British NHS documents, U.S. documents, French, Japanese, socuments, etc. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black">&nbsp;[[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]]&nbsp;</span> 04:27, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
:I did originally provide four or five references, but the software glitches ate them. For the U.K., the Royal Commission on Chiropraxy and Osteopathy is mentioned in a number of places, and there's [http://www.lewishampct.nhs.uk/document_view.php?PID=0000000001&DID=00000000000000000725 this]; for the U.S., there's [http://www.reedleycollege.edu/academic/Departments/ScienceTechnology/jdekker/Pre-ProfHealthclub.html this] and [http://www.reedleycollege.edu/alumni/alumni.html this] (mention of the Los Angeles School of Chiropraxy).  elsewhere there's [http://gena.ontology.ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp:8081/mov/cgi-bin/movOntologyView.php?type=UMLS&target=C0344217&mode=search this].  To be honest, googling "chiropraxy" brings up a huge number of hits, including British NHS documents, U.S. documents, French, Japanese, socuments, etc. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black">&nbsp;[[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]]&nbsp;</span> 04:27, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
::The Los Angeles School of Chiropraxy only gets the one hit.  I wonder if it is a typo or mental error on the part of the person that typed that page? Keep lookiing for USA mentions. --[[User:D. Matt Innis|Matt Innis]] [[User talk:D. Matt Innis|(Talk)]] 10:16, 5 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:16, 5 April 2007




Approved version 1.1!

I have placed the approval template for version 1.1 of this article. Congratulations for your hard work everyone! Stephen Ewen 13:16, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Stephen, Thank you! I made two copyedits on dead links. Please verify that these are allowable-we have discussed extensively on the Forums that approving editors may have a brief window of opportunity to "proof". Nancy Sculerati 13:46, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Yes, thanks Stephen, and I am fine with the two changes so all is good:) Good job on this article and thank you very much for all your patience and hard work, especially Nancy and Gareth. --Matt Innis (Talk) 13:54, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Omission

I'm a little surprised that a common synonym – "chiropraxy" – isn't mentioned in the lead. --Peter J. King  Talk  05:15, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

Hi Peter, thanks. I suppose it would be a good idea to have a whole etymology section. We can work on that. I have never seen chiropraxy used in the USA. I do see it in the medical literature a lot. --Matt Innis (Talk) 07:58, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
I think that it's the more common form here in the U.K. (I don't remember ever seeing "Chiropractic" before this article...). --Peter J. King  Talk  08:56, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

That's one great thing about CZ, we can all fully realize that we're hopelessly provincial! :-) Nancy Sculerati 11:42, 3 April 2007 (CDT) Oh- but make sure it really is the same. I have to look up the actual terms, but I know that in Germany 2 different words are used, one for professional licensed chiropractors, one for massage practitioners who may be unlicensed and are not chiropractors, but use some of the techniques. Nancy Sculerati 11:44, 3 April 2007 (CDT)

Wow, all those certainly are strange thoughts. If we want to make this truly "international" I suppose we should entertain the idea of expounding on all of those. As more authors and editors arrive, we can add to it until we have enough to make a section. --Matt Innis (Talk) 12:10, 4 April 2007 (CDT)
I tried to post this yesterday, but kept hitting error messages, and losing my dat. I googled "chiropraxy", and it is simply a synonym for "chiropractic" (used pretty well exclusively in the U.K., and pretty widely in the U.S.). --Peter J. King  Talk  15:23, 4 April 2007

(CDT)

How 'bout a couple of actual references? I have looked up licensing in several US States and have not seen the term. Nancy Sculerati 20:47, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

I did originally provide four or five references, but the software glitches ate them. For the U.K., the Royal Commission on Chiropraxy and Osteopathy is mentioned in a number of places, and there's this; for the U.S., there's this and this (mention of the Los Angeles School of Chiropraxy). elsewhere there's this. To be honest, googling "chiropraxy" brings up a huge number of hits, including British NHS documents, U.S. documents, French, Japanese, socuments, etc. --Peter J. King  Talk  04:27, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
The Los Angeles School of Chiropraxy only gets the one hit. I wonder if it is a typo or mental error on the part of the person that typed that page? Keep lookiing for USA mentions. --Matt Innis (Talk) 10:16, 5 April 2007 (CDT)