Communications Security Establishment: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{subpages}}" to "{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}")
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{PropDel}}<br><br>{{subpages}}
[[Canada]]'s '''Communications Security Establishment''' has, like the U.S. [[National Security Agency]] (NSA), a dual mission of [[signals intelligence]] and [[communications security]].  Canada does not conduct a wide range of intelligence collection operations such [[clandestine human-source intelligence]] (HUMINT) or national-level [[imagery intelligence]] (IMINT), so SIGINT is its major collection discipline. Like NSA, CSE is also responsible for government-wide communications security. Canada, however, does have a world-class [[intelligence analysis]] capability in the [[Canadian Security Intelligence Service]].  
[[Canada]]'s '''Communications Security Establishment''' has, like the U.S. [[National Security Agency]] (NSA), a dual mission of [[signals intelligence]] and [[communications security]].  Canada does not conduct a wide range of intelligence collection operations such [[clandestine human-source intelligence]] (HUMINT) or national-level [[imagery intelligence]] (IMINT), so SIGINT is its major collection discipline. Like NSA, CSE is also responsible for government-wide communications security. Canada, however, does have a world-class [[intelligence analysis]] capability in the [[Canadian Security Intelligence Service]].


Under the still-classified "[[UKUSA agreement]]", Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. agreed to collect SIGINT in different parts of the world, and share the material, with overall analysis remaining a national responsibility. Even with analysis, there is significant cooperation among these countries.   
Under the still-classified "[[UKUSA agreement]]", Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. agreed to collect SIGINT in different parts of the world, and share the material, with overall analysis remaining a national responsibility. Even with analysis, there is significant cooperation among these countries.   

Revision as of 04:48, 8 April 2024

This article may be deleted soon.
To oppose or discuss a nomination, please go to CZ:Proposed for deletion and follow the instructions.

For the monthly nomination lists, see
Category:Articles for deletion.


This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Canada's Communications Security Establishment has, like the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), a dual mission of signals intelligence and communications security. Canada does not conduct a wide range of intelligence collection operations such clandestine human-source intelligence (HUMINT) or national-level imagery intelligence (IMINT), so SIGINT is its major collection discipline. Like NSA, CSE is also responsible for government-wide communications security. Canada, however, does have a world-class intelligence analysis capability in the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.

Under the still-classified "UKUSA agreement", Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the U.K., and the U.S. agreed to collect SIGINT in different parts of the world, and share the material, with overall analysis remaining a national responsibility. Even with analysis, there is significant cooperation among these countries.

CSE, headquartered in the Leonard Tilley Building in Ottawa. is responsible for Canada's SIGINT.various forms of signals intelligence, including traffic analysis and cryptanalysis. It has SIGINT collection stations scattered throughout Canada, in positions to receive signals from various parts of the world, positions dictated by the technical characteristics of radio signals to be intercepted.

The establishment acquired its first Cray supercomputer in the early 1980s. Staff were trained through an exchange program with the American National Security Agency.