User:Loc Vu-Quoc/Draft:Nguyen Ngoc Bich: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(War Began updated)
m (Text replacement - "Vo Nguyen Giap" to "Vo Nguyen Giap")
 
(120 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:


[[User:Loc_Vu-Quoc/Draft:Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich]]
[[User:Loc_Vu-Quoc/Draft:Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich]]
---------------
<!--
<span style="font-size:250%; color:blue">"HELLO"</span>
[[User:Loc Vu-Quoc|Loc Vu-Quoc]] 
-->


By [[User:Loc Vu-Quoc|Loc Vu-Quoc]] ([[User talk:Loc Vu-Quoc|talk]]) 17:30, 14 October 2024 (CDT) ◉  
By [[User:Loc Vu-Quoc|Loc Vu-Quoc]] ([https://archive.is/YUGPb Archive.is 2024.10.27]), [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich&action=history Edit history] ◉  
Started at [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich&oldid=893049 08:10, 10 June 2023]
Started at [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich&oldid=893049 08:10, 10 June 2023]
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! width="100%" | To remain silent is to be complicit
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> Peut-être la vérité permettra-t-elle de retrouver le chemin de la paix. Pour qui a pu réunir les pièces du dossier, il n'est plus pos­sible de se taire sans éprouver, chaque jour davantage, le senti­ment d'être complice.
[Perhaps the truth will allow us to find the path to peace. For those who have been able to gather the pieces of history, it is no longer possible to remain silent without feeling, with every passing day, the feeling of being complicit.] <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | ---Philippe Devillers (1952), ''Histoire du Viêt-Nam de 1940 à 1952,'' Seuil, Paris, Forewords.<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:8</sup>
|}
</blockquote>
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
[[File:Nguyen Ngoc Bich 1962.png|thumb|150px|left|Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Bich, 1962]]
[[File:Nguyen Ngoc Bich 1962.png|thumb|150px|left|Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Bich, 1962]]
Line 59: Line 78:
== First Indochina War ==
== First Indochina War ==
The broader historic events of [[Wikipedia:World War II|World War II]] and the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]]---specifically, the short interwar period between end of the former and the beginning of the later—led to the context in which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Nguyen Ngoc Bich]] fought the French colonists until he was captured.  
The broader historic events of [[Wikipedia:World War II|World War II]] and the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]]---specifically, the short interwar period between end of the former and the beginning of the later—led to the context in which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Nguyen Ngoc Bich]] fought the French colonists until he was captured.  
The activities directly or indirectly affected Bich's life by four historic individuals are summarized.
French General [[Wikipedia:de Gaulle|de Gaulle]], by his desire to reconquer Indochina as a French colony, was a main force that led to the First Indochina War, in which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fought.
Ho Chi Minh, founder and leader of the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]], called for the general uprising---against the French colonists and the Japanese occupiers---to which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] responded.  US President [[Wikipedia:FDR|Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] ardent anticolonialism could have prevented the two Indochina wars, and changed the course of history.  US President [[Wikipedia:Harry Truman|Harry Truman]] was a reason that the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]] is now called the "French-American" War in Vietnamese literature,<ref name="Lady.Borton.2020"/> and through his support for the French war effort supplied napalm bombs, which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] mentioned in his 1962 paper.  The US funded more than 30% of the war cost in 1952 under US President [[Wikipedia:Eisenhower|Eisenhouer]], and "nearly 80%" in 1954 under [[Wikipedia:Harry Truman|Truman]].<!--<sup>[[#French-war cost|Note]]</sup>--><sup>[[#French-war cost|N.fwc]]</sup><span id="French-war cost jump"></span>


<!--
[[Wikipedia:Ellen Hammer|Ellen J. Hammer]] was the first American-born historian<sup>[[#Virginia Thompson |N.vt]]</sup><span id="Virginia Thompson jump"></span> with a deep knowledge of the French colonial rule in Indochina in the early 1950s during the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]].  Dr. Hammer's<!--{{sfn|Pace|2001}}--><ref name=Pace.2001/> <sup>[[#Ellen Hammer |N.ejh]]</sup><span id="Ellen Hammer jump"></span>
The American dilemma (1-To help the French to re-establish its colony in Vietnam or 2-To help free the Vietnamese from the yoke of French colonialism) was described by Hammer as follows:
highly influential book titled ''The Struggle for Indochina''<!--{{sfn|Hammer|1954}}--><ref name="Hammer.1954"/> <sup>[[#Hammer (1954) |N.ehb]]</sup><span id="Hammer (1954) jump"></span>
-->
<!--{{em dash}}-->---published in 1954 well before the United States sent American troops to Vietnam in the 1960s<!--{{em dash}}-->---described the events, politics, and historic personalities leading to the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]].  Her works were considered among the must-read books by respected historians on Vietnam history, as Osborne (1967)<!--{{sfn|Osborne|1967}}--><ref name="Osborne.1967"/> wrote: "Indeed, any serious student of Viet-Nam will have either read Devillers,<sup>[[#Devillers ref |N.pd]]</sup><span id="Devillers ref jump"></span>
[[Wikipedia:Jean Lacouture|Lacouture]],<sup>[[#Jean Lacouture spoke |N.jls]]</sup><span id="Jean Lacouture spoke jump"></span> [[Wikipedia:Bernard B. Fall|Fall]], [[Wikipedia:Ellen Hammer|Hammer]] and Lancaster's<ref name=Lancaster.1961/>
<sup>[[#Lancaster book |N.dlb]]</sup><span id="Lancaster book jump"></span>
studies already, or will be better served by reading them first hand."  To give a historical context within which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fought the French colonists, there is no better English source to begin than Dr. Hammer's Vietnam-history book.
 
The American dilemma---(1) To help the French to re-establish its colony in Vietnam or (2) To help free the Vietnamese from the yoke of French colonialism---was described by Hammer as follows:
<blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
|-
! width="100%" |  
! width="100%" | American dilemma: Help the French or help the Vietnamese
|-
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> The United States has entangled itself in a war in a distant corner of Asia in which it resolutely does not want to participate and from which it equally resolutely cannot abstain. It has committed itself to the cause of France [ [[Wikipedia:French Indochina|French Indochina]] ] and of [[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]], but enough of the old spirit of anticolonialism is left to make this a somewhat unsavory commitment: it cannot bring itself wholly to ignore the fact that the free world looks less than free to a people whose country is being fought over by a foreign army. Aware that a lasting peace can be built only on satisfaction of the national aspirations of the Indochinese, the United States must at the same time conciliate a France reluctant to abandon her colonial past.  <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> The United States has entangled itself in a war in a distant corner of Asia in which it resolutely does not want to participate and from which it equally resolutely cannot abstain. It has committed itself to the cause of France [ [[Wikipedia:French Indochina|French Indochina]] ] and of [[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]], but enough of the old spirit of anticolonialism is left to make this a somewhat unsavory commitment: it cannot bring itself wholly to ignore the fact that the free world looks less than free to a people whose country is being fought over by a foreign army. Aware that a lasting peace can be built only on satisfaction of the national aspirations of the Indochinese, the United States must at the same time conciliate a France reluctant to abandon her colonial past.  <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
Line 76: Line 97:
|}
|}
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
The activities directly or indirectly affected Bich's life by four historic individuals are summarized.
French General [[Wikipedia:de Gaulle|de Gaulle]], by his desire to reconquer Indochina as a French colony, was a main force that led to the First Indochina War, in which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fought.
Ho Chi Minh, founder and leader of the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]], called for the general uprising---against the French colonists and the Japanese occupiers---to which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] responded.  US President [[Wikipedia:FDR|Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] ardent anticolonialism could have prevented the two Indochina wars, and changed the course of history.  US President [[Wikipedia:Harry Truman|Harry Truman]] was a reason that the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]] is now called the "French-American" War in Vietnamese literature,<ref name="Lady.Borton.2020"/> and through his support for the French war effort supplied napalm bombs, which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] mentioned in his 1962 paper.  The US funded more than 30% of the war cost in 1952 under US President [[Wikipedia:Eisenhower|Eisenhouer]], and "nearly 80%" in 1954 under [[Wikipedia:Harry Truman|Truman]].<!--<sup>[[#French-war cost|Note]]</sup>--><sup>[[#French-war cost|N.fwc]]</sup><span id="French-war cost jump"></span>


=== Charles de Gaulle ===
=== Charles de Gaulle ===
Line 144: Line 169:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


The Southeast Asia and Buddhism expert [[Wikipedia:Paul Mus|Paul Mus]], who first met [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] in 1945, recounted that [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] said<ref name="NYT Paul Mus obituary"/><!--{{sfn|NYT Paul Mus obituary}}--> then:<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp1]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump1"></span><!--{{efn |name=Paul Mus interview|In his interview in the 1968 documentary ''[[In the Year of the Pig]],'' at the {{plain link|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=13m56s|name=Youtube video time 13:56}}, Paul Mus recounted: "[[Ho Chi Minh]] said {{bracket|in 1945}}, 'I have no army.' That's not true now {{bracket|in 1968}}.  'I have no army.'  1945.  'I have no finance.  I have no diplomacy.  I have no public instruction.  I have just hatred and I will not disarm it until you give me confidence in you.'  Now this is the thing on which I would insist because it's still alive in his memory, as in mine. For every time [[Ho Chi Minh]] has trusted us, we betrayed him."}}-->
The Southeast Asia and Buddhism expert [[Wikipedia:Paul Mus|Paul Mus]], who first met [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] in 1945, recounted that [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] said<ref name="NYT Paul Mus obituary"/> then:<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp1]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump1"></span>
 
<!--
{{Quote frame |quote=<span style="font-size:110%">{{resize|120%|{{font color|blue|❝}}}} I have no army, no diplomacy, no finances, no industry, no public works. All I have is hatred, and I will not disarm it until I feel I can trust you [the French].{{resize|120%|{{font color|blue|❞}}}}</span> |author=<span style="font-size:103%">[[Ho Chi Minh]] |source=according to [[Paul Mus]], the ''New York Times'' 1969 obituary{{sfn|NYT Paul Mus obituary}}</span>}}
-->
<blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
Line 162: Line 183:
[[Wikipedia:Paul Mus|Paul Mus]] added "For every time [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] has trusted us, we betrayed him."<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp2]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump2"></span><!--{{efn|name=Paul Mus interview}}-->
[[Wikipedia:Paul Mus|Paul Mus]] added "For every time [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] has trusted us, we betrayed him."<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp2]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump2"></span><!--{{efn|name=Paul Mus interview}}-->


War broke out on 1945 Sep 23,<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:115</sup> with [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] joining the Viet Minh, an organization founded by Ho Chi Minh, to fight the French.
War broke out on [[#1945 Sep 23|1945 Sep 23]],<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:115</sup> with [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] joining the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]], an organization founded by Ho Chi Minh, to fight the French.


=== Ho Chi Minh ===
=== Ho Chi Minh ===
Line 169: Line 190:
[[File:Ho Chi Minh 1946 and signature.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Ho Chi Minh in 1946, with dedication to his god-daughter and signature]]
[[File:Ho Chi Minh 1946 and signature.jpg|150px|thumb|left|Ho Chi Minh in 1946, with dedication to his god-daughter and signature]]
-->
-->
[[File:Ho Chi Minh, Giap, farewell to OSS team 1945.png|200px|thumb|right|[[Ho Chi Minh]] and [[Vo Nguyen Giap]] giving a farewell party to the US Army intelligence Deer Team<!--{{efn|name=OSS-HCM}}--> ([[Wikipedia:Office of Strategic Services|OSS]]),<sup>[[#HCM and OSS |N.hos]]</sup><span id="HCM and OSS jump"></span> 1945.]]
[[File:Ho Chi Minh, Giap, farewell to OSS team 1945.png|200px|thumb|right|[[Ho Chi Minh]] and Vo Nguyen Giap giving a farewell party to the US Army intelligence Deer Team<!--{{efn|name=OSS-HCM}}--> ([[Wikipedia:Office of Strategic Services|OSS]]),<sup>[[#HCM and OSS |N.hos]]</sup><span id="HCM and OSS jump"></span> 1945.]]
For thirty years, from 1912 when [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] first visited Boston and New York City until about 1948-1949, Ho held out his hope that the US would provide military support for his anticolonialist resistance against the French.<ref name="Logevall.2012"/><sup>:xxii</sup><!--{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=xxii}}-->  
For thirty years, from 1912 when [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] first visited Boston and New York City until about 1948-1949, Ho held out his hope that the US would provide military support for his anticolonialist resistance against the French.<ref name="Logevall.2012"/><sup>:xxii</sup><!--{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=xxii}}-->  
Since that visit to the US in his early twenties, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]---like Bich, a Francophile anticolonialist,<sup>[[#Francophile anticolonialists|N.fa2]]</sup><span id="Francophile anticolonialists jump2"></span> <sup>[[#Primary sources, quotations|N.psq3]]</sup><span id="Primary sources, quotations jump3"></span><!--{{efn|name=quotations-VQL}}--> who was both a communist and a nationalist<sup>[[#Ho communist nationalist|N.hcn]]</sup><span id="Ho communist nationalist jump"></span> <!--{{efn|"For many decades there would be a heated debate among diplomats, politicians and political scientists in every corner of the world as to whether [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a communist or a nationalist. The answer is that he was both."{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=120}} }}--> ---developed a "lifelong admiration for Americans".<ref name=Langguth.2000/><sup>:55</sup><!--{{sfn|Langguth|2000|p=55}}--> <sup>[[#Ho admires Americans|N.haa]]</sup><span id="Ho admires Americans jump"></span><!--{{efn|As cited in Logevall (2012),{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=721}} Note 22, p. 721.}}-->
Since that visit to the US in his early twenties, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]---like Bich, a Francophile anticolonialist,<sup>[[#Francophile anticolonialists|N.fa2]]</sup><span id="Francophile anticolonialists jump2"></span> <sup>[[#Primary sources, quotations|N.psq3]]</sup><span id="Primary sources, quotations jump3"></span><!--{{efn|name=quotations-VQL}}--> who was both a communist and a nationalist<sup>[[#Ho communist nationalist|N.hcn]]</sup><span id="Ho communist nationalist jump"></span> <!--{{efn|"For many decades there would be a heated debate among diplomats, politicians and political scientists in every corner of the world as to whether [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a communist or a nationalist. The answer is that he was both."{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=120}} }}--> ---developed a "lifelong admiration for Americans".<ref name=Langguth.2000/><sup>:55</sup><!--{{sfn|Langguth|2000|p=55}}--> <sup>[[#Ho admires Americans|N.haa]]</sup><span id="Ho admires Americans jump"></span><!--{{efn|As cited in Logevall (2012),{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=721}} Note 22, p. 721.}}-->
Line 195: Line 216:
[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] returned to Vietnam in 1944 September, after obtaining the authorization from the Chinese authority, Gen. Chang Fa-Kwei (<!--[https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Fakui Zhang Fakui (German)]-->[[Wikipedia:de:Zhang Fakui|Zhang Fakui (German)]], <!--[https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr%C6%B0%C6%A1ng_Ph%C3%A1t_Khu%C3%AA Trương Phát Khuê] (Vietnamese)-->[[Wikipedia:vi:Trương Phát Khuê|Trương Phát Khuê (Vietnamese)]]) <!--{{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}} ([[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Zhang Fakui]], {{lang-vi|[[:vi:Trương_Phát_Khuê|Trương Phát Khuê]]}}){{emdash}}-->---who was under "severe pressure from the Japanese ''Ichigo'' offensive" to obtain intelligence in Indochina---and after submitting the "Outline of the Plan for the Activities of Entering Vietnam".<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:134</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=134}}-->  
[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] returned to Vietnam in 1944 September, after obtaining the authorization from the Chinese authority, Gen. Chang Fa-Kwei (<!--[https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_Fakui Zhang Fakui (German)]-->[[Wikipedia:de:Zhang Fakui|Zhang Fakui (German)]], <!--[https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tr%C6%B0%C6%A1ng_Ph%C3%A1t_Khu%C3%AA Trương Phát Khuê] (Vietnamese)-->[[Wikipedia:vi:Trương Phát Khuê|Trương Phát Khuê (Vietnamese)]]) <!--{{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}} ([[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Zhang Fakui]], {{lang-vi|[[:vi:Trương_Phát_Khuê|Trương Phát Khuê]]}}){{emdash}}-->---who was under "severe pressure from the Japanese ''Ichigo'' offensive" to obtain intelligence in Indochina---and after submitting the "Outline of the Plan for the Activities of Entering Vietnam".<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:134</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=134}}-->  
<sup>[[#Ho in Vietnam 1944 |N.hvn]]</sup><span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944 jump"></span>
<sup>[[#Ho in Vietnam 1944 |N.hvn]]</sup><span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944 jump"></span>
<!--{{efn|A French report at that time stated: "more than 200 political refugees had passed from China to Tonkin, most of them armed with pistols and daggers (''poiguards''), and that among them was a certain 'Nguyen Hai Quoc', who had crossed the border under the name of 'Ho Chi Minh'. Nguyen Hai Quoc, a man 'around sixty years old', was 'the probable leader' of the Viet Minh: 'Under Nguyen Hai Quoc's leadership, the new elements coming from Kwangsi have undertaken to reawaken the movement and bring back to their former activities the implacables who had taken refuge in the mountains'" {{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|pp=118, 208}}  
<!--{{efn|A French report at that time stated: "more than 200 political refugees had passed from China to Tonkin, most of them armed with pistols and daggers (''poiguards''), and that among them was a certain 'Nguyen Hai Quoc', who had crossed the border under the name of 'Ho Chi Minh'. Nguyen Hai Quoc, a man 'around sixty years old', was 'the probable leader' of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]]: 'Under Nguyen Hai Quoc's leadership, the new elements coming from Kwangsi have undertaken to reawaken the movement and bring back to their former activities the implacables who had taken refuge in the mountains'" {{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|pp=118, 208}}  
}}-->  
}}-->  
All three protagonists---the French [[Wikipedia:Vichy_France|Vichy]] colonialists, the Japanese occupiers, and the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]]---were deceived by US war plan,<sup>[[#US war plan |N.uwp]]</sup><span id="US war plan jump"></span>
All three protagonists---the French [[Wikipedia:Vichy_France|Vichy]] colonialists, the Japanese occupiers, and the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]]---were deceived by US war plan,<sup>[[#US war plan |N.uwp]]</sup><span id="US war plan jump"></span>
Line 219: Line 240:
}}-->
}}-->
(and to "make friends with"<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:210</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}-->) American [[Wikipedia:Office of Strategic Services|OSS]] and [[Wikipedia:Office of War Information|OWI]] (Office of War Information) officers to exchange intelligence.<sup>[[#Ho met OSS |N.hmo]]</sup><span id="Ho met OSS jump"></span>
(and to "make friends with"<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:210</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}-->) American [[Wikipedia:Office of Strategic Services|OSS]] and [[Wikipedia:Office of War Information|OWI]] (Office of War Information) officers to exchange intelligence.<sup>[[#Ho met OSS |N.hmo]]</sup><span id="Ho met OSS jump"></span>
<!--{{efn|[[Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s "mission was probably to obtain information on the development of the war, try to gain Allied recognition for his league and perhaps also secure the [[Viet Minh]] a role in a forthcoming invasion".  At the same time, [[:vi:Hoàng_Quốc_Việt|Hoang Quoc Viet]] carried out a similar mission in Kwangsi (now [[Guangxi]]) with the Chinese {{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}}, who told him that "I hope we shall soon meet again in Hanoi".{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}  See also the [https://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_F8F9FACD595E4A74BCA28655493A1743 PBS interview with Hoang Quoc Viet in 1981].
<!--{{efn|[[Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s "mission was probably to obtain information on the development of the war, try to gain Allied recognition for his league and perhaps also secure the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] a role in a forthcoming invasion".  At the same time, [[:vi:Hoàng_Quốc_Việt|Hoang Quoc Viet]] carried out a similar mission in Kwangsi (now [[Guangxi]]) with the Chinese {{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}}, who told him that "I hope we shall soon meet again in Hanoi".{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}  See also the [https://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_F8F9FACD595E4A74BCA28655493A1743 PBS interview with Hoang Quoc Viet in 1981].
}}-->
}}-->
<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:238</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=238}}-->  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s report to the [[Wikipedia:Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] mentioned the Japanese ''coup de force'' on the evening of 1945 March 9.<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:238</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=238}}-->  
<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:238</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=238}}-->  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s report to the [[Wikipedia:Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] mentioned the Japanese ''coup de force'' on the evening of 1945 March 9.<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:238</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=238}}-->  


In [[Wikipedia:Kunming|Kunming]], [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] requested [[Wikipedia:Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] Lt. Charles Fenn<sup>[[#Fenn helped Ho |N.fhh]]</sup><span id="Fenn helped Ho jump"></span>
In [[Wikipedia:Kunming|Kunming]], [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] requested [[Wikipedia:Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] Lt. Charles Fenn<sup>[[#Fenn helped Ho |N.fhh]]</sup><span id="Fenn helped Ho jump"></span>
<!--{{efn|[[Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] Lt. Charles Fenn helped "make Ho Chi Minh the undisputed leader of the Viet Minh in 1945".{{sfn|Bartholomew-Feis|2006|p=96}}  
<!--{{efn|[[Office_of_Strategic_Services|OSS]] Lt. Charles Fenn helped "make Ho Chi Minh the undisputed leader of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] in 1945".{{sfn|Bartholomew-Feis|2006|p=96}}  
}}-->  
}}-->  
to arrange for a meeting with Gen. [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Claire Chennault]], commander of the Flying Tigers.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  In the meeting that occurred on 1945 Mar 29, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] requested a portrait of [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Chennault]], who signed across the bottom "Yours sincerely, Claire L. Chennault".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] displayed the portrait of [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Chennault]], along with those of [[Wikipedia:Lenin|Lenin]] and [[Wikipedia:Mao|Mao]], in his lodging at [[Wikipedia:vi:Chiến_khu_Tân_Trào|Tân Trào]] as "tangible evidence to convince skeptical Vietnamese nationalists that he had American support".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  As additional evidence, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] also possessed six brand-new US Colt .45 pistols in original wrappings that he requested and got from Charles Fenn.<ref name="Fenn.1973"/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/hochiminhbiograp0000fenn/page/78/mode/2up?view=theater&q=pistols 79]</sup><!--{{sfn|Fenn|1973|p=79}}--> <ref name="Bartholomew-Feis.2006"/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/osshochiminhunex0000bart/page/158/mode/2up?q=%22pistols%22&view=theater 158]</sup><!--{{sfn|Bartholomew-Feis|2006|p=158}}--> This "seemingly insignificant quantity" of arms,<sup>[[#Ho gave pistols |N.hgp]]</sup><span id="Ho gave pistols jump"></span>
to arrange for a meeting with Gen. [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Claire Chennault]], commander of the Flying Tigers.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  In the meeting that occurred on 1945 Mar 29, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] requested a portrait of [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Chennault]], who signed across the bottom "Yours sincerely, Claire L. Chennault".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] displayed the portrait of [[Wikipedia:Claire Chennault|Chennault]], along with those of [[Wikipedia:Lenin|Lenin]] and [[Wikipedia:Mao|Mao]], in his lodging at [[Wikipedia:vi:Chiến_khu_Tân_Trào|Tân Trào]] as "tangible evidence to convince skeptical Vietnamese nationalists that he had American support".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->  As additional evidence, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] also possessed six brand-new US Colt .45 pistols in original wrappings that he requested and got from Charles Fenn.<ref name="Fenn.1973"/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/hochiminhbiograp0000fenn/page/78/mode/2up?view=theater&q=pistols 79]</sup><!--{{sfn|Fenn|1973|p=79}}--> <ref name="Bartholomew-Feis.2006"/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/osshochiminhunex0000bart/page/158/mode/2up?q=%22pistols%22&view=theater 158]</sup><!--{{sfn|Bartholomew-Feis|2006|p=158}}--> This "seemingly insignificant quantity" of arms,<sup>[[#Ho gave pistols |N.hgp]]</sup><span id="Ho gave pistols jump"></span>
Line 231: Line 252:
together with "Chennault's autographed photograph" as evidence, convinced other factions of the primacy of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]].  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s American-backing ruse worked.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->
together with "Chennault's autographed photograph" as evidence, convinced other factions of the primacy of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]].  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s American-backing ruse worked.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:58</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=58}}-->


[[File:Ho Chi Minh, Bao Dai, Siphanouvong 1945.png|200px|thumb|left|[[Wikipedia:Souphanouvong|Souphanouvong]], [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]], [[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]], 1945 Sep 4]]
[[File:Ho Chi Minh, Bao Dai, Siphanouvong 1945.png|200px|thumb|left|[[Wikipedia:Souphanouvong|Souphanouvong]], [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]], Vinh Thuy ([[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]]), 1945 Sep 4]]
In [[Wikipedia:Cochin China|Cochin China]] (the south),<sup>[[#Taberd Cochin China |N.tcc]]</sup><span id="Taberd Cochin China jump"></span>  
In [[Wikipedia:Cochin China|Cochin China]] (the south),<sup>[[#Taberd Cochin China |N.tcc]]</sup><span id="Taberd Cochin China jump"></span>  
<!--{{efn|[[Jean-Louis Taberd]] was likely among the first to explain the meaning of "[[Cochin China]]" in his 1837 scientific article; see quotation in ''Notes on Vietnam History''.{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}  
<!--{{efn|[[Jean-Louis Taberd]] was likely among the first to explain the meaning of "[[Cochin China]]" in his 1837 scientific article; see quotation in ''Notes on Vietnam History''.{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}  
}}-->  
}}-->  
where Bich lived and worked, [https://indochine.uqam.ca/en/historical-dictionary/1464-trn-vn-giau-h-nam-hoang-trn-vn-19112010.html Tran Van Giau] ([[Wikipedia:vi:Trần_Văn_Giàu|Trần Văn Giàu]] in Vietnamese), a [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] leader and "[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]]'s trusted friend",<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/186/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22the+Allies+with+arms%2C+equipment+and+training%22 186]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=186}}--> on 1945 Aug 22 used [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s ruse of "American backing for the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]]", to convince other pro-Japanese nationalist groups (Phuc Quoc, Dai Viet, United National Front<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/524/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22United+National+Front%22 524]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=524}}-->) and religious sects ([[Wikipedia:Cao Dai|Cao Dai]], [[Wikipedia:Hoa Hao|Hoa Hao]]) that they would be outlawed by the invading Allies, and thus should accept the leadership of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]], which had strong support of "the Allies with arms, equipment and training".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/186/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22the+Allies+with+arms%2C+equipment+and+training%22 186]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=186}}-->
where Bich lived and worked, [https://indochine.uqam.ca/en/historical-dictionary/1464-trn-vn-giau-h-nam-hoang-trn-vn-19112010.html Tran Van Giau] ([[Wikipedia:vi:Trần_Văn_Giàu|Trần Văn Giàu]] in Vietnamese), a [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] leader and "[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]]'s trusted friend",<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/186/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22the+Allies+with+arms%2C+equipment+and+training%22 186]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=186}}--> on 1945 Aug 22 used [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s ruse of "American backing for the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]]", to convince other pro-Japanese nationalist groups (Phuc Quoc, Dai Viet, United National Front<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/524/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22United+National+Front%22 524]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=524}}-->) and religious sects ([[Wikipedia:Cao Dai|Cao Dai]], [[Wikipedia:Hoa Hao|Hoa Hao]]) that they would be outlawed by the invading Allies, and thus should accept the leadership of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]], which had strong support of "the Allies with arms, equipment and training".<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/186/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22the+Allies+with+arms%2C+equipment+and+training%22 186]</sup><!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=186}}-->
Fearing a US invasion with the French colonialists helping, the Japanese initiated operation Bright Moon (''Meigo sakusen''), leading to a ''coup de force'' on 1945 March 9 to neutralize the French forces and to remove the French colonial administration in Indochina<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:65</sup> (and thus the status of [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]]'s job in the French colonial government).


{{Image|Leclerc convoy entered Hanoi 1947 Mar 18, French and Viet-Minh flags.JPG|right|200px|Leclerc's convoy entered Hanoi on 1946 Mar 18, flying both French and Viet-Minh flags.}}
{{Image|Leclerc convoy entered Hanoi 1947 Mar 18, French and Viet-Minh flags.JPG|right|200px|Leclerc's convoy entered Hanoi on 1946 Mar 18, flying both French and Viet-Minh flags.}}
Fearing a US invasion with the French colonialists helping, the Japanese initiated operation Bright Moon (''Meigo sakusen''), leading to a ''coup de force'' on 1945 March 9 to neutralize the French forces and to remove the French colonial administration in Indochina<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:65</sup> (and thus the status of [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]]'s job in the French colonial government).
Two days later, on 1945 Mar 11, then Emperor Bao Dai abolished the "French-Annamite Treaty of Protectorate of 1884"<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:73</sup> that put Vietnam under French protectorate, and proclaimed Vietnam independence:<sup>[[#Notes on Vietnam history |N.vnh3]]</sup><span id="Notes on Vietnam history jump3"></span>
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! width="100%" | Bao Dai's proclamation of Vietnam independence, 1945 Mar 11
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> In view of the world situation, and that of Asia in particular, the Government of Viet-Nam publicly proclaims that from this day forward, the protectorate treaty with France is abolished and that the Country resumes its rights to independence.
 
<span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> Viet-Nam will strive using its own means to develop itself to deserve the condition of an independent State and will follow the directives of the Greater East Asia Manifesto, considering itself as a member of the Greater East Asia, to contribute its resources to the common prosperity. Therefore, the Government of Viet-Nam trusts in the loyalty of Japan and is determined to collaborate with this country to achieve the aforementioned goal.  <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | --- Bao Dai, Hue, the 27th day of the 1st month of the 20th year Bao Dai (1945 Mar 11).<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:125</sup>
|}
</blockquote>
 
[[File:1946 Ho Chi Minh Leclerc Sainteny 2.png|thumb|200px|left|[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]], [[Wikipedia:Philippe_Leclerc_de_Hauteclocque|Leclerc]], [[Wikipedia:Jean Sainteny|Sainteny]], 1946 Mar 18.]]
The resulting power vacuum<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:64</sup> following this ''coup de force'' changed the political situation, and provided a favorable setting for the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] takeover of the government.<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:73</sup>  In 1945 April, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] walked a perilous journey from [[Wikipedia:vi:Pác_Bó|Pác Bó]] to [[Wikipedia:vi:Chiến_khu_Tân_Trào|Tân Trào]], the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] headquarters in the Liberated Area. There, on 1945 August 16, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] called for a general uprising to throw out the Japanese occupiers that ultimately led to the [[Wikipedia:August Revolution|August Revolution]].<sup>[[#Power vacuum to August Revolution |N.pvar]]</sup><span id="Power vacuum to August Revolution jump"></span>  
The resulting power vacuum<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:64</sup> following this ''coup de force'' changed the political situation, and provided a favorable setting for the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] takeover of the government.<ref name="Tonnesson.2007"/><sup>:73</sup>  In 1945 April, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] walked a perilous journey from [[Wikipedia:vi:Pác_Bó|Pác Bó]] to [[Wikipedia:vi:Chiến_khu_Tân_Trào|Tân Trào]], the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] headquarters in the Liberated Area. There, on 1945 August 16, [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]] called for a general uprising to throw out the Japanese occupiers that ultimately led to the [[Wikipedia:August Revolution|August Revolution]].<sup>[[#Power vacuum to August Revolution |N.pvar]]</sup><span id="Power vacuum to August Revolution jump"></span>  


Line 257: Line 294:
instead of the [[Wikipedia:Cao Dai|Cao Dai]] force.
instead of the [[Wikipedia:Cao Dai|Cao Dai]] force.


[[File:1946 Ho Chi Minh Leclerc Sainteny 2.png|thumb|200px|left|[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]], [[Wikipedia:Philippe_Leclerc_de_Hauteclocque|Leclerc]], [[Wikipedia:Jean Sainteny|Sainteny]], 1946 Mar 18.]]
<!--{{Image|Ho Chi Minh and d'Argenlieu on Emile-Bertin 1945 Mar 24.JPG|right|350px|Add image caption here.}}-->
[[File:Ho Chi Minh and d'Argenlieu on Emile-Bertin 1945 Mar 24.JPG|thumb|right|250px|Ho Chi Minh and d'Argenlieu on the French battleship ''Emile-Bertin'', 1946 Mar 24.]]
Under the pressure of a "strong resolution calling for Bao Dai's abdication" by the "leftist students and faculty" in Hanoi around 1945 Aug 20<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:185-6</sup> and also by the Viet Minh,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:186</sup> Bao Dai "voluntarily"<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:12</sup> abdicated to become the "Supreme Advisor"<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:143</sup> <sup>[[#Bao Dai abdication|N.bda2]]</sup><span id="Bao Dai abdication jump2"></span> to the new government of Ho Chi Minh, who "did not thus declare but ''confirm'' Vietnam's independence in his famous address to the people in Ba Dinh square in Hanoi"<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:12</sup> on 1945 Sep 2.<sup>[[#HCM Vietnam Independence |N.hvi]]</sup><span id="HCM Vietnam Independence jump"></span> 
 
<!--<span style="background-color:yellow">24.5.27, TO BE WRITTEN, March 6 Accords, Ellen Hammer</span>. -->
<!--<span style="background-color:yellow">24.5.27, TO BE WRITTEN, March 6 Accords, Ellen Hammer</span>. -->
After the August Revolution in 1945, the French began to negotiate their return to Tonkin with both the Viet Minh and the Chinese army coming to disarm the defeated Japanese north of the 16th parallel.  Ho Chi Minh was weary of the Chinese, who might stay in Vietnam permanently, signed the March 6 [1946] Accords<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a1]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump1"></span> <sup>[[#March 6 Accords jump3|N.m6a3]]</sup> with Jean Sainteny to agree to let the French army under General Leclerc to enter Tonkin.  On 1946 Mar 18, "General Leclerc led 1,200 troops and 220 vehicles," bearing both French and Viet-Minh flags, "into Hanoi to the relief and delight of more than ten thousand French civil­ians who had gathered along Trang Tien Street to cheer and sing” the French national anthem.[Marr 2007 in Lawrence 2007, p.90]<ref name=Marr.2007/><sup>:90</sup>
After the August Revolution in 1945, the French began to negotiate their return to Tonkin with both the Viet Minh and the Chinese army coming to disarm the defeated Japanese north of the 16th parallel.  Ho Chi Minh was weary of the Chinese, who might stay in Vietnam permanently, signed the ''preliminary'' March 6 [1946] Accords<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a1]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump1"></span> <sup>[[#March 6 Accords jump3|N.m6a3]]</sup> with Jean Sainteny, "commissioner of the French Republic in Tonkin and North Annam [central Vietnam],"<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:9</sup> to agree to let the French army under General Leclerc to enter Tonkin.  On 1946 Mar 18, "General Leclerc led 1,200 troops and 220 vehicles,"<ref name=Marr.2007/><sup>:90</sup> bearing both French and Viet-Minh flags,<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:238</sup> <sup>[[#Leclerc entered Hanoi |N.leh]]</sup><span id="Leclerc entered Hanoi jump"></span> "into Hanoi to the relief and delight of more than ten thousand French civil­ians who had gathered along Trang Tien Street to cheer and sing” the French national anthem.<ref name=Marr.2007/><sup>:90</sup>
After his entry into Hanoi, "Leclerc quickly established cordial relations with Ho Chi Minh."<ref name="Gunn.2013"/>
After his entry into Hanoi, "Leclerc quickly established cordial relations with Ho Chi Minh."<ref name="Gunn.2013"/>
Then High Commissioner d'Argenlieu, the "abomination of Vietnam,"<sup>[[#d'Argenlieu recall |N.dar2]]</sup><span id="d'Argenlieu recall jump2"></span> insisted to meet Ho Chi Minh on the French battleship ''Emile-Bertin'', "bristling with guns" to impress on Ho French military power, in the Ha Long Bay on 1946 Mar 24, together with Gen. Leclerc and Jean Sainteny for a follow-up discussion stipulated by the preliminary March 6 Accords.<sup>[[#HCM Sainteny Catalina |N.hsc]]</sup><span id="HCM Sainteny Catalina jump"></span>  The key issue was to find a venue for a conference leading to a permanent agreement.  While d'Argenlieu wanted to have the conference in Dalat, Cochin China (south Vietnam), Ho together with Leclerc and Sainteny wanted to meet in Paris.
<!--{{Image|Ho Chi Minh observing battle 1950 Sep.JPG|right|350px|Add image caption here.}}-->
[[File:Ho Chi Minh observing battle 1950 Sep.JPG|thumb|left|250px|Ho Chi Minh observing a battlefield in 1950 Sep.]]
In May 1946, Ho Chi Minh boarded an airplane for France.<sup>[[#Ho in France 1946 |N.hif]]</sup><span id="Ho in France 1946 jump"></span>  The conference at Fontainebleau, outside of Paris, failed to reach an agreement.  With "nearly insoluble fundamental differences of viewpoint,"<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:84</sup> the main disagreements centered around the unification of the three regions, called the "three Ky," namely Tonkin (north), Annam (central), Cochin China (south Vietnam), and the independence of Vietnam, to which France only wanted to give an "autonomy."<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:84</sup>  On 1946 August 1, D'Argenlieu undercut the Fontaineblau negotiation by calling for a "federation" conference in Dalat, giving the autonomy status to Cochin China, thus preempted the possibility of Cochin China to join a unification of the "three Ky" via a referendum as agreed to in the March 6 Accords.<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:84</sup> Ho told Sainteny:
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! width="100%" | Ho Chi Minh to Jean Sainteny, 1946 September
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> Then if we must fight, we will fight. You will kill ten of my men while we will kill one of yours. But you will be the ones to end up exhausted.  And in the long run, I will win! <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | --- Sainteny 1972, ''Ho Chi Minh and His Vietnam''.<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:66, 89</sup>
|}
</blockquote>


CBS reporter [[Wikipedia:David Schoenbrun|David Schoenbrun]] interviewed [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] on 1946 Sep 11, the same day that a telegram was dispatched from the High Commissioner d'Argenlieu to the French Indochina Committee on the arrest of [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] on 1946 Aug 25.:<sup>[[#NNC.VQL.2023 |N.bb]]</sup><span id="NNC.VQL.2023 jump"></span>
CBS reporter [[Wikipedia:David Schoenbrun|David Schoenbrun]] interviewed [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] on 1946 Sep 11, the same day that a telegram was dispatched from the High Commissioner d'Argenlieu to the French Indochina Committee on the arrest of [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] on 1946 Aug 25.:<sup>[[#NNC.VQL.2023 |N.bb]]</sup><span id="NNC.VQL.2023 jump"></span>
Line 281: Line 337:
<span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> And he [Ho] said: Oh we have a lot of things that can match the French weapons.  Tanks are no good in swamps. And we have swamps in which the French tanks will sink.  And we have another secret weapon, it's nationalism. And don't think that a small ragged band cannot fight against a modern army.  It will be a war between an elephant and a tiger.  If the tiger ever stands still the elephant will crush him and pierce him with his mighty tusks. But the tiger of Indochina is not going to stand still.  We're going to hide in our jungles by day and steal out by night.  And the tiger will jump on the back of the elephant and tear huge chunks out of his flesh and then jump back into the jungle.  And after a while the mighty elephant will bleed to death. <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
<span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> And he [Ho] said: Oh we have a lot of things that can match the French weapons.  Tanks are no good in swamps. And we have swamps in which the French tanks will sink.  And we have another secret weapon, it's nationalism. And don't think that a small ragged band cannot fight against a modern army.  It will be a war between an elephant and a tiger.  If the tiger ever stands still the elephant will crush him and pierce him with his mighty tusks. But the tiger of Indochina is not going to stand still.  We're going to hide in our jungles by day and steal out by night.  And the tiger will jump on the back of the elephant and tear huge chunks out of his flesh and then jump back into the jungle.  And after a while the mighty elephant will bleed to death. <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | --- CBS reporter [[Wikipedia:David Schoenbrun|David Schoenbrun]], Youtube video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWY9KbIXpdI&t=190s French involvement in Vietnam & Dien Bien Phu - 1962, time 3:10].<ref name="Giniger.1984"/>
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | --- CBS reporter [[Wikipedia:David Schoenbrun|David Schoenbrun]], Youtube video [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWY9KbIXpdI&t=190s ''French involvement in Vietnam & Dien Bien Phu - 1962'', time 3:10].<ref name="Giniger.1984"/>
|}
|}
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Line 287: Line 343:
<!--<span style="background-color:yellow">24.5.27, Bich wrote about the French use of American-made [[napalm]] bombs in his 1962 paper.  TO BE WRITTEN</span>-->
<!--<span style="background-color:yellow">24.5.27, Bich wrote about the French use of American-made [[napalm]] bombs in his 1962 paper.  TO BE WRITTEN</span>-->
[[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] wrote about the French use of American-made napalm bombs; see Section [[#Napalm bombs|Napalm bombs]].
[[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] wrote about the French use of American-made napalm bombs; see Section [[#Napalm bombs|Napalm bombs]].
<span style="background-color:yellow">I AM HERE 24.11.30.</span>


=== Franklin D. Roosevelt ===
=== Franklin D. Roosevelt ===
Line 316: Line 374:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<!--"Even before the start of World War II, FDR had reached the conclusion that, for good or ill, complete independence was foreordained for all or almost all the European colonies." Logevall 2012 p.74-->
<!--"Even before the start of World War II, FDR had reached the conclusion that, for good or ill, complete independence was foreordained for all or almost all the European colonies." Logevall 2012 p.74-->
"Roosevelt went out of his way to single out France in Indochina and often cited French rule there as a flagrant example of onerous and exploitative colonialism."<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:51</sup>


[[Wikipedia:FDR|Roosevelt]]'s anti-colonialist speech was subsequently encoded in the third point of [[Wikipedia:The Atlantic Charter|The Atlantic Charter]],<sup>[[#Complete Atlantic Charter |N.cac]]</sup><span id="Complete Atlantic Charter jump"></span>
[[Wikipedia:FDR|Roosevelt]]'s anti-colonialist speech was subsequently encoded in the third point of [[Wikipedia:The Atlantic Charter|The Atlantic Charter]],<sup>[[#Complete Atlantic Charter |N.cac]]</sup><span id="Complete Atlantic Charter jump"></span>
Line 349: Line 409:
On 1945 Mar 23, FDR "wanted to know what Wedemeyer could do to arm local resistance groups opposed to French rule."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:67</sup>  Wedemeyer wrote in a cable in 1945 May: "When talking to the President on my last visit he ex­plained the United States policy for FIC [French Indochina] and told me that I must watch carefully to prevent British and French political activities in the area and that I should give only such support to the British and French as would be required in direct operations against  
On 1945 Mar 23, FDR "wanted to know what Wedemeyer could do to arm local resistance groups opposed to French rule."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:67</sup>  Wedemeyer wrote in a cable in 1945 May: "When talking to the President on my last visit he ex­plained the United States policy for FIC [French Indochina] and told me that I must watch carefully to prevent British and French political activities in the area and that I should give only such support to the British and French as would be required in direct operations against  
the Japanese."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:67</sup>
the Japanese."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:67</sup>
Wedemeyer "continued
to carry out Roosevelt’s directives on Indochina well after the President’s death,"<ref name=Tonnesson.1991/><sup>:18</sup> and squabbled with Lord Mountbatten, head of South-East Asia Command (SEAC), over "which commander held responsibility for military operations in Indochina."<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:88</sup>


The Supremo, Lord Mountbatten, head of South-East Asia Command (SEAC), asked Gen. Leclerc, who left Paris on 1945 Aug 17 on his way to reconquer Indochina under the order of de Gaulle, to first come to Kandy, Sri Lanka, SEAC headquarters.<ref name=Devillers.1952></ref><sup>:152</sup> When Leclerc arrived on 1945 Aug 22, Mountbatten told him, "If Roosevelt had lived, you would not go to Indochina."<ref name=Devillers.1952></ref><sup>:153</sup> <sup>[[#Mountbatten to Leclerc |N.mtl]]</sup><span id="Mountbatten to Leclerc jump"></span>
Mountbatten, the Supremo, asked Gen. Leclerc, who left Paris on 1945 Aug 17 on his way to reconquer Indochina under the order of de Gaulle, to first come to Kandy, Sri Lanka, SEAC headquarters.<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:152</sup> When Leclerc arrived on 1945 Aug 22, Mountbatten told him, "If Roosevelt had lived, you would not go to Indochina."<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:153</sup> <sup>[[#Mountbatten to Leclerc |N.mtl]]</sup><span id="Mountbatten to Leclerc jump"></span>


=== Harry S. Truman ===
=== Harry S. Truman ===
[[File:Harry S. Truman.jpg|150px|thumb|left|[[Harry S. Truman]], circa 1945]]
[[File:Harry S. Truman.jpg|150px|thumb|left|[[Harry S. Truman]], circa 1945]]
Truman reversed Roosevelt’s commitment to free Indochina of French colonialism, lent US support to the French, leading to The First Indochina War, with [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fighting the French.
Truman reversed Roosevelt’s commitment to free Indochina of French colonialism, allowing the French to reconquer Cochin-china with the help of the British, leading to The First Indochina War, with [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fighting the French.


Roosevelt had selected Truman as his Vice President because Truman was more moderate than the previous left-leaning VP Henry Wallace.<ref name=OBrien.2024/>  But Roosevelt kept Truman in the dark about foreign policies, met Truman only six times, and only one time alone without aides.  Truman did not have experience in international relations, and was kept so, particularly about the important Yalta Conference in 1945 February, where Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin discussed the new world order.<ref name=OBrien.2024/>   
Roosevelt had selected Truman as his Vice President because Truman was more moderate than the previous left-leaning VP Henry Wallace.<ref name=OBrien.2024/>  But Roosevelt kept Truman in the dark about foreign policies,<sup>[[#Truman foreign policy |N.tfp]]</sup><span id="Truman foreign policy jump"></span> met Truman only six times, and only one time alone without aides.  Truman did not have experience in international relations, and was kept so, particularly about the important Yalta Conference in 1945 February, where Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin discussed the new world order.<ref name=OBrien.2024/>   


[[File:Potsdam Stalin Truman Gromyko Byrnes Molotov 1945 Jul 18.png|thumb|200px|right|Potsdam Stalin Truman Gromyko Byrnes Molotov 1945 Jul 18]]
[[File:Potsdam Truman Churchill Stalin 1945 Jul 17.png|thumb|200px|right|Potsdam Truman Churchill Stalin 1945 Jul 17]]
After the secretive FDR (who "never wrote down, and rarely discussed, a concrete vision for the postwar world"<ref name=OBrien.2024/>) died, "U.S. policy fell into the hands of Truman, who had no idea what Roosevelt had really wanted to achieve or how he had planned to achieve it. Over the coming three years, Truman would take this ignorance, combined with Stalin’s strategic overreach and blundering, and create the Cold War that Roosevelt had always been keen to avoid."<ref name=OBrien.2024/>
After the secretive FDR (who "never wrote down, and rarely discussed, a concrete vision for the postwar world"<ref name=OBrien.2024/>) died, "U.S. policy fell into the hands of Truman, who had no idea what Roosevelt had really wanted to achieve or how he had planned to achieve it. Over the coming three years, Truman would take this ignorance, combined with Stalin’s strategic overreach and blundering, and create the Cold War that Roosevelt had always been keen to avoid."<ref name=OBrien.2024/>


To maintain the appearance of continuing Roosevelt’s policy regarding Indochina, as Truman "did not want to convey the impression that his [Indochina] pol­icy was at odds with Roosevelt’s,"<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup>  it took Truman close to two months, from the death of Roosevelt on 1945 Apr 12, until 1945 Jun 7 (the date of the telegram from Acting Secretary of State Joseph Grew, on behalf of Truman, to US Ambassador Patrick Hurley),<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:72</sup> <sup>[[#US Ambassador Hurley |N.uah]]</sup><span id="US Ambassador Hurley jump"></span> to provide American officials in the Far East (US Ambassador Patrick Hurley and Gen Wedemeyer, US commander of China Theater) with "less than clear" policy regarding Indochina, "portraying change as continuity" of Roosevelt's policy of not letting the French reconquer Indochina as a colony.<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:71</sup>
To maintain the appearance of continuing Roosevelt’s policy regarding Indochina, as Truman "did not want to convey the impression that his [Indochina] pol­icy was at odds with Roosevelt’s,"<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup>  it took Truman close to two months, from the death of Roosevelt on 1945 Apr 12, until 1945 Jun 7 (the date of the telegram from Acting Secretary of State Joseph Grew, on behalf of Truman, to US Ambassador Patrick Hurley),<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:72</sup> <sup>[[#US Ambassador Hurley |N.uah]]</sup><span id="US Ambassador Hurley jump"></span> to provide American officials in the Far East (US Ambassador Patrick Hurley and Gen Wedemeyer, US commander of China Theater) with "less than clear" policy regarding Indochina, "portraying change as continuity" of Roosevelt's policy of not letting the French reconquer Indochina as a colony.<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:71</sup>


[[File:Potsdam Truman Churchill Stalin 1945 Jul 17.png|thumb|200px|left|Potsdam Truman Churchill Stalin 1945 Jul 17]]
[[File:Potsdam Stalin Truman Gromyko Byrnes Molotov 1945 Jul 18.png|thumb|200px|left|Potsdam Stalin Truman Gromyko Byrnes Molotov 1945 Jul 18]]
Truman's ("less than clear") US policy is described by Grew as follows: "It is the President's intention at some appropriate time to ask that the French Government give some positive indication of its in­tentions in regard to the establishment of civil liberties and increasing measures of self-government in Indo-China before formulating further declarations of policy in this respect."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:71</sup>
Truman's ("less than clear") US policy is described by Grew as follows: "It is the President's intention at some appropriate time to ask that the French Government give some positive indication of its in­tentions in regard to the establishment of civil liberties and increasing measures of self-government in Indo-China before formulating further declarations of policy in this respect."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:71</sup>


Under the threat of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, Truman did not want to “have a conflict with France and Britain”<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup> over the insistence of these countries to reconquer their lost colonies, effectively abandoning Roosevelt’s trusteeship plan for Indochina.  Hurley and Wedemeyer "continued to operate in the shadow of FDR."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup>
Under the threat of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, Truman did not want to “have a conflict with France and Britain”<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup> over the insistence of these countries to reconquer their lost colonies, effectively abandoning Roosevelt’s trusteeship plan for Indochina.  Hurley and Wedemeyer "continued to operate in the shadow of FDR."<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:70</sup>


As a result, “lacking clear directives from Truman, US military and intelligence agencies remained uncertain of their government's Indochina policy. Some of them therefore continued to apply Roosevelt’s anti-French policy.<ref name=Tonnesson.1991/><sup>:19</sup>
[[File:Wedemeyer in China 1945 b.png|thumb|right|150px|US Gen. [[Wikipedia:Albert C. Wedemeyer|Albert C. Wedemeyer]], China, 1945]]
 
As a result, "lacking clear directives from Truman, US military and intelligence agencies remained uncertain of their government's Indochina policy. Some of them therefore continued to apply Roosevelt's anti-French policy."<ref name=Tonnesson.1991/><sup>:19</sup>
==== American middleway ====
<!--
Later, in 1945 July, at the Potsdam Conference, the US
Under US President [[Wikipedia:Franklin D. Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]], the US policy was to remove the French colonists from Indochina,<ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:57</sup> <sup>[[#NNC-VQL-more-details |N.bq1]]</sup><span id="NNC-VQL-more-details jump1"></span> as the
 
-->
 
French official [[Wikipedia:Jean Sainteny|Jean Sainteny]] lamented that he was "face to face with a deliberate Allied maneuver to evict the French from Indochina and that at the present time the Allied attitude is more harmful than that of the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]]."<!--{{sfn|Fall|1966|p=68–69}}--><ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:68-69</sup> <sup>[[#NNC-VQL-more-details |N.bq2]]</sup><span id="NNC-VQL-more-details jump2"></span>
<span style="background-color:yellow">I AM HERE 24.11.8.</span>
<!--{{efn|name=NNC-VQL-more-details|See more detailed quotations in ''Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography''{{sfn|Nguyen-Ngoc-Chau|Vu-Quoc-Loc|2023}}}}-->


<!--Bernard. B. Fall (1966), The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis, Praeger, New York. p.57-->
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! width="100%" |
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> General Wedemeyer's orders not to aid the French came directly from the War Department. Apparently it was American policy then that French Indochina would not be returned to the French. The American government was interested in seeing the French forcibly ejected from Indochina so the problem of postwar separation from their colony would be easier. . . . While American transports in China avoided Indochina, the British flew aerial supply missions for the French all the way from Calcutta, dropping tommy guns, grenades and mortars.  <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | ---Bernard B. Fall (1966), [https://archive.org/details/twovietnams0000unse/page/n7/mode/2up ''The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis''], p.57.<!--{{sfn|Fall|1966|p=57}}--><ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:57</sup>
|}
</blockquote>


Three months after Roosevelt's death, at the Potsdam Conference in 1945 July, the US adopted a neutral stance regarding the French return to Indochina: "The United States would not obstruct the restoration of French sovereignty, but neither would it give active backing,"<ref name=Lawrence.2007b/><sup>:112</sup> contrary to what the British had hoped for, which was "active American support of French aims" of reconquering Indochina.<ref name=Lawrence.2007b/><sup>:111</sup> Still, the partition of Indochina, with the Chinese in the north of the 16th parallel, and the British in the south, represented a "significant British victory," since London now had "an opportunity to reinstall a French military and administrative presence below the sixteenth parallel, a foothold that France could presumably exploit to recover the rest of the country from Chinese control."<ref name=Lawrence.2007b/><sup>:112</sup> 


<!--{{Image|OSS Deer Team Vietnam-American Army.jpg|center|650px|"Vietnam-America troops," 1945 Aug 16.}}-->
[[File:OSS Deer Team Vietnam-American Army.jpg|thumb|650px|center|The Deer Team and the Viet Minh, the "Vietnam-America troops,"<sup>[[#Vietnam-America troops |N.vat]]</sup><span id="Vietnam-America troops jump"></span> 1945 Aug 16, on their way to attack a Japanese garrison at Thai Nguyen before reaching Hanoi.]]


On the other hand, if the US had let the British control the whole of Indochina, the French would "most likely have been able to oust Ho Chi Minh's revolutionary government from Hanoi in the fall of 1945, thus immediately provoking general warfare."<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:23</sup>
It was "the presence of a large Chinese army that allowed the Viet Minh to establish itself as the leading force in the new republic, with a legitimate claim to representing the southern part of the nation as well,"<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:23</sup> where [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] had joined the Viet Minh to fight the French.


<!--
<!--
Line 395: Line 473:


=== War began ===
=== War began ===
[[File:Wedemeyer in China 1945 b.png|thumb|right|150px|US Gen. [[Wikipedia:Albert C. Wedemeyer|Albert C. Wedemeyer]], China, 1945]]
Two camps of historians chose two different dates for the start of the First Indochina War: Either 1945 Sep 23 (one year ''before'' the failed Fontainebleau conference in 1946 Sep), or more than a year later, 1946 Dec 19 (three months ''after'' the failed Fontainebleau conference in 1946 Sep). Of these two dates, 1945 Sep 23 is more relevant to [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] since he had been captured on 1946 Aug 25,<ref name=NNC.VQL.2023/> before 1946 Dec 19.
Under US President [[Wikipedia:Franklin D. Roosevelt|Franklin D. Roosevelt]], the US policy was to remove the French colonists from Indochina,<!--{{sfn|Fall|1966|p=57}}--><ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:57</sup> <sup>[[#NNC-VQL-more-details |N.bq1]]</sup><span id="NNC-VQL-more-details jump1"></span> as the French official [[Wikipedia:Jean Sainteny|Jean Sainteny]] lamented that he was "face to face with a deliberate Allied maneuver to evict the French from Indochina and that at the present time the Allied attitude is more harmful than that of the [[Wikipedia:Viet-Minh|Viet-Minh]]".<!--{{sfn|Fall|1966|p=68–69}}--><ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:68–69</sup> <sup>[[#NNC-VQL-more-details |N.bq2]]</sup><span id="NNC-VQL-more-details jump2"></span>
 
<!--{{efn|name=NNC-VQL-more-details|See more detailed quotations in ''Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography''{{sfn|Nguyen-Ngoc-Chau|Vu-Quoc-Loc|2023}}}}-->
==== 1945 Sep 23, Cochin China ====
The First Indochina War started on 1945 September 23 in Cochin China (south Vietnam) with the brutal repression of the Vietnamese by some 1,400 French soldiers, who had been imprisoned by the Japanese, then freed and re-armed by British General Gracey, and who went on a rampage, beating, lynching any Vietnamese they saw on the street.<!--{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=115}}--><ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:115</sup>  
 
French war correspondent Germaine Krull, who arrived in Saigon on 1945 Sep 12 with the British Gurkhas soldiers and a small group of French soldiers,<sup>[[#British-French arrived |N.bfa]]</sup><span id="British-French arrived jump"></span> was likely the first to mark the start of the First Indochina War on this date, as she described in her "most graphic, vivid, and absorbing" report<sup>[[#Moffat memo on Krull |N.mok]]</sup><span id="Moffat memo on Krull jump"></span> what she had witnessed "with her own eyes":
<blockquote>
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
|-
! width="100%" |
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> It is impossible to describe this day, which marked the beginning of the war in Indo-China.  I saw everything with my own eyes - Annamites [Vietnamese] tied up, some of them tortured, drunken officers and soldiers with smoking guns.  On the Rue Catinat, I saw soldiers driving before them a group of Annamites bound, slave-fashion, to a long rope. Women spat in their faces. They were on the verge of being lynched.
 
In more distant sections I saw French soldiers come out of Annamite houses with stolen shoes and shirts… From time to time, an Annamite dwelling would burst into flame. Women and children were fleeing. That night, French soldiers strolled on the Rue Catinat, a gun on one arm, a woman on the other. I have never been so deeply ashamed as on that day of September 23rd. When I returned to the hotel, the faces of the English were expressionless and conversations stopped as I went by. I remember the horror and shame I had felt in June of 1940 when Vichy was established, but never in my life had I felt such utter sadness and degradation as on this night.
 
That night I realized only too well what a serious mistake we had made and how grave the consequences would be. It was the beginning of a ruthless war. Instead of regaining our prestige we had lost it forever, and worse still, we had lost the trust of the few remaining Annamites who believed in us. We had showed them that the new France was even more to be feared than the old one.
<span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | ---Germaine Krull (1945),  ''Diary of Saigon, following the Allied occupation in September 1945''.<ref name=Krull.1945/><sup>:19</sup>
|}
</blockquote>
 
{| class="wikitable style="text-align: center;"
|+ "Are you going to fight to kick out the French, or are you going to be a French puppet?"
|-
! French colonists tied up a Vietnamese, choked him, pulled his hair, and threw him onto a military truck
|-
| <gallery mode=packed widths="260" heights="100">
File:French tied up, choked Vietnamese - 1450.JPG|Video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=14m50s 14:50].
File:French tied up, choked Vietnamese - 1453.JPG|Video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=14m52s 14:52].
File:French tied up, choked Vietnamese - 1456.JPG|Video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=14m55s 14:55].
File:French tied up, choked Vietnamese - 1455.JPG|Video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=15m00s 15:00].
File:French tied up, choked Vietnamese - 1500.JPG|Video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=15m01s 15:01].
</gallery>
|-
| style="text-align: left;" | In the 1968 Documentary [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo In the Year of the Pig], time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=14m38s 14:38], [[Wikipedia:David Halberstam|David Halberstam]] said: "... the Indochina war and all the best and most talented Vietnamese of a generation had faced, in 1946 and 1947, the alternative of the French or the Viet Minh. The best of a generation, the kind of young men who would join up the day after Pearl Harbor in this country [United States]. Are you going to fight to kick out the French, or are you going to be a French puppet? So the most talented people of a generation all signed up and the Viet Minh won this war and it was an enormously popular national war."
|}


<!--Bernard. B. Fall (1966), The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis, Praeger, New York. p.57-->
This date, 1945 Sep 23, "would go down in history: [[Wikipedia:vi:Trần_Văn_Giàu|Trần Văn Giàu]],  
a key communist leader of the southern Viet Minh, announced that
"the war of Resistance has begun!" Vietnam's armed struggle against
the French had started. It would last nine more years."<ref name=McHale.2021/><sup>:45</sup> Giau issued the following call for armed struggle to throw out the French, addressing to his Vietnamese compatriots, including those who were working for the French colons like [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]]:
<blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
{| cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0
Line 405: Line 520:
! width="100%" |  
! width="100%" |  
|-
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span> General Wedemeyer's orders not to aid the French came directly from the War Department. Apparently it was American policy then that French Indochina would not be returned to the French. The American government was interested in seeing the French forcibly ejected from Indochina so the problem of postwar separation from their colony would be easier. . . . While American transports in China avoided Indochina, the British flew aerial supply missions for the French all the way from Calcutta, dropping tommy guns, grenades and mortars. <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: justify;" | <span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❝</span>Compatriots of the South!
People of Saigon!
Workers, farmers, youth, self-defense, militia, soldiers!
 
Last night, the French colonialists occupied our government headquarters in the center of Saigon.
Thus, France began to invade our country once again.
 
<!--{{Image|1945 Sep 2 Independence of Death.JPG|right|350px|Add image caption here.}}-->
[[File:1945 Sep 2 Independence of Death.JPG|thumb|right|350px|Demonstration with banner "Vietnam Independent, Independence or Death," 1945 August.]]
On September 2,<sup>[[#Vietnam Indepence Day |N.vid]]</sup><span id="Vietnam Indepence Day jump"></span> our compatriots swore to sacrifice their last drop of blood to protect the independence of the Fatherland:
 
"Independence or death!"
 
Today, the Resistance Committee calls on:
All compatriots, old, young, men, and women, take up arms and rush to fight off the invaders.
Anyone who does not have a duty assigned by the Resistance Committee must immediately leave the city. Those who remain must:
 
– Not work, not serve as soldiers for the French.
<br>
– Not show the way, not inform the French.
<br>
– Not sell food to the French.
<br>
– Find the French colonialists and destroy them.
<br>
– Burn all French offices, vehicles, ships, warehouses, and factories.
 
Saigon occupied by the French must become a Saigon without electricity, without water, without markets, without shops.
 
Fellow countrymen!
From this moment on, our top priority is to destroy the French invaders and their henchmen.
Fellow soldiers, militiamen, and self-defense members! Hold your weapons firmly in your hands, charge forward to drive out the French colonialists, and save the country.
 
The resistance war has begun!
 
Morning of September 23, 1945
<br>
Chairman of the Southern Resistance Committee
<br>
TRAN VAN GIAU
<span style="font-size:150%; color:blue">❞</span>
|-
|-
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | ---Bernard B. Fall (1966), [https://archive.org/details/twovietnams0000unse/page/n7/mode/2up ''The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis''], p.57.<!--{{sfn|Fall|1966|p=57}}--><ref name=Fall.1966/><sup>:57</sup>
| style="padding: 0 1.5em; text-align: right;" | ---Trần Văn Giàu 2011, [https://www.diendan.org/tai-lieu/hoi-ky-t-v-giau/hk-tvg-xvii HỒI KÝ TRẦN VĂN GIÀU (XVII)] [Memoirs of Tran Van Giau, Vol.17], [https://www.diendan.org/ diendan.org].  [https://web.archive.org/web/20230327082251/https://www.diendan.org/tai-lieu/hoi-ky-t-v-giau/hk-tvg-xvii/ Internet Archive 2023.03.27]
|}
|}
</blockquote>
</blockquote>


"Thus began, it could be argued, the Vietnamese war of liberation against France. It would take several more months before the struggle would extend to the entire south, and more than a year before it also engulfed Hanoi and the north, which is why historians typically date the start of the war as late 1946 [Dec 19].<!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=xii}}--><ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:xii</sup> But this date, September 23, 1945, may be as plausible a start date as any."<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:115</sup>


<span style="background-color:yellow">I AM HERE 24.10.29.</span>
<span style="background-color:yellow">I AM HERE 24.11.21.</span>
Text commented out in this section to debug references listed, but not cited.
Text commented out in this section to debug references listed, but not cited.


<!--
<!--
The First Indochina War started on 1945 September 23 with the brutal repression of the Vietnamese by some 1,400 French soldiers, who had been imprisoned by the Japanese, then freed and re-armed by British General Gracey, and who went on a rampage, beating, lynching any Vietnamese they saw on the street.{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=115}} ["Thus began, it could be argued, the Vietnamese war of liberation against France. It would take several more months before the struggle would extend to the entire south, and more than a year before it also engulfed Hanoi and the north, which is why historians typically date the start of the war as late 1946 [Dec 19].{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=xii}} But this date, September 23, 1945, may be as plausible a start date as any."]
 


The situation in [[Tonkin]] ([[North Vietnam]]) in March 1946 was as follows:
The situation in [[Tonkin]] ([[North Vietnam]]) in March 1946 was as follows:
Line 427: Line 583:
Yet, the French hawkish colonists in [[Cochinchina]] ([[South Vietnam]]){{em dash}}led by the "warmonger"{{efn|name=warmongers}} triumvirate "High Commissioner Admiral Georges Thierry d'Argenlieu (the "Bloody Monk"),{{efn|"As dubbed by the left-wing press in Paris".{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=163}}}} Supreme Commander General Jean-Etienne Valluy, and Federal Commissioner of Political Affairs Léon Pignon"{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}}{{efn|name=warmongers|"The main warmongers, who must bear the brunt of the responsibility, not only for the seizure of Haiphong in November, but also for the outbreak in Hanoi, were a French triumvirate in Saigon..."{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|loc=pp. 5–6}}---took a "gigantic gamble in dispatching an invasion force to the port city of Haiphong",{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} fell into the "Chinese trap",{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} in which the Chinese with a superior army forced both the French and the Vietnamese to sign the March 6 Agreement,{{efn|"Arriving at Haiphong in the morning of March 6, the French fleet sailed right into a Chinese trap. The French thought they had secured Chinese support for disembarking troops in the north in a treaty signed in Chongqing on February 28, but Chiang Kai-shek's government fooled them. When the French ships approached Haiphong harbor, the Chinese stood ready to resist the French onslaught and actually fired at the ships.  Meanwhile, the Chinese were pressuring both the Vietnamese government and a French team of negotiators in Hanoi to sign a deal on behalf of their two nations.  Neither the French nor the [[Democratic Republic of Vietnam|DRV]] could afford an open confrontation with China."{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=5}}<sup>, p.5</sup>}} which "was simply an armistice that provided a transient illusion of agreement where actually no agreement existed".{{sfn|Hammer|1954|p=157}}
Yet, the French hawkish colonists in [[Cochinchina]] ([[South Vietnam]]){{em dash}}led by the "warmonger"{{efn|name=warmongers}} triumvirate "High Commissioner Admiral Georges Thierry d'Argenlieu (the "Bloody Monk"),{{efn|"As dubbed by the left-wing press in Paris".{{sfn|Logevall|2012|p=163}}}} Supreme Commander General Jean-Etienne Valluy, and Federal Commissioner of Political Affairs Léon Pignon"{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}}{{efn|name=warmongers|"The main warmongers, who must bear the brunt of the responsibility, not only for the seizure of Haiphong in November, but also for the outbreak in Hanoi, were a French triumvirate in Saigon..."{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|loc=pp. 5–6}}---took a "gigantic gamble in dispatching an invasion force to the port city of Haiphong",{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} fell into the "Chinese trap",{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} in which the Chinese with a superior army forced both the French and the Vietnamese to sign the March 6 Agreement,{{efn|"Arriving at Haiphong in the morning of March 6, the French fleet sailed right into a Chinese trap. The French thought they had secured Chinese support for disembarking troops in the north in a treaty signed in Chongqing on February 28, but Chiang Kai-shek's government fooled them. When the French ships approached Haiphong harbor, the Chinese stood ready to resist the French onslaught and actually fired at the ships.  Meanwhile, the Chinese were pressuring both the Vietnamese government and a French team of negotiators in Hanoi to sign a deal on behalf of their two nations.  Neither the French nor the [[Democratic Republic of Vietnam|DRV]] could afford an open confrontation with China."{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=5}}<sup>, p.5</sup>}} which "was simply an armistice that provided a transient illusion of agreement where actually no agreement existed".{{sfn|Hammer|1954|p=157}}
Indeed, after a short period following a "modus vivendi", the [[First Indochina War]] started on 1946 December 19.{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}}{{efn|There are several different interpretations by respected historians (such as Fall, Hammer, Devillers, and Tønnesson) on how the [[First Indochina War]] started on 1946 December 19.{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=5}}{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=262, Note 10}} }}<sup>, p.5 and Note 10 on p.262</sup>
Indeed, after a short period following a "modus vivendi", the [[First Indochina War]] started on 1946 December 19.{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}}{{efn|There are several different interpretations by respected historians (such as Fall, Hammer, Devillers, and Tønnesson) on how the [[First Indochina War]] started on 1946 December 19.{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=5}}{{sfn|Tønnesson|2010|p=262, Note 10}} }}<sup>, p.5 and Note 10 on p.262</sup>
-->
-->


Line 433: Line 588:
* Brutal repression by British and French forces in Cochinchina (South Vietnam)
* Brutal repression by British and French forces in Cochinchina (South Vietnam)
* Quotations from Tønnesson (2010){{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} and Donaldson (1996){{sfn|Donaldson|1996}}
* Quotations from Tønnesson (2010){{sfn|Tønnesson|2010}} and Donaldson (1996){{sfn|Donaldson|1996}}
==== 1946 Dec 19, Tonkin ====


=== Resistance ===
=== Resistance ===
Line 444: Line 601:
<!--{{plain link|url=https://www.google.com/maps/place/C%E1%BA%A7u+Nhu+Gia,+M%E1%BB%B9+Xuy%C3%AAn,+S%C3%B3c+Tr%C4%83ng,+Vietnam/@9.5026064,105.8508548,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x31a1ab6d2c09bbf7:0x4c0acc20832a1059!8m2!3d9.5026064!4d105.8530435!16s%2Fg%2F1v41xyrv|name=Nhu-Gia Bridge}}-->[https://www.google.com/maps/place/C%E1%BA%A7u+Nhu+Gia,+M%E1%BB%B9+Xuy%C3%AAn,+S%C3%B3c+Tr%C4%83ng,+Vietnam/@9.5026064,105.8508548,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x31a1ab6d2c09bbf7:0x4c0acc20832a1059!8m2!3d9.5026064!4d105.8530435!16s%2Fg%2F1v41xyrv Nhu-Gia Bridge] in [[Wikipedia:Soc Trang|Soc Trang]], etc., blocking the advance of French forces directed by General Valluy and General Nyo, who were under the general command of General [[Wikipedia:Philippe_Leclerc_de_Hauteclocque|Philippe Leclerc]], commander of the [[Wikipedia:French Far East Expeditionary Corps|French Far East Expeditionary Corps]] (''Corps expéditionnaire français en Extrême-Orient'', CEFEO).
<!--{{plain link|url=https://www.google.com/maps/place/C%E1%BA%A7u+Nhu+Gia,+M%E1%BB%B9+Xuy%C3%AAn,+S%C3%B3c+Tr%C4%83ng,+Vietnam/@9.5026064,105.8508548,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x31a1ab6d2c09bbf7:0x4c0acc20832a1059!8m2!3d9.5026064!4d105.8530435!16s%2Fg%2F1v41xyrv|name=Nhu-Gia Bridge}}-->[https://www.google.com/maps/place/C%E1%BA%A7u+Nhu+Gia,+M%E1%BB%B9+Xuy%C3%AAn,+S%C3%B3c+Tr%C4%83ng,+Vietnam/@9.5026064,105.8508548,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x31a1ab6d2c09bbf7:0x4c0acc20832a1059!8m2!3d9.5026064!4d105.8530435!16s%2Fg%2F1v41xyrv Nhu-Gia Bridge] in [[Wikipedia:Soc Trang|Soc Trang]], etc., blocking the advance of French forces directed by General Valluy and General Nyo, who were under the general command of General [[Wikipedia:Philippe_Leclerc_de_Hauteclocque|Philippe Leclerc]], commander of the [[Wikipedia:French Far East Expeditionary Corps|French Far East Expeditionary Corps]] (''Corps expéditionnaire français en Extrême-Orient'', CEFEO).
Between 1946 March 6, when the March 6 Accords were signed,<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a3]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump3"></span> and 1946 December 19, when most historians used as the date that started the First Indochina War, in Cochinchina, the military situation did not favor the Vietnamese.
Between 1946 March 6, when the March 6 Accords were signed,<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a3]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump3"></span> and 1946 December 19, when most historians used as the date that started the First Indochina War, in Cochinchina, the military situation did not favor the Vietnamese.
[[Wikipedia:Ellen Hammer|Ellen J. Hammer]] was the first American-born historian<sup>[[#Virginia Thompson |N.vt]]</sup><span id="Virginia Thompson jump"></span> with a deep knowledge of the French colonial rule in Indochina in the early 1950s during the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]].  Dr. Hammer's<!--{{sfn|Pace|2001}}--><ref name=Pace.2001/> <sup>[[#Ellen Hammer |N.ejh]]</sup><span id="Ellen Hammer jump"></span>
highly influential book titled ''The Struggle for Indochina''<!--{{sfn|Hammer|1954}}--><ref name="Hammer.1954"/> <sup>[[#Hammer (1954) |N.ehb]]</sup><span id="Hammer (1954) jump"></span>
<!--{{em dash}}-->---published in 1954 well before the United States sent American troops to Vietnam in the 1960s<!--{{em dash}}-->---described the events, politics, and historic personalities leading to the [[Wikipedia:First Indochina War|First Indochina War]].  Her works were considered among the must-read books by respected historians on Vietnam history, as Osborne (1967)<!--{{sfn|Osborne|1967}}--><ref name="Osborne.1967"/> wrote: "Indeed, any serious student of Viet-Nam will have either read Devillers,<sup>[[#Devillers ref |N.pd]]</sup><span id="Devillers ref jump"></span>
[[Wikipedia:Jean Lacouture|Lacouture]], [[Wikipedia:Bernard B. Fall|Fall]], [[Wikipedia:Ellen Hammer|Hamme]]r and Lancaster's<ref name=Lancaster.1961/>
<sup>[[#Lancaster book |N.dlb]]</sup><span id="Lancaster book jump"></span>
studies already, or will be better served by reading them first hand."  To give a historical context within which [[Nguyen Ngoc Bich|Bich]] fought the French colonists, there is no better English source to begin than Dr. Hammer's Vietnam-history book.


<blockquote>  
<blockquote>  
Line 618: Line 768:
<!--<sup>[[#Bao Dai abdication|N.bda]]</sup><span id="Bao Dai abdication jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Bao Dai abdication|N.bda]]</sup><span id="Bao Dai abdication jump"></span>-->
<span id="Bao Dai abdication"></span>
<span id="Bao Dai abdication"></span>
* (↑ [[#Bao Dai abdication jump|N.bda]]) <i>Bao Dai abdication:</i> Under the pressure of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]],<!--{sfn|Patti|1980|pp=186-187}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:186-187</sup> [[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]] had decided to abdicate on 1945 Aug 24,<!--{sfn|Patti|1980|pp=186-187}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:186-187</sup> composed the Imperial Rescript of abdication dated and signed on 1945 Aug 25,<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:140</sup> and abdicated officially on 1945 Aug 30.<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup> [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] then appointed "Mr. Nguyen Vinh Thuy"  ([[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]]'s birth name) as "Supreme Counsellor"<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup> of the Provisional Government of Vietnam.<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup>  On 1945 Oct 22, Ho Chi Minh sent a letter to the US Secretary of State James F. Byrnes,<ref name="Ho to Byrnes.1945"/><sup>:2</sup> and attached the [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p1.jpg|Imperial Rescript of Bao Dai's abdication]] together with [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p2.jpg|Bao Dai's message to his royal clan about his abdication]], both of which were an English translation with no date, but with the recorded date as 1945 Aug 22 in the US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).  The date of 1945 Aug 25 for the [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p1.jpg|Imperial Rescript of Bao Dai's abdication]] and [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p2.jpg|Bao Dai's message to his royal clan about his abdication]], as recorded by historian Devillers (1952)<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:140</sup> is likely more reliable and correct.
* (↑ [[#Bao Dai abdication jump|N.bda]], [[#Bao Dai abdication jump2|N.bda2]]) <i>Bao Dai abdication:</i> Under the pressure of the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]],<!--{sfn|Patti|1980|pp=186-187}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:186-187</sup> [[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]] had decided to abdicate on 1945 Aug 24,<!--{sfn|Patti|1980|pp=186-187}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:186-187</sup> composed the Imperial Rescript of abdication dated and signed on 1945 Aug 25,<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:140</sup> and abdicated officially on 1945 Aug 30.<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup> [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] then appointed "Mr. Nguyen Vinh Thuy"  ([[Wikipedia:Bao Dai|Bao Dai]]'s birth name) as "Supreme Counsellor"<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup> of the Provisional Government of Vietnam.<!--{{sfn|Patti|1980|p=220}}--><ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:220</sup>  On 1945 Oct 22, Ho Chi Minh sent a letter to the US Secretary of State James F. Byrnes,<ref name="Ho to Byrnes.1945"/><sup>:2</sup> and attached the [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p1.jpg|Imperial Rescript of Bao Dai's abdication]] together with [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p2.jpg|Bao Dai's message to his royal clan about his abdication]], both of which were an English translation with no date, but with the recorded date as 1945 Aug 22 in the US National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).  The date of 1945 Aug 25 for the [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p1.jpg|Imperial Rescript of Bao Dai's abdication]] and [[Wikipedia:c:File:1945 Aug 22 Bao Dai abdication p2.jpg|Bao Dai's message to his royal clan about his abdication]], as recorded by historian Devillers (1952)<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:140</sup> is likely more reliable and correct.


<!--<sup>[[#Bao Dai quote|N.bdq]]</sup><span id="Bao Dai quote jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Bao Dai quote|N.bdq]]</sup><span id="Bao Dai quote jump"></span>-->
Line 656: Line 806:
<!--<sup>[[#Bich Viet Minh |N.bvm]]</sup><span id="Bich Viet Minh jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Bich Viet Minh |N.bvm]]</sup><span id="Bich Viet Minh jump"></span> -->
<span id="Bich Viet Minh"></span>
<span id="Bich Viet Minh"></span>
* (↑ [[#Bich Viet Minh jump |N.bvm]]) <i>Bich Viet Minh:</i> That Bich joined the Viet Minh in 1945 was mentioned in a French PhD dissertation with page image provided in ''Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911-1966): A Biography.''<ref name=NNC.VQL.2023/>
* (↑ [[#Bich Viet Minh jump |N.bvm]]) <i>Bich Viet Minh:</i> The Viet Minh is "nationalist front organization with many non-communist members, but under communist domination, most clearly at the level of the top leadership."<ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:23</sup> That Bich joined the Viet Minh in 1945 was mentioned in a French PhD dissertation with page image provided in ''Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911-1966): A Biography.''<ref name=NNC.VQL.2023/>
 
<!--<sup>[[#British-French arrived |N.bfa]]</sup><span id="British-French arrived jump"></span>-->
<span id="British-French arrived"></span>
* (↑ [[#British-French arrived jump |N.bvm]]) <i>British-French arrived:</i> "Depuis le 12 septembre [1945] en effet,par petits paquets, les troupes alliées arrivent par avion : une compagnie française du 5ème RIC, un bataillon gurkha de la 20ème division indienne du général Douglas D. Gracey, que Mount­batten a désignée pour opérer le désarmement des Japonais en Indochine du Sud."<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:156</sup>  


<!--
<!--
Line 702: Line 856:
<!--<sup>[[#d'Argenlieu recall |N.dar]]</sup><span id="d'Argenlieu recall jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#d'Argenlieu recall |N.dar]]</sup><span id="d'Argenlieu recall jump"></span> -->
<span id="d'Argenlieu recall"></span>
<span id="d'Argenlieu recall"></span>
* (↑ [[#d'Argenlieu recall jump |N.dar]]) <i>D'Argenlieu recalled:</i> D'Argenlieu was recalled back to France because of the intense dislike that he caused among the Vietnamese and among the Socialists and Communists in France,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/394/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22abomination+of+Viet+Nam%22 394]</sup> who gave him the nickname "The Bloody Monk,"<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/162/mode/2up?q=%22bloody+monk%22&view=theater 163]</sup> who was "widely believed to have sparked the war with his aggressive actions in 1946, in clear violation of the March 6 Accords [1946] and without informing Paris, [by recognizing] the autonomous 'Republic of Cochin China' in the name of France."<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/136/mode/2up?q=%22of+the+March+6+Accords%22%22&view=theater 137],[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/180/mode/2up?q=%22of+the+March+6+Accords%22%22&view=theater 180],[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/188/mode/2up?q=%22sparked+the+war+with+his+aggressive%22&view=theater 189]</sup>  Such recognition went against the stipulation of a referendum for the unification of the three regions ("Kỳ", i.e., Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin) in the March 6 Accords.<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a2]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump2"></span> D'Argenlieu was also known as the "abomination of Vietnam,"<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/394/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22abomination+of+Viet+Nam%22 394]</sup> whom Bao Dai was averse to have any dealings with.
* (↑ [[#d'Argenlieu recall jump |N.dar]], [[#d'Argenlieu recall jump2 |N.dar2]]) <i>D'Argenlieu recalled:</i> D'Argenlieu was recalled back to France because of the intense dislike that he caused among the Vietnamese and among the Socialists and Communists in France,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/394/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22abomination+of+Viet+Nam%22 394]</sup> who gave him the nickname "The Bloody Monk,"<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/162/mode/2up?q=%22bloody+monk%22&view=theater 163]</sup> who was "widely believed to have sparked the war with his aggressive actions in 1946, in clear violation of the March 6 Accords [1946] and without informing Paris, [by recognizing] the autonomous 'Republic of Cochin China' in the name of France."<ref name=Logevall.2012/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/136/mode/2up?q=%22of+the+March+6+Accords%22%22&view=theater 137],[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/180/mode/2up?q=%22of+the+March+6+Accords%22%22&view=theater 180],[https://archive.org/details/embersofwarfallo0000loge/page/188/mode/2up?q=%22sparked+the+war+with+his+aggressive%22&view=theater 189]</sup>  Such recognition went against the stipulation of a referendum for the unification of the three regions ("Kỳ", i.e., Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin) in the March 6 Accords.<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a2]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump2"></span> D'Argenlieu was also known as the "abomination of Vietnam,"<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:[https://archive.org/details/whyvietnamprelud0000patt/page/394/mode/2up?view=theater&q=%22abomination+of+Viet+Nam%22 394]</sup> whom Bao Dai was averse to have any dealings with.


<span id="de Gaulle"></span>
<span id="de Gaulle"></span>
Line 713: Line 867:
<span id="Devillers ref"></span>
<span id="Devillers ref"></span>
* (↑ [[#Devillers ref jump |N.pd]]) <i>(Philippe) Devillers:</i>  See <!--[[w:French_Cochinchina#cite_note-41|French Cochinchina, Ref. 40]]
* (↑ [[#Devillers ref jump |N.pd]]) <i>(Philippe) Devillers:</i>  See <!--[[w:French_Cochinchina#cite_note-41|French Cochinchina, Ref. 40]]
--> [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_Cochinchina&oldid=1247806900#cite_note-43 French Cochinchina, version 03:16, 26 September 2024, Ref.42]: Philippe Devillers, ''Histoire du Viêt-Nam de 1940 à 1952'', Seuil, 1952, and [https://indomemoires.hypotheses.org/21651 Philippe Devillers (1920–2016), un secret nommé Viêt-Nam, Mémoires d'Indochine], [https://web.archive.org/web/20220629093316/https://indomemoires.hypotheses.org/21651 Internet archived 2022.06.29].
--> [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_Cochinchina&oldid=1247806900#cite_note-43 French Cochinchina, version 03:16, 26 September 2024, Ref.42]: Philippe Devillers, ''Histoire du Viêt-Nam de 1940 à 1952'', Seuil, 1952, and [https://indomemoires.hypotheses.org/21651 Philippe Devillers (1920–2016), un secret nommé Viêt-Nam, Mémoires d'Indochine], [https://web.archive.org/web/20220629093316/https://indomemoires.hypotheses.org/21651 Internet archived 2022.06.29].  See Devillers speaking in an interview in the 1968 documentary ''In the Year of the Pig'' at video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=5m58s 5:58].


<!--<sup>[[#Devillers incorrect info |N.dii]]</sup><span id="Devillers incorrect info jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Devillers incorrect info |N.dii]]</sup><span id="Devillers incorrect info jump"></span>-->
Line 744: Line 898:
<!--<sup>[[#US Ambassador Hurley |N.uah]]</sup><span id="US Ambassador Hurley jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#US Ambassador Hurley |N.uah]]</sup><span id="US Ambassador Hurley jump"></span>-->
<span id="US Ambassador Hurley"></span>
<span id="US Ambassador Hurley"></span>
* (↑ [[#US Ambassador Hurley jump |N.uah]]) <i>Hurley, US Ambassador:</i> Patrick Hurley was identified as "Major Gen. Patrick J. Hurley,"<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:13</sup> a “personal representative” in China for Roosevelt,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:15</sup> and then “Ambassador Hurley” by 1945 Mar 9.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:63</sup>  Until around 1944 Nov 1-17, the US Ambassador to China was Clarence E. Gauss,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:15</sup>who resigned, and Gen. Hurley was appointed as US Ambassador.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:453</sup> Thus, Patrick Hurley was correctly referred to as Roosevelt’s "ambassador to China" when Truman was president, after Roosevelt had died:<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:66</sup> "On [1945] March 8, the day before the Japanese struck against the French, Roosevelt gave separate audiences in the White House to his ambas­sador to China, Patrick Hurley; the commander of the China theatre  
* (↑ [[#US Ambassador Hurley jump |N.uah]]) <i>Hurley, US Ambassador:</i> Patrick Hurley was identified as "Major Gen. Patrick J. Hurley,"<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:13</sup> a “personal representative” in China for Roosevelt,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:15</sup> and then “Ambassador Hurley” by 1945 Mar 9.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:63</sup>  Until around 1944 Nov 1-17, the US Ambassador to China was Clarence E. Gauss,<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:15</sup>who resigned, and Gen. Hurley was appointed as US Ambassador.<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:453</sup> Thus, Patrick Hurley was correctly referred to as Roosevelt’s "ambassador to China" when Truman was president, after Roosevelt had died:<ref name=Tonnesson.2007/><sup>:66</sup> "On [1945] March 8, the day before the Japanese struck against the French, Roosevelt gave separate audiences in the White House to his ambas­sador to China, Patrick Hurley; the commander of the China theatre forces, General Albert C. Wedemeyer; and Admiral William F. Halsey, who had raided the Indochina coast on January 12."  
forces, General Albert C. Wedemeyer; and Admiral William F. Halsey,  
who had raided the Indochina coast on January 12."  


<span id="Ellen Hammer"></span>
<span id="Ellen Hammer"></span>
Line 768: Line 920:
<!--<sup>[[#Ho communist nationalist|N.hcn]]</sup><span id="Ho communist nationalist jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Ho communist nationalist|N.hcn]]</sup><span id="Ho communist nationalist jump"></span> -->
<span id="Ho communist nationalist"></span>
<span id="Ho communist nationalist"></span>
* (↑ [[#Ho communist nationalist jump|N.hcn]]) <i>Ho, communist or nationalist?</i> "For many decades there would be a heated debate among diplomats, politicians and political scientists in every corner of the world as to whether [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a communist or a nationalist. The answer is that he was both."<ref name=Tonnesson.1991/><sup>:120</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=120}} -->
* (↑ [[#Ho communist nationalist jump|N.hcn]]) <i>Ho, communist or nationalist?</i> "For many decades there would be a heated debate among diplomats, politicians and political scientists in every corner of the world as to whether [[Ho Chi Minh]] was a communist or a nationalist. The answer is that he was both."<ref name=Tonnesson.1991/><sup>:120</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=120}} -->  This view is consistent with that of Jean Sainteny who wrote in his 1972 memoir: "I have been asked countless times, `Was Ho Chi Minh pri­marily a Nationalist or a Communist?' My reply is always the same: Ho Chi Minh was both. For him nationalism and communism were, respectively, goal and the means to attain that goal. The two complemented each other, merged."<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:20</sup>


<!--<sup>[[#Ho gave pistols |N.hgp]]</sup><span id="Ho gave pistols jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Ho gave pistols |N.hgp]]</sup><span id="Ho gave pistols jump"></span> -->
<span id="Ho gave pistols"></span>
<span id="Ho gave pistols"></span>
* (↑ [[#Ho gave pistols jump |N.hgp]]) <i>Ho gave pistols:</i> That Ho gave the new pistols to his rivals, but not to his own people, testified to his political acumen in rallying his rivals to accept him as the top leader.<ref name="VQL.2023a"/><!--{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}-->
* (↑ [[#Ho gave pistols jump |N.hgp]]) <i>Ho gave pistols:</i> That Ho gave the new pistols to his rivals, but not to his own people, testified to his political acumen in rallying his rivals to accept him as the top leader.<ref name="VQL.2023a"/><!--{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}-->
<!--{{Image|Ho Chi Minh and Sainteny on Catalina 1945 Mar 24.JPG|right|350px|Add image caption here.}}-->
[[File:Ho Chi Minh and Sainteny on Catalina 1945 Mar 24.JPG|thumb|right|150px|Ho Chi Minh and Sainteny on the seaplane ''Catalina,'' on their way to meet d'Argenlieu on the battleship ''Emile-Bertin'',  1946 Mar 24.]]
<!--<sup>[[#HCM Sainteny Catalina |N.hsc]]</sup><span id="HCM Sainteny Catalina jump"></span>-->
<span id="HCM Sainteny Catalina"></span>
* (↑ [[#HCM Sainteny Catalina jump |N.hsc]]) <i>Ho and Sainteny on Catalina:</i>  On 1946 Mar 24, Ho and Jean Saiteny boarded the seaplane ''Catalina'' that took them to meet Admiral Thierry d'Argenlieu on the French battleship ''Emile-Bertin,'' mooring in the Ha Long Bay. 
<!--<sup>[[#Ho in France 1946 |N.hif]]</sup><span id="Ho in France 1946 jump"></span>-->
<span id="Ho in France 1946"></span>
* (↑ [[#Ho in France 1946 jump |N.hif]]) <i>Ho in France 1946:</i> See Youtube video ''French involvement in Vietnam & Dien Bien Phu - 1962,'' time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWY9KbIXpdI&t=2m09s 2:09], showing the moment Ho's plane landed in Paris and the subsequent greetings the French government giving to Ho as a head of state.  Flying with Ho from Biarritz to Paris, Sainteny recalled: "At four o'clock we were over Paris. The Bourget airport was thick with crowds of people. Marius Moutet, Minister of Colonies, was there, surrounded by numerous distin­guished civilians and military notables representing the French government. Above the airport floated the associated flags of France and Vietnam."<ref name=Sainteny.1972/><sup>:76</sup>


<!--<sup>[[#Ho Tienpao prison |N.htp]]</sup><span id="Ho Tienpao prison jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Ho Tienpao prison |N.htp]]</sup><span id="Ho Tienpao prison jump"></span> -->
Line 778: Line 940:
* (↑ [[#Ho Tienpao prison jump |N.htp]]) <i>Ho in Tienpao prison:</i>  Tienpao in the [[Wikipedia:Wade-Giles|Wade-Giles]] transliteration is Tianbao in [[Wikipedia:pinyin|pinyin]].  See the analysis in ''Notes on Vietnam History.''<ref name=VQL.2023a/>
* (↑ [[#Ho Tienpao prison jump |N.htp]]) <i>Ho in Tienpao prison:</i>  Tienpao in the [[Wikipedia:Wade-Giles|Wade-Giles]] transliteration is Tianbao in [[Wikipedia:pinyin|pinyin]].  See the analysis in ''Notes on Vietnam History.''<ref name=VQL.2023a/>


{{Image|Ho Chi Minh with a horse.jpg|right|150px|Ho Chi Minh took refuge in the jungle to battle French forces.<ref name=Sainteny.1972/>.}}
<!--<sup>[[#Ho in Vietnam 1944 |N.hvn]]</sup><span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944 jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Ho in Vietnam 1944 |N.hvn]]</sup><span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944 jump"></span> -->
<span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944"></span>
<span id="Ho in Vietnam 1944"></span>
Line 790: Line 953:
* (↑ [[#Ho met OSS jump |N.hmo]]) <i>Ho met OSS:</i>  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s "mission was probably to obtain information on the development of the war, try to gain Allied recognition for his league and perhaps also secure the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] a role in a forthcoming invasion".  At the same time, [[Wikipedia:vi:Hoàng_Quốc_Việt|Hoang Quoc Viet]] carried out a similar mission in Kwangsi (now [[Wikipedia:Guangxi|Guangxi]]) with the Chinese <!--{{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}}-->[[Wikipedia:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]], who told him that "I hope we shall soon meet again in Hanoi".<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:210</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}-->  See also the [https://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_F8F9FACD595E4A74BCA28655493A1743 PBS interview with Hoang Quoc Viet in 1981].
* (↑ [[#Ho met OSS jump |N.hmo]]) <i>Ho met OSS:</i>  [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho]]'s "mission was probably to obtain information on the development of the war, try to gain Allied recognition for his league and perhaps also secure the [[Wikipedia:Viet Minh|Viet Minh]] a role in a forthcoming invasion".  At the same time, [[Wikipedia:vi:Hoàng_Quốc_Việt|Hoang Quoc Viet]] carried out a similar mission in Kwangsi (now [[Wikipedia:Guangxi|Guangxi]]) with the Chinese <!--{{lang-de|[[:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]]}}-->[[Wikipedia:de:Zhang_Fakui|Gen. Chang Fa-kwei]], who told him that "I hope we shall soon meet again in Hanoi".<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:210</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|p=210}}-->  See also the [https://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_F8F9FACD595E4A74BCA28655493A1743 PBS interview with Hoang Quoc Viet in 1981].


<!--<sup>[[#HCM Vietnam Independence |N.hvi]]</sup><span id="HCM Vietnam Independence jump"></span>-->
<span id="HCM Vietnam Independence "></span>
* (↑ [[#HCM Vietnam Independence  jump |N.hvi]]) <i>HCM Vietnam Independence :</i>  For a detailed comparative analysis between the US Declaration of Independence and Ho Chi Minh’s Declaration of Vietnam Independence, see ''Notes of Vietnam History''.<ref name=VQL.2023a/>  "Bao Dai, the French-protected emperor of Annam, with nominal authority also in Tonkin, had gained nominal independence aer Japan ousted the French regime in March 1945. When he abdicated voluntarily in August 1945, he ceded his powers to the new Democratic Republic.  Shortly before Bao Dai abdicated, his government had obtained from Japan something that France had always refused to concede: sovereignty also in Nam Ky (Cochinchina), hitherto under direct French rule, where the emperor had previously had no say." <ref name=Tonnesson.2010/><sup>:12</sup>
<!--<sup>[[#Jean Lacouture spoke |N.jls]]</sup><span id="Jean Lacouture spoke jump"></span>-->
<span id="Jean Lacouture spoke"></span>
* (↑ [[#Jean Lacouture spoke jump |N.jls]]) <i>(Jean) Lacouture spoke:</i> See Lacouture speaking about Ho Chi Minh in the 1968 documentary ''In the Year of the Pig'' at video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=8m11s 8:11].
<!--<sup>[[#Lancaster book |N.dlb]]</sup><span id="Lancaster book jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Lancaster book |N.dlb]]</sup><span id="Lancaster book jump"></span>-->
<span id="Lancaster book"></span>
<span id="Lancaster book"></span>
Line 797: Line 968:
<span id="Leclerc accepted assignment"></span>
<span id="Leclerc accepted assignment"></span>
* (↑ [[#Leclerc accepted assignment jump |N.laa]]) <i>Leclerc accepted assignment:</i> Devillers (1952) wrote that Leclerc accepted his assignment on 1945 May 22 to command two French divisions placed under the general command of American forces in the Pacific ("Dès lors, c’est à obtenir la participation française à cet assaut que Paris voue ses efforts. Le 26 mai, le Gouvernement français offre à Washington de mettre à la disposition du Commandement américain dans le Pacifique un Corps d'Armée à deux divisions. Le general Leclerc, chef de la prestigieuse 2ème Division Blindée, le vainqueur de Koufra, de Paris, de Strasbourg et de Berchtesgaden, le plus connu et le plus populaire des chefs militaires français, a accepté le 22 mai d’en prendre le commandement.").
* (↑ [[#Leclerc accepted assignment jump |N.laa]]) <i>Leclerc accepted assignment:</i> Devillers (1952) wrote that Leclerc accepted his assignment on 1945 May 22 to command two French divisions placed under the general command of American forces in the Pacific ("Dès lors, c’est à obtenir la participation française à cet assaut que Paris voue ses efforts. Le 26 mai, le Gouvernement français offre à Washington de mettre à la disposition du Commandement américain dans le Pacifique un Corps d'Armée à deux divisions. Le general Leclerc, chef de la prestigieuse 2ème Division Blindée, le vainqueur de Koufra, de Paris, de Strasbourg et de Berchtesgaden, le plus connu et le plus populaire des chefs militaires français, a accepté le 22 mai d’en prendre le commandement.").
<!--<sup>[[#Leclerc entered Hanoi |N.leh]]</sup><span id="Leclerc entered Hanoi jump"></span>-->
<span id="Leclerc entered Hanoi"></span>
* (↑ [[#Leclerc entered Hanoi jump |N.leh]]) <i>Leclerc entered Hanoi:</i> "Dès le premier contact, il mettra Ho Chi Minh en confiance. « Alors, Monsieur le Président, on est d’accord maintenant ? » s'écriera-t-il de sa voix dure, un peu trainante, en s'avançant la main largement ouverte vers le vieux révolutionnaire... Comme il a fait mettre à tous ses véhicules des drapeaux français et vietnamiens, il a demandé, pour sa villa, une garde mixte de 15 Francais et de 15 Viêts."<ref name=Devillers.1952/><sup>:238</sup>


<!--<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#March 6 Accords |N.m6a]]</sup><span id="March 6 Accords jump"></span> -->
Line 806: Line 981:
* (↑ [[#Minh Tan jump|N.mbl]]) <i>Minh Tan book list:</i>  A list of important books published by Minh Tan can be found in [https://archive.org/details/nguyen-ngoc-bich-1911-1966-a-biography Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography].
* (↑ [[#Minh Tan jump|N.mbl]]) <i>Minh Tan book list:</i>  A list of important books published by Minh Tan can be found in [https://archive.org/details/nguyen-ngoc-bich-1911-1966-a-biography Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography].
<!--: Back to [[#Minh Tan jump|Note]].-->
<!--: Back to [[#Minh Tan jump|Note]].-->
<!--<sup>[[#Moffat memo on Krull |N.mok]]</sup><span id="Moffat memo on Krull jump"></span>-->
<span id="Moffat memo on Krull"></span>
* (↑ [[#Moffat memo on Krull jump|N.mtl]]) <i>Moffat memo on Krull:</i>  [[Wikipedia:Abbot Low Moffat|Abbot Low Moffat]], "who headed the Division for Southeast Asian [SEA] Affairs at [the] State" [Department],<ref name=Patti.1980/><sup>:381</sup> wrote a memo on 1947 Feb 24 about Germaine Krull's 1945 report<ref name=Krull.1945/> as follows:  "The underlying diary by a former French war correspondent (Germaine Krull) describes the Allied occupation of Saigon, September 12 to 24, 1945. The report is by far the most graphic, vivid, and absorbing account of this critical period, which witnessed the beginning of the war in Indochina, which has reached SEA. Highlights have been marked in blue pencil, but the report is well worth reading in its entirety."<ref name=Krull.1945/>


<!--<sup>[[#Mountbatten to Leclerc |N.mtl]]</sup><span id="Mountbatten to Leclerc jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Mountbatten to Leclerc |N.mtl]]</sup><span id="Mountbatten to Leclerc jump"></span>-->
Line 827: Line 1,006:
<!--<sup>[[#Notes on Vietnam history |N.vnh]]</sup><span id="Notes on Vietnam history jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Notes on Vietnam history |N.vnh]]</sup><span id="Notes on Vietnam history jump"></span> -->
<span id="Notes on Vietnam history"></span>
<span id="Notes on Vietnam history"></span>
* (↑ [[#Notes on Vietnam history jump |N.vnh]], [[#Notes on Vietnam history jump2 |N.vnh2]]) <i>Notes on Vietnam history:</i> See quotations in ''Notes on Vietnam history''.<ref name=VQL.2023a/><!--{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}-->
* (↑ [[#Notes on Vietnam history jump |N.vnh]], [[#Notes on Vietnam history jump2 |N.vnh2]], [[#Notes on Vietnam history jump3 |N.vnh3]]) <i>Notes on Vietnam history:</i> See quotations in ''Notes on Vietnam history''.<ref name=VQL.2023a/><!--{{sfn|Vu Quoc Loc|2023a}}-->


<!--<sup>[[#Original writer |N.vql]]</sup><span id="Original writer jump"></span>
<!--<sup>[[#Original writer |N.vql]]</sup><span id="Original writer jump"></span>
Line 856: Line 1,035:
<span id="Virginia Thompson"></span>
<span id="Virginia Thompson"></span>
* (↑ [[#Virginia Thompson jump |N.vt]]) <i>(Virginia) Thompson</i> was the first British historian with a deep knowledge on French Indochina with her 1937 book ''[https://archive.org/details/FrenchIndoChina/page/n1/mode/2up French Indo-China]'' (Internet Archive), George Allen & Unwin LTD, London. Also see the review of this book: ''French Indo-China'' By Virginia Thompson (New York: Macmillan Company, 1937, pp.516, $5.00), [https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/43/4/876/70968 reviewed by H.I. Priestley], The American Historical Review, Volume 43, Issue 4, July 1938, Pages 876–877, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/43.4.876
* (↑ [[#Virginia Thompson jump |N.vt]]) <i>(Virginia) Thompson</i> was the first British historian with a deep knowledge on French Indochina with her 1937 book ''[https://archive.org/details/FrenchIndoChina/page/n1/mode/2up French Indo-China]'' (Internet Archive), George Allen & Unwin LTD, London. Also see the review of this book: ''French Indo-China'' By Virginia Thompson (New York: Macmillan Company, 1937, pp.516, $5.00), [https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/43/4/876/70968 reviewed by H.I. Priestley], The American Historical Review, Volume 43, Issue 4, July 1938, Pages 876–877, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/43.4.876
{{Image|1945 Apr 13 Allies flags half staff Roosevelt died.JPG|right|250px|Allied flags at half staff on 1945 Apr 13, the day after FDR died.}}
<!--<sup>[[#Truman foreign policy |N.tfp]]</sup><span id="Truman foreign policy jump"></span>-->
<span id="Truman foreign policy"></span>
* (↑ [[#Truman foreign policy jump |N.tfp]]) <i>Truman foreign policy:</i> After Roosevelt died on 1945 Apr 12, "U.S. policy fell into the hands of Truman, who had no idea what Roosevelt had really wanted to achieve or how he had planned to achieve it. Over the coming three years, Truman would take this ignorance, combined with Stalin's strategic overreach and blundering, and create the Cold War that Roosevelt had always been keen to avoid."<ref name=OBrien.2024/>


<!--<sup>[[#US invasion of Indochina |N.uii]]</sup><span id="US invasion of Indochina jump"></span> -->  
<!--<sup>[[#US invasion of Indochina |N.uii]]</sup><span id="US invasion of Indochina jump"></span> -->  
Line 864: Line 1,048:
<span id="US war plan"></span>
<span id="US war plan"></span>
* (↑ [[#US war plan jump |N.uwp]]) <i>US war plan:</i>  "... to confuse the Japanese, possibly the French as well, concerning US intentions. Perhaps Roosevelt meant the plan seriously at first, and then changed it into a deceptive operation when he realized that it could not be carried out ... Indochina came to play a similar role in Roosevelt's war against Japan as Norway occupied in Churchill's war against Germany. For a long time, Churchill toyed with the idea of a Norwegian landing as a way of securing the transport route to Russia and bringing Sweden into the war. Then, when his generals and admirals adamantly refused to carry out the project, Norway instead became the focus of elaborate deception and diversion plans, aiming at inducing Hitler to keep as many troops as possible in an irrelevant theatre."<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:170, 220</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|pp=170, 220}}-->  
* (↑ [[#US war plan jump |N.uwp]]) <i>US war plan:</i>  "... to confuse the Japanese, possibly the French as well, concerning US intentions. Perhaps Roosevelt meant the plan seriously at first, and then changed it into a deceptive operation when he realized that it could not be carried out ... Indochina came to play a similar role in Roosevelt's war against Japan as Norway occupied in Churchill's war against Germany. For a long time, Churchill toyed with the idea of a Norwegian landing as a way of securing the transport route to Russia and bringing Sweden into the war. Then, when his generals and admirals adamantly refused to carry out the project, Norway instead became the focus of elaborate deception and diversion plans, aiming at inducing Hitler to keep as many troops as possible in an irrelevant theatre."<ref name="Tonnesson.1991"/><sup>:170, 220</sup><!--{{sfn|Tønnesson|1991|pp=170, 220}}-->  
<!--<sup>[[#Vietnam-America troops |N.vat]]</sup><span id="Vietnam-America troops jump"></span>-->
<span id="Vietnam-America troops"></span>
* (↑ [[#Vietnam-America troops jump |N.vat]]) <i>Vietnam-America troops:</i>  "From the group of 110 assembled recruits, their field commander Dam Quang Trung and the Deer Team chose 40 of the 'most promising' young men to begin training immediately. The eager recruits who would be working with the Deer Team were officially christened by Ho Chi Minh the Bo Doi Viet-My, the 'Vietnamese-American Force.'"<ref name=Bartholomew-Feis.2006/><sup>:209</sup>  On "August 16, 1945, the Deer Team and the Vietnamese-American Force left Tan Trao... Both Thomas and Vo Nguyen Giap were anxious to leave for Thai Nguyen," which was on their way to Hanoi.<ref name=Bartholomew-Feis.2006/><sup>:216</sup>  When the Vietnamese-American Force attacked the Japanese garrison at Thai-Nguyen, "Nguyen Chinh remembered that the surrender document that he typed mentioned the Americans as well: 'We the Liberation Army and the Vietnam-America troops, commanded by the Viet Minh organization, already encircled tightly this garrison. We demand the [Japanese] troops  inside the garrison accept the following conditions.' "<ref name=Bartholomew-Feis.2006/><sup>:369 Note 20</sup>
<!--<sup>[[#Vietnam Indepence Day |N.vid]]</sup><span id="Vietnam Indepence Day jump"></span>-->
<span id="Vietnam Indepence Day"></span>
* (↑ [[#Vietnam Indepence Day jump |N.vid]]) <i>Vietnam Indepence Day:</i> That was 1945 Sep 2, the day Ho Chi Minh declared Vietnam's Independence, and also the day the Japanese formally surrendered on the USS Missouri.


<!--<sup>[[#Viet Minh manifesto |N.vmm]]</sup><span id="Viet Minh manifesto jump"></span> -->
<!--<sup>[[#Viet Minh manifesto |N.vmm]]</sup><span id="Viet Minh manifesto jump"></span> -->
Line 879: Line 1,071:
<!--<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump"></span>-->
<!--<sup>[[#Year of the Pig|N.ytp]]</sup><span id="Year of the Pig jump"></span>-->
<span id="Year of the Pig"></span>
<span id="Year of the Pig"></span>
* (↑ [[#Year of the Pig jump1|N.ytp1]], [[#Year of the Pig jump2|N.ytp2]]) <i>Year of the Pig:</i> In his interview in the 1968 documentary ''[[Wikipedia:In the Year of the Pig|In the Year of the Pig]],'' at the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=13m56s Youtube video time 13:56]<!--{{plain link|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=13m56s|name=Youtube video time 13:56}}-->, Paul Mus recounted: "[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] said [in 1945]<!--{{bracket|in 1945}}-->, 'I have no army.' That's not true now [in 1968]<!--{{bracket|in 1968}}-->.  'I have no army.'  1945.  'I have no finance.  I have no diplomacy.  I have no public instruction.  I have just hatred and I will not disarm it until you give me confidence in you.'  Now this is the thing on which I would insist because it's still alive in his memory, as in mine. For every time [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] has trusted us, we betrayed him."
* (↑ [[#Year of the Pig jump1|N.ytp1]], [[#Year of the Pig jump2|N.ytp2]]) <i>Year of the Pig:</i> In his interview in the 1968 documentary ''[[Wikipedia:In the Year of the Pig|In the Year of the Pig]],'' Paul Mus, whom High Commissioner d'Argenlieu sent to meet Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi at the end of 1945 (video time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=12m17s 12:17]) recounted (time [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pibqRPi8Bo&t=13m56s 13:56]): "[[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] said [in 1945], 'I have no army.' That's not true now [in 1968].  'I have no army.'  1945.  'I have no finance.  I have no diplomacy.  I have no public instruction.  I have just hatred and I will not disarm it until you give me confidence in you.'  Now this is the thing on which I would insist because it's still alive in his memory, as in mine. For every time [[Wikipedia:Ho Chi Minh|Ho Chi Minh]] has trusted us, we betrayed him." See also a 2016 review<ref name=Browder.2016/> of this 1968 documentary ''[[Wikipedia:In the Year of the Pig|In the Year of the Pig]].''


== References ==
== References ==
Line 898: Line 1,090:
Ho 1945<ref name="Ho to Byrnes.1945"/>
Ho 1945<ref name="Ho to Byrnes.1945"/>
Britannica<ref name=Britannica.VWC/>
Britannica<ref name=Britannica.VWC/>
Rotter 2007<ref name=Rotter.2007/>,
Sainteny 1972<ref name=Sainteny.1972/>
-->
-->
Marr 2013<ref name=Marr.2013/>,
Marr 2013<ref name=Marr.2013/>,
Rotter 2007<ref name=Rotter.2007/>,


<references>
<references>
Line 959: Line 1,152:
[https://web.archive.org/web/20230328065158/https://www.britannica.com/question/How-many-people-died-in-the-Vietnam-War Internet archived on 2023.03.28].
[https://web.archive.org/web/20230328065158/https://www.britannica.com/question/How-many-people-died-in-the-Vietnam-War Internet archived on 2023.03.28].
-->
-->
</ref>
<ref name=Browder.2016>
{{cite book
|last=Browder
|first=Laura
|chapter=The Meaning of the Soldier: ''In the Year of the Pig'' and ''Hearts and Minds''
|title=A Companion to the War Film
|date= May 1, 2016
|pages=356–370 |doi=10.1002/9781118337653.ch21
|url=https://scholarship.richmond.edu/english-faculty-publications/172/
|archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20240604151647/https://scholarship.richmond.edu/english-faculty-publications/172/
|archive-date=2024-06-04
}}
[http://web.archive.org/web/20240604151647/https://scholarship.richmond.edu/english-faculty-publications/172/ Internet Archive 2024.06.04]
</ref>
</ref>


Line 1,077: Line 1,285:
<ref name=Honey.1962>
<ref name=Honey.1962>
{{citation |editor=Honey, P.J. |title=Special Issue on Vietnam |journal=[[The China Quarterly]] |volume=9 |date=March 1962 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/china-quarterly/volume/0FB8E56075A0E2649EB01EC2BFB9ABFB |url-access=subscription |access-date=18 Feb 2023}}.   
{{citation |editor=Honey, P.J. |title=Special Issue on Vietnam |journal=[[The China Quarterly]] |volume=9 |date=March 1962 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/china-quarterly/volume/0FB8E56075A0E2649EB01EC2BFB9ABFB |url-access=subscription |access-date=18 Feb 2023}}.   
</ref>
<ref name=Krull.1945>
{{citation
|last=Krull
|first=Germaine
|year=1945
|title=Diary of Saigon, following the Allied occupation in September 1945 
|url=https://vva.vietnam.ttu.edu/images.php?img=/images/241/2410207001.pdf
|access-date=2024-11-03
}}. [https://web.archive.org/web/20241119010638/https://vva.vietnam.ttu.edu/images.php?img=/images/241/2410207001.pdf Internet Archive 2024.11.19]
</ref>
</ref>


Line 1,091: Line 1,310:


<ref name="Lambert.1992">
<ref name="Lambert.1992">
{{citation |last=Lambert | first=Bruce |year=1992 |title=Joseph A. Buttinger, Nazi Fighter And Vietnam Scholar, Dies at 85 |work=[[The New York Times]]  |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/nyregion/joseph-a-buttinger-nazi-fighter-and-vietnam-scholar-dies-at-85.html |url-access=subscription}}, Mar 8.
{{citation  
|last=Lambert  
|first=Bruce
|date=1992-03-08
|title=Joseph A. Buttinger, Nazi Fighter And Vietnam Scholar, Dies at 85  
|journal=[[The New York Times]]   
|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/08/nyregion/joseph-a-buttinger-nazi-fighter-and-vietnam-scholar-dies-at-85.html |url-access=subscription}}.
</ref>
</ref>


Line 1,110: Line 1,335:
|year=2007  
|year=2007  
|title=The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War |publisher=Harvard University Press, Massachusetts  
|title=The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War |publisher=Harvard University Press, Massachusetts  
}},
edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
</ref>
<ref name="Lawrence.2007b">
{{citation
|last=Lawrence
|first=Mark A.
|chapter=Forging the "Great Combination"
|pages=105-129
|editor-last1 = Lawrence |editor-first1 = Mark A. |editor-last2 = Logevall |editor-first2 = Fredrik
|year=2007
|title=The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War
|publisher=Harvard University Press, Massachusetts
}},
}},
edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
Line 1,184: Line 1,423:


<ref name=Marr.2013>
<ref name=Marr.2013>
{{citation |last=Marr | first=David G. |year=2013 |title=Vietnam: State, War, and Revolution (1945-1946) |publisher=University of California Press, Berkeley.}}
{{citation  
|last=Marr  
|first=David G.  
|year=2013  
|title=Vietnam: State, War, and Revolution (1945-1946)  
|publisher=University of California Press, Berkeley.}}
</ref>
 
<ref name="McHale.2021">
{{citation
|last=McHale
|first=Shawn F.
|year=2021
|title=The First Vietnam War: Violence, Sovereignty, and the Fracture of the South, 1945-1956
|publisher=Cambridge University Press
}}.
</ref>
</ref>


Line 1,212: Line 1,466:
|first=Phillips P.
|first=Phillips P.
|title=Roosevelt, Yalta, and the Origins of the Cold War  
|title=Roosevelt, Yalta, and the Origins of the Cold War  
|url=https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/09/01/roosevelt-stalin-yalta-europe-division-soviet-world-war/
|journal=Foreign Policy  
|journal=Foreign Policy  
|date=2024-09-01
|date=2024-09-01
Line 1,253: Line 1,508:
}},
}},
edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.  
edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.  
</ref>
<ref name=Sainteny.1972>
{{citation
|last=Sainteny
|first=Jean
|year=1972
|title=Ho Chi Minh and his Vietnam
|publisher=Cowles Book Company, Inc., Chicago.  Translated from the 1970 French version ''Face à Ho Chi Minh'' by Herma Briffault.
}}
</ref>
</ref>



Latest revision as of 09:19, 3 December 2024

User:Loc_Vu-Quoc/sandbox

Nguyen Ngoc Bich

User:Loc_Vu-Quoc/Draft:Nguyen_Ngoc_Bich


By Loc Vu-Quoc (Archive.is 2024.10.27), Edit history ◉ Started at 08:10, 10 June 2023

To remain silent is to be complicit
Peut-être la vérité permettra-t-elle de retrouver le chemin de la paix. Pour qui a pu réunir les pièces du dossier, il n'est plus pos­sible de se taire sans éprouver, chaque jour davantage, le senti­ment d'être complice.

[Perhaps the truth will allow us to find the path to peace. For those who have been able to gather the pieces of history, it is no longer possible to remain silent without feeling, with every passing day, the feeling of being complicit.]

---Philippe Devillers (1952), Histoire du Viêt-Nam de 1940 à 1952, Seuil, Paris, Forewords.[1]:8


Introduction

Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Bich, 1962
Nguyễn Ngọc Bích
Born 18 May 1911
Bến Tre, Vietnam
Died 4 Dec 1966
Thủ Đức, Vietnam
Occupation *Engineer
  • Resistance fighter
  • Medical doctor
  • Politician
Title Doctor (medical)
Known for Resistance war, politics
Nguyen Ngoc Bich 1931, student at École polytechnique.
Nguyen Ngoc Bich, circa 1933, student at École polytechnique.

Nguyễn Ngọc Bích (1911–1966) is a hero of the Vietnamese resistance against the French colonists[2]:850. NOTE N.psq1 and revered as one of the most popular local heroes.[3]:122 The Nguyen-Ngoc-Bich street in the city of Cần Thơ, Vietnam, was named after him to honor and commemorate his feats (of sabotaging bridges to slow down the colonial French-army advances) and heroism (being on the French most-wanted list,[3]:122 imprisoned, subjected to an "intensive and unpleasant interrogation"[3]:122 that left a mark on his forehead,N.bi1 and exiled) during the First Indochina War.

A French-educated engineer and medical doctor, and an intellectual and politician, he proposed an alternative viewpoint to avoid the high-casualty, high-cost war between North Vietnam and South Vietnam.[4]

Upon graduating from the École polytechnique (engineering military school under the French Ministry of Armed Forces) and then from the École nationale des ponts et chaussées (civil engineering) in France in 1935,[5] Dr. Bich returned to Vietnam to work for the French colonial government. After World War II, in 1945, he joined the Viet-Minh,N.bvm and became a senior commander in the Vietnamese resistance movement, and insisted on fighting for Vietnam's independence, not for communism.

SuspectingN.bs of being betrayed by the Communist factionN.bs of the Viet-Minh and apprehended by the French forces, Bich was saved from execution by a campaign for amnesty by his École polytechnique classmates based in Vietnam, mostly high-level officers of the French army,[6]: 299 and was subsequently exiled to France, where he founded with friends and managed the Vietnamese publishing house Minh Tan (in Paris), which published many important works for the Vietnamese literature,N.mbl in particular, the Sino-Vietnamese Dictionary, a key reference for many generations of writers and students for a standardized Vietnamese writing. To reprint this dictionary, Bich wrote a moving open letter to the dictionary author Dao Duy Anh, who could not be located due to war time, to ask for permission.N.vqf

In parallel, Bich studied medicine and became a medical doctor. He was highly regarded in Vietnamese politics, and was suggested by the French in 1954 as an alternative to Ngo Dinh Diem as the sixth prime minister of the State of Vietnam under the former Emperor Bao Dai as Head of State,[7]:84 who selected Ngo Dinh Diem as prime minister. While Bich's candidature for the 1961 presidential election in opposition to Diem was, however, declared invalid by the Saigon authorities at the last moment for "technical reasons",[8][5], he was "regarded by many as a possible successor to President Ngo Dinh Diem".[8] N.pi, N.tcq

A large majority of the information in this article came from the master document Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography,[9] which contains even more information, including primary-source evidence and photos, than presented here. Most images in the present article were uploaded for the first time at the time of the writing by the original writer.N.vql

Important historical events that affected Bich's adult life, together with those mentioned in his 1962 paper (e.g., failed agrarian reform, napalm bombs, famine, conquest for rice, etc.) are summarized, in particular the atmosphere in which Bich had lived for ten years working for the French colonialists (from 1935 to 1945), and the historical conditions that drove this French-educated engineer to become a "Francophile anticolonialist"N.fa1, N.psq2 and to join the Viet-Minh in 1945N.bvm (e.g., the French brutal repressions in 1940 and 1945, the power vacuum after the Japanese coup de force in 1945, Ho Chi Minh's call for a general uprising from Tân Trào, the 1945 August Revolution, the Black Sunday on 1945 Sep 2 in Saigon, etc.). The key principle is to summarize a historical event only when it was directly related to Bich's activities. Care is exercised in selecting references and quotations that complement, but not duplicate, other Wikipedia articles at the time of this writing. For example, the history and the general use of napalm bombs, which Bich mentioned in his 1962 article, are not summarized. Regarding the French using American-made napalm bombs in the First Indochina War, well-known battlesN.nb are also not summarized.

First Indochina War

The broader historic events of World War II and the First Indochina War---specifically, the short interwar period between end of the former and the beginning of the later—led to the context in which Nguyen Ngoc Bich fought the French colonists until he was captured.

Ellen J. Hammer was the first American-born historianN.vt with a deep knowledge of the French colonial rule in Indochina in the early 1950s during the First Indochina War. Dr. Hammer's[10] N.ejh highly influential book titled The Struggle for Indochina[11] N.ehb ---published in 1954 well before the United States sent American troops to Vietnam in the 1960s---described the events, politics, and historic personalities leading to the First Indochina War. Her works were considered among the must-read books by respected historians on Vietnam history, as Osborne (1967)[12] wrote: "Indeed, any serious student of Viet-Nam will have either read Devillers,N.pd Lacouture,N.jls Fall, Hammer and Lancaster's[13] N.dlb studies already, or will be better served by reading them first hand." To give a historical context within which Bich fought the French colonists, there is no better English source to begin than Dr. Hammer's Vietnam-history book.

The American dilemma---(1) To help the French to re-establish its colony in Vietnam or (2) To help free the Vietnamese from the yoke of French colonialism---was described by Hammer as follows:

American dilemma: Help the French or help the Vietnamese
The United States has entangled itself in a war in a distant corner of Asia in which it resolutely does not want to participate and from which it equally resolutely cannot abstain. It has committed itself to the cause of France [ French Indochina ] and of Bao Dai, but enough of the old spirit of anticolonialism is left to make this a somewhat unsavory commitment: it cannot bring itself wholly to ignore the fact that the free world looks less than free to a people whose country is being fought over by a foreign army. Aware that a lasting peace can be built only on satisfaction of the national aspirations of the Indochinese, the United States must at the same time conciliate a France reluctant to abandon her colonial past.
---Ellen Hammer (1954), The struggle for Indochina, Preface p. xii.[11]:xii

The activities directly or indirectly affected Bich's life by four historic individuals are summarized. French General de Gaulle, by his desire to reconquer Indochina as a French colony, was a main force that led to the First Indochina War, in which Bich fought. Ho Chi Minh, founder and leader of the Viet-Minh, called for the general uprising---against the French colonists and the Japanese occupiers---to which Bich responded. US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ardent anticolonialism could have prevented the two Indochina wars, and changed the course of history. US President Harry Truman was a reason that the First Indochina War is now called the "French-American" War in Vietnamese literature,[14] and through his support for the French war effort supplied napalm bombs, which Bich mentioned in his 1962 paper. The US funded more than 30% of the war cost in 1952 under US President Eisenhouer, and "nearly 80%" in 1954 under Truman.N.fwc

Charles de Gaulle

Charles de Gaulle speaking on the BBC, 1941
De Gaulle's ambition to restore French rule over Indochina, 1944

De Gaulle was a prime mover leading to the First Indochina War in which the French-educated Bich fought on the Viet-Minh side against the French colonialists.

At the beginning of World War II, in his historic four-minute call-to-arms broadcast from London on 1940 June 18, later known as L'Appel du 18 Juin in French history, the mostly then unknownN.cdg1 General de Gaulle counted on the French Empire, with Indochina as the "Pearl of the Empire", rich in rubber, tin, coal, and rice,[15]:28 to provide resources to fight the Axis, with the support of the British Empire and the powerful industry of the United States. Understanding that Indochina was under the menace of occupation by the Japanese, de Gaulle harbored the dream of wresting this colony back into the fold of the French Empire, writing in his memoirs "As I saw her move away into the mist, I swore to myself that I would one day bring her back."[15]:25 N.dgd

On 1945 Mar 13, four days after the Japanese coup de force in Indochina (Mar 9), de Gaulle summoned US ambassador to France Jefferson Caffery[16] to complain that the French army fighting in Indochina requested help from the US military authorities in China---headed by US General Wedemeyer[17] [18]:66 who followed closely the instructions of US President Roosevelt[18]:67---but was told that "under instructions no aid could be sent."[16] De Gaulle then played the Cold-War card, telling Caffery that France would fall into the sphere of influence of the USSR if the US did not support France to retake Indochina:[19]:243

De Gaulle to Caffery, 1945 March
Do you [the US] want us [France] to become... one of the federated states under the Russian aegis? The Russians are advancing apace. . . When Germany falls they will be upon us. If the public here comes to realize that you are against us in Indochina there will be terrific disappointment and nobody knows to what that will lead. We do not want to become Communist; we do not want to fall into the Russian orbit; but I hope that you do not push us into it.
--- De Gaulle to Jefferson Caffery, US Ambassador to France, 1945 March[20]:289
US President Harry Truman and French General de Gaulle, White House, 1945 Aug 12.

"Within two weeks" of the death of US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt on 1945 Apr 12, de Gaulle pressured Harry Truman on the Indochina issue, and his government launched "an intensive propaganda effort to mold world opinion in favor of the status quo (French control) in Indochina",[21]:116 and this after having approved the Japanese occupation of Indochina since 1940 September 22.[21]:452 By the time General de GaulleN.cdg2 came to the US in 1945 Aug (inset photo) to campaign for US military aid from then US President Harry Truman, the "French had been forced to drown several Vietnamese uprisings in blood. They had seen the colonial economy completely disrupted. They had been humiliated by the Germans in Europe and incarcerated by the Japanese in Indochina. Even to begin to reassert sovereignty in Indochina, the French were forced to go hat in hand to the Americans (see inset photo, de Gaulle visited Truman), British, and Chinese."[22]:413

To restore French rule over Indochina, on 1945 Jun 7, as Chairman of the French Provisional Government (formed in 1944 Aug after the liberation of Paris), General de Gaulle appointed General Leclerc to establish and to command the French Expeditionary Corps.[23]:321-2 N.laa Even though Eisenhower headquarters recommended against Leclerc’s appointment in favor of General Carpentier,[24]:397 they did not follow up with this objection since the focus was on defeating Japan, but did inform the French that it would take several months to equip the French divisions.[23]:322 De Gaulle also appointed Admiral Thierry d’Argenlieu as High Commissioner of Indochina, the "French Rasputin"[21]:382 N.dar who later played a key role in sowing the seeds of the First Indochina War.

Emperor Bao Dai

On 1945 Aug 20, just ten days before he abdicated on 1945 Aug 30,N.bda Vietnam Emperor Bao Dai sent a moving plea to de Gaulle:N.bdq

Bao Dai to de Gaulle, 1945 Aug 20
I beg you to understand that the only means of safeguarding French interests and the spiritual influence of France in Indochina is to recognize the independence of Vietnam unreservedly and to renounce any idea of reestablishing French sovereignty or rule here in any form. . . . Even if you were to reestablish the French administration here, it would not be obeyed, and each village would be a nest of resistance. . . . We would be able to understand each other so easily and become friends if you would stop hoping to become our masters again.
--- Bao Dai, message to de Gaulle on 1945 Aug 20[25]:xiii–xiv
OSS Maj. Archimedes Patti in Kunming, 1945 May.

Just a few days later on 1945 Aug 26 (or very shortly thereafter), Ho Chi Minh put the resistance in much stronger terms to US OSS Major Archimedes Patti, who still remembered vividly after some 35 years:N.hcm1

Paul Mus (1902-1969)
Ho Chi Minh to Archimedes Patti, 1945 Aug 26
If the French intended to return to Viet Nam as imperialists to exploit, to maim and kill my people, [I] could assure them and the world that Viet Nam from north to south would be reduced to ashes, even if it meant the life of every man, woman, and child, and that [my] government's policy would be one of scorched earth to the end.
--- Ho Chi Minh to OSS Maj. Archimedes Patti[21]:4

The Southeast Asia and Buddhism expert Paul Mus, who first met Ho Chi Minh in 1945, recounted that Ho Chi Minh said[26] then:N.ytp1

Ho Chi Minh to Paul Mus, 1945
I have no army, no diplomacy, no finances, no industry, no public works. All I have is hatred, and I will not disarm it until I feel I can trust you [the French].
--- Ho Chi Minh, according to Paul Mus, the New York Times 1969 obituary[26]

Paul Mus added "For every time Ho Chi Minh has trusted us, we betrayed him."N.ytp2

War broke out on 1945 Sep 23,[15]:115 with Bich joining the Viet Minh, an organization founded by Ho Chi Minh, to fight the French.

Ho Chi Minh

Ho Chi Minh declaring Vietnam independence 1945 Sep 2.
Ho Chi Minh and Vo Nguyen Giap giving a farewell party to the US Army intelligence Deer Team (OSS),N.hos 1945.

For thirty years, from 1912 when Ho Chi Minh first visited Boston and New York City until about 1948-1949, Ho held out his hope that the US would provide military support for his anticolonialist resistance against the French.[15]:xxii Since that visit to the US in his early twenties, Ho---like Bich, a Francophile anticolonialist,N.fa2 N.psq3 who was both a communist and a nationalistN.hcn ---developed a "lifelong admiration for Americans".[7]:55 N.haa

Seizing on the opportunity of the Japanese entering Tonkin in 1940 September[21]:452 to begin occupy Indochina (with French agreement)[21]:452 to rid Vietnam of French colonial yoke,N.hir Ho (who was in Liuzhou, China) returned to the China-Vietnam border and began a "training program for cadres".[21]:452 Then on 1941 February 8,[21]:524 Ho crossed the border to enter Vietnam for the first time after 30 years away (from 1911 to 1941), and sheltered in cave Cốc Bó[27]:73 near the Pác Bó hamlet, in the Cao Bằng province, less than a mile from the Chinese border.[15]:34 N.dii There Ho convened a plenum in 1941 May, and founded the Viet-Minh, an anticolonialist organization that Bich joined in 1945.N.bvm

On 1941 Sep 8, two months after the total integration of Indochina into the Japanese military system, Ho (still known as Nguyen Ai Quoc at that time) in his call to arm to the people of Tonkin, announced the formation of the Viet-Minh to "fight the French and Japanese fascism until the total liberation of Vietnam."[1]:97 On 1941 Oct 25, the Viet-Minh published its first manifesto:

Viet Minh first manifesto, 1941 Oct 25
Unification of all social strata, of all revolutionary organizations, of all ethnic minorities. Alliance with all other oppressed peoples of Indochina. Collaboration with all French anti-fascist groups. One goal: the destruction of colonialism and imperialist fascism. N.vmm
Gen. Chang Fa-kwei (2nd from right), US Kwangsi Command Headquarters, 1945 Jun 7

In 1942 August, Ho (named "Nguyen Ai Quoc" at that time) crossed the border into China with the intention of attracting the interest of the Allies in Chungking[21]:7 (now Chongqing) for the Vietnamese resistance movement, arrested by the Chinese on 1942 August 28 for being "French spy",[21]:525 but the real reason was Ho's political activities, viewed as "Communistic", instead of "nationalistic", by the Chinese (Chiang Kai-shek) and the Allies at Chungking (now Chongqing).[1]:103 N.vnh Ho was detained for thirteen months, starting at the Tienpao prison,[21]:51 N.htp moving through eighteen different prisons,[15]:77 N.vnh2 and ending up at Liuchow[21]:46 (now Liuzhou), from where he was released on 1943 September 10, after changing his name from Nguyen Ai Quoc to Ho Chi Minh.[21]:453 At that time, the name "Nguyen Ai Quoc" was very popular, while hardly any one heard of the new name "Ho Chi Minh".N.naq

Maj. Gen. Claire Chennault on 1945 Jul 23, four months after he met Ho Chi Minh on 1945 Mar 29.

Ho Chi Minh returned to Vietnam in 1944 September, after obtaining the authorization from the Chinese authority, Gen. Chang Fa-Kwei (Zhang Fakui (German), Trương Phát Khuê (Vietnamese)) ---who was under "severe pressure from the Japanese Ichigo offensive" to obtain intelligence in Indochina---and after submitting the "Outline of the Plan for the Activities of Entering Vietnam".[23]:134 N.hvn All three protagonists---the French Vichy colonialists, the Japanese occupiers, and the Viet-Minh---were deceived by US war plan,N.uwp and expected a US invasion of Indochina.N.uii Such expectation was the main reason[23]:209 that, in 1945 February-March, during an "unusually cold month of February,"[21]:56 N.cf45 Ho once again crossed back into China, and walked from the Pác Bó hamlet to Kunming to meetN.wtk (and to "make friends with"[23]:210) American OSS and OWI (Office of War Information) officers to exchange intelligence.N.hmo [23]:238 Ho's report to the OSS mentioned the Japanese coup de force on the evening of 1945 March 9.[23]:238

In Kunming, Ho requested OSS Lt. Charles FennN.fhh to arrange for a meeting with Gen. Claire Chennault, commander of the Flying Tigers.[21]:58 In the meeting that occurred on 1945 Mar 29, Ho requested a portrait of Chennault, who signed across the bottom "Yours sincerely, Claire L. Chennault".[21]:58 Ho displayed the portrait of Chennault, along with those of Lenin and Mao, in his lodging at Tân Trào as "tangible evidence to convince skeptical Vietnamese nationalists that he had American support".[21]:58 As additional evidence, Ho also possessed six brand-new US Colt .45 pistols in original wrappings that he requested and got from Charles Fenn.[28]:79 [29]:158 This "seemingly insignificant quantity" of arms,N.hgp together with "Chennault's autographed photograph" as evidence, convinced other factions of the primacy of the Viet Minh. Ho's American-backing ruse worked.[21]:58

Souphanouvong, Ho Chi Minh, Vinh Thuy (Bao Dai), 1945 Sep 4

In Cochin China (the south),N.tcc where Bich lived and worked, Tran Van Giau (Trần Văn Giàu in Vietnamese), a Viet Minh leader and "Ho Chi Minh's trusted friend",[21]:186 on 1945 Aug 22 used Ho's ruse of "American backing for the Viet Minh", to convince other pro-Japanese nationalist groups (Phuc Quoc, Dai Viet, United National Front[21]:524) and religious sects (Cao Dai, Hoa Hao) that they would be outlawed by the invading Allies, and thus should accept the leadership of the Viet Minh, which had strong support of "the Allies with arms, equipment and training".[21]:186

Fearing a US invasion with the French colonialists helping, the Japanese initiated operation Bright Moon (Meigo sakusen), leading to a coup de force on 1945 March 9 to neutralize the French forces and to remove the French colonial administration in Indochina[18]:65 (and thus the status of Bich's job in the French colonial government).

Leclerc's convoy entered Hanoi on 1946 Mar 18, flying both French and Viet-Minh flags.

Two days later, on 1945 Mar 11, then Emperor Bao Dai abolished the "French-Annamite Treaty of Protectorate of 1884"[21]:73 that put Vietnam under French protectorate, and proclaimed Vietnam independence:N.vnh3

Bao Dai's proclamation of Vietnam independence, 1945 Mar 11
In view of the world situation, and that of Asia in particular, the Government of Viet-Nam publicly proclaims that from this day forward, the protectorate treaty with France is abolished and that the Country resumes its rights to independence.

Viet-Nam will strive using its own means to develop itself to deserve the condition of an independent State and will follow the directives of the Greater East Asia Manifesto, considering itself as a member of the Greater East Asia, to contribute its resources to the common prosperity. Therefore, the Government of Viet-Nam trusts in the loyalty of Japan and is determined to collaborate with this country to achieve the aforementioned goal.

--- Bao Dai, Hue, the 27th day of the 1st month of the 20th year Bao Dai (1945 Mar 11).[1]:125
Ho Chi Minh, Leclerc, Sainteny, 1946 Mar 18.

The resulting power vacuum[18]:64 following this coup de force changed the political situation, and provided a favorable setting for the Viet Minh takeover of the government.[18]:73 In 1945 April, Ho walked a perilous journey from Pác Bó to Tân Trào, the Viet Minh headquarters in the Liberated Area. There, on 1945 August 16, Ho called for a general uprising to throw out the Japanese occupiers that ultimately led to the August Revolution.N.pvar

Power vacuum yielded a bloodless revolution, 1945 Mar 9 - Aug 26
In August and September 1945, the white-bearded Ho Chi Minh emerged as the winner of the Indochina game. All along he had ex­pected Japan to be defeated, and he had consistently sought to tie his own movement to the United States and Nationalist China. In 1945 he was guilty of the same false assumptions as the Japanese. He expected an Allied invasion and prepared himself for assisting the invading forces. Instead he got a power vacuum and a sudden Japanese surren­der. This provided him with an occasion more favorable for bloodless revolution than he could ever have imagined. He then proclaimed the republic that would later defeat both France and the United States.
--- Tonnesson 2007, Franklin Roosevelt, Trusteeship and Indochina: A reassessment.[18]:73

Even though being a son of a Cao Dai pope,[30] [5] [31] N.cd Bich joined the Viet Minh in 1945,N.bjvm instead of the Cao Dai force.

Ho Chi Minh and d'Argenlieu on the French battleship Emile-Bertin, 1946 Mar 24.

Under the pressure of a "strong resolution calling for Bao Dai's abdication" by the "leftist students and faculty" in Hanoi around 1945 Aug 20[21]:185-6 and also by the Viet Minh,[21]:186 Bao Dai "voluntarily"[25]:12 abdicated to become the "Supreme Advisor"[1]:143 N.bda2 to the new government of Ho Chi Minh, who "did not thus declare but confirm Vietnam's independence in his famous address to the people in Ba Dinh square in Hanoi"[25]:12 on 1945 Sep 2.N.hvi

After the August Revolution in 1945, the French began to negotiate their return to Tonkin with both the Viet Minh and the Chinese army coming to disarm the defeated Japanese north of the 16th parallel. Ho Chi Minh was weary of the Chinese, who might stay in Vietnam permanently, signed the preliminary March 6 [1946] AccordsN.m6a1 N.m6a3 with Jean Sainteny, "commissioner of the French Republic in Tonkin and North Annam [central Vietnam],"[25]:9 to agree to let the French army under General Leclerc to enter Tonkin. On 1946 Mar 18, "General Leclerc led 1,200 troops and 220 vehicles,"[32]:90 bearing both French and Viet-Minh flags,[1]:238 N.leh "into Hanoi to the relief and delight of more than ten thousand French civil­ians who had gathered along Trang Tien Street to cheer and sing” the French national anthem.[32]:90 After his entry into Hanoi, "Leclerc quickly established cordial relations with Ho Chi Minh."[33]

Then High Commissioner d'Argenlieu, the "abomination of Vietnam,"N.dar2 insisted to meet Ho Chi Minh on the French battleship Emile-Bertin, "bristling with guns" to impress on Ho French military power, in the Ha Long Bay on 1946 Mar 24, together with Gen. Leclerc and Jean Sainteny for a follow-up discussion stipulated by the preliminary March 6 Accords.N.hsc The key issue was to find a venue for a conference leading to a permanent agreement. While d'Argenlieu wanted to have the conference in Dalat, Cochin China (south Vietnam), Ho together with Leclerc and Sainteny wanted to meet in Paris.

Ho Chi Minh observing a battlefield in 1950 Sep.

In May 1946, Ho Chi Minh boarded an airplane for France.N.hif The conference at Fontainebleau, outside of Paris, failed to reach an agreement. With "nearly insoluble fundamental differences of viewpoint,"[34]:84 the main disagreements centered around the unification of the three regions, called the "three Ky," namely Tonkin (north), Annam (central), Cochin China (south Vietnam), and the independence of Vietnam, to which France only wanted to give an "autonomy."[34]:84 On 1946 August 1, D'Argenlieu undercut the Fontaineblau negotiation by calling for a "federation" conference in Dalat, giving the autonomy status to Cochin China, thus preempted the possibility of Cochin China to join a unification of the "three Ky" via a referendum as agreed to in the March 6 Accords.[34]:84 Ho told Sainteny:

Ho Chi Minh to Jean Sainteny, 1946 September
Then if we must fight, we will fight. You will kill ten of my men while we will kill one of yours. But you will be the ones to end up exhausted. And in the long run, I will win!
--- Sainteny 1972, Ho Chi Minh and His Vietnam.[34]:66, 89

CBS reporter David Schoenbrun interviewed Ho Chi Minh on 1946 Sep 11, the same day that a telegram was dispatched from the High Commissioner d'Argenlieu to the French Indochina Committee on the arrest of Bich on 1946 Aug 25.:N.bb

CBS Schoenbrun interviewed Ho Chi Minh, 1946 Sep 11
President Ho, how can you possibly fight a war against the modern French army? You have nothing. You've just told me, what a poor country you are. You don't even have a bank, let alone an army, and guns, and modern weapons, the French planes, tanks, napalm. How can you fight the French?

And he [Ho] said: Oh we have a lot of things that can match the French weapons. Tanks are no good in swamps. And we have swamps in which the French tanks will sink. And we have another secret weapon, it's nationalism. And don't think that a small ragged band cannot fight against a modern army. It will be a war between an elephant and a tiger. If the tiger ever stands still the elephant will crush him and pierce him with his mighty tusks. But the tiger of Indochina is not going to stand still. We're going to hide in our jungles by day and steal out by night. And the tiger will jump on the back of the elephant and tear huge chunks out of his flesh and then jump back into the jungle. And after a while the mighty elephant will bleed to death.

--- CBS reporter David Schoenbrun, Youtube video French involvement in Vietnam & Dien Bien Phu - 1962, time 3:10.[35]

Bich wrote about the French use of American-made napalm bombs; see Section Napalm bombs.

I AM HERE 24.11.30.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

If Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) had lived beyond 1945 Apr 12, when he died, he "would have tried to keep France from forcibly reclaiming control of Indochina, and might well have succeeded, thereby changing the flow of history,"[15]:710 meaning the First Indochina War with more than half a million deaths,N.fwc and the Second Indochina War with more than three million deaths,N.awc would be avoided; then Bich would not join the Viet Minh to fight the French colonialists.

FDR blamed European empires for wars: "European colonialism had helped bring on both the First World War and the current one, he was convinced, and the continued existence of empires would in all likelihood result in future conflagrations."[15]:46 "What is more, like Wilson, he [FDR] emerged from World War I convinced that the scramble for empire not only had set the European powers against one another and created the conditions that led to war, but also worked against securing a negotiated settlement during the fighting."[15]:47

In WWII, FDR believed that "France had ceased to exist," despite having the strongest army in Europe, [15]:27 and thought that European countries (France and Germany) could not live together peacefully: Both FDR and his Secretary of State Cordell Hull "believed that Franco-German disputes lay at the root of much of Europe's inability to maintain the peace".[15]:44

Roosevelt and Churchill, The Atlantic Charter conference, 1941

Moreover, de Gaulle's Indochina cause was hampered as FDR disliked de Gaulle's pomposity, egotism, and "his serene confidence that he represented the destiny of the French people."[15]:44 "In social interaction, de Gaulle was as austere and pompous as FDR was relaxed and jovial."[15]:44 That both de Gaulle and the Vichy government wanted to preserve the French Empire further “enhanced Roosevelt’s disdain" for de Gaulle.[15]:46 Cordell Hull was convinced that "de Gaulle was a fascist and an enemy of the United States."[15]:45

By the time of Pearl Harbor, FDR had become a "committed anticolonialist,"[15]:46 who wanted "complete independence for all or almost all European colonies",[15]:74 as evidenced by his speech in March 1941:

There has never been, there isn't now, and there never will be, any race of people on earth fit to serve as masters over their fellow men.… We believe that any nationality, no matter how small, has the inherent right to its own nationhood.
---Franklin D. Roosevelt, address to White House Correspondents' Association, March 1941.[15]:72

"Roosevelt went out of his way to single out France in Indochina and often cited French rule there as a flagrant example of onerous and exploitative colonialism."[21]:51

Roosevelt's anti-colonialist speech was subsequently encoded in the third point of The Atlantic Charter,N.cac which Churchill was reluctant to agree to, worrying that it would affect the British colonies:N.chac

The Atlantic Charter, 1941
Third, theyN.tac respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they wish to see sovereign rights and self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them;
---Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, The Atlantic Charter, August 14, 1941.[36]
US ambassador Hurley, Generalissimo Chiang Kai-Shek, Gen. Claire Chennault, Gen. Albert Wedemeyer, 1945

The Atlantic Charter inspired Third-World countries from Algeria to Vietnam in their fight for independence,[36] as Ho Chi Minh often referred to The Atlantic Charter in his letters to US government officials: “the carrying out of the Atlantic and San Francisco Charters implies the eradication of imperialism and all forms of colonial oppression,” wrote Ho Chi Minh to US Secretary of State James F. Byrnes in the Harry S. Truman administration on 1945 Oct 22.[37]:2 N.hac

One of Roosevelt's great war aims was to liberate the Indochinese, whom he dismissed as "a people of small stature," from the French colonialism.[23]:1

FDR envisioned a new world order in which the "four policemen," i.e., the US, the USSR, Great Britain and China, would maintain peace in the world. He discussed this concept with Stalin in Tehran in 1943.[18]:60 But failing to build up China as a great power, FDR encountered difficulties with his vision for Indochina.[18]:60

Yet, despite the "accepted wisdom" of historians prior to 2007 that (1) "Roosevelt abandoned or watered down his Indochina policy before he died," and (2) "the Truman administration built upon Roosevelt’s policy revision by endorsing the French return to Indochina," a 2007 argument was presented that "Roosevelt, though he was under pressure to abandon his policy, did not yield before he died."[18]:60

FDR on 1945 Apr 11,N.brd the day before he died.N.frd

Even though US intelligence (through "intercepted Japanese diplomatic messages"[18]:65) knew about the Japanese's concern of a US invasion and their plan to topple the French colonial government in Indochina since as early as 1945 Feb 11, none of this information was passed on to de Gaulle.[18]:65 On 1945 Mar 8, the day before the Japanese coup de force, Roosevelt ordered Lt Gen. Albert C. Wedemeyer---US commander of the China Theater, which included "mainland China, Manchuria, and Indochina, plus all the offshore islands, except Taiwan," and who began his assignment at the end of 1944 Oct[21]:14 --- "not to hand over supplies---any supplies at all---to French forces operating in Asia."[18]:66

"By fuelling French and Japanese expectations of a US invasion, Roosevelt, Wedemeyer and the OSS prompted a Franco-Japanese confrontation [i.e., the Japanese coup de force on 1945 March 9], which in turn paved the way for revolution,"[23]:220 i.e., the August Revolution in 1945, the year Bich joined the Viet Minh to fight the French.

On 1945 Mar 23, FDR "wanted to know what Wedemeyer could do to arm local resistance groups opposed to French rule."[18]:67 Wedemeyer wrote in a cable in 1945 May: "When talking to the President on my last visit he ex­plained the United States policy for FIC [French Indochina] and told me that I must watch carefully to prevent British and French political activities in the area and that I should give only such support to the British and French as would be required in direct operations against the Japanese."[18]:67 Wedemeyer "continued to carry out Roosevelt’s directives on Indochina well after the President’s death,"[23]:18 and squabbled with Lord Mountbatten, head of South-East Asia Command (SEAC), over "which commander held responsibility for military operations in Indochina."[15]:88

Mountbatten, the Supremo, asked Gen. Leclerc, who left Paris on 1945 Aug 17 on his way to reconquer Indochina under the order of de Gaulle, to first come to Kandy, Sri Lanka, SEAC headquarters.[1]:152 When Leclerc arrived on 1945 Aug 22, Mountbatten told him, "If Roosevelt had lived, you would not go to Indochina."[1]:153 N.mtl

Harry S. Truman

Harry S. Truman, circa 1945

Truman reversed Roosevelt’s commitment to free Indochina of French colonialism, allowing the French to reconquer Cochin-china with the help of the British, leading to The First Indochina War, with Bich fighting the French.

Roosevelt had selected Truman as his Vice President because Truman was more moderate than the previous left-leaning VP Henry Wallace.[38] But Roosevelt kept Truman in the dark about foreign policies,N.tfp met Truman only six times, and only one time alone without aides. Truman did not have experience in international relations, and was kept so, particularly about the important Yalta Conference in 1945 February, where Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin discussed the new world order.[38]

Potsdam Truman Churchill Stalin 1945 Jul 17

After the secretive FDR (who "never wrote down, and rarely discussed, a concrete vision for the postwar world"[38]) died, "U.S. policy fell into the hands of Truman, who had no idea what Roosevelt had really wanted to achieve or how he had planned to achieve it. Over the coming three years, Truman would take this ignorance, combined with Stalin’s strategic overreach and blundering, and create the Cold War that Roosevelt had always been keen to avoid."[38]

To maintain the appearance of continuing Roosevelt’s policy regarding Indochina, as Truman "did not want to convey the impression that his [Indochina] pol­icy was at odds with Roosevelt’s,"[18]:70 it took Truman close to two months, from the death of Roosevelt on 1945 Apr 12, until 1945 Jun 7 (the date of the telegram from Acting Secretary of State Joseph Grew, on behalf of Truman, to US Ambassador Patrick Hurley),[18]:72 N.uah to provide American officials in the Far East (US Ambassador Patrick Hurley and Gen Wedemeyer, US commander of China Theater) with "less than clear" policy regarding Indochina, "portraying change as continuity" of Roosevelt's policy of not letting the French reconquer Indochina as a colony.[18]:71

Potsdam Stalin Truman Gromyko Byrnes Molotov 1945 Jul 18

Truman's ("less than clear") US policy is described by Grew as follows: "It is the President's intention at some appropriate time to ask that the French Government give some positive indication of its in­tentions in regard to the establishment of civil liberties and increasing measures of self-government in Indo-China before formulating further declarations of policy in this respect."[18]:71

Under the threat of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, Truman did not want to “have a conflict with France and Britain”[18]:70 over the insistence of these countries to reconquer their lost colonies, effectively abandoning Roosevelt’s trusteeship plan for Indochina. Hurley and Wedemeyer "continued to operate in the shadow of FDR."[18]:70

US Gen. Albert C. Wedemeyer, China, 1945

As a result, "lacking clear directives from Truman, US military and intelligence agencies remained uncertain of their government's Indochina policy. Some of them therefore continued to apply Roosevelt's anti-French policy."[23]:19 French official Jean Sainteny lamented that he was "face to face with a deliberate Allied maneuver to evict the French from Indochina and that at the present time the Allied attitude is more harmful than that of the Viet-Minh."[39]:68-69 N.bq2

General Wedemeyer's orders not to aid the French came directly from the War Department. Apparently it was American policy then that French Indochina would not be returned to the French. The American government was interested in seeing the French forcibly ejected from Indochina so the problem of postwar separation from their colony would be easier. . . . While American transports in China avoided Indochina, the British flew aerial supply missions for the French all the way from Calcutta, dropping tommy guns, grenades and mortars.
---Bernard B. Fall (1966), The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis, p.57.[39]:57

Three months after Roosevelt's death, at the Potsdam Conference in 1945 July, the US adopted a neutral stance regarding the French return to Indochina: "The United States would not obstruct the restoration of French sovereignty, but neither would it give active backing,"[40]:112 contrary to what the British had hoped for, which was "active American support of French aims" of reconquering Indochina.[40]:111 Still, the partition of Indochina, with the Chinese in the north of the 16th parallel, and the British in the south, represented a "significant British victory," since London now had "an opportunity to reinstall a French military and administrative presence below the sixteenth parallel, a foothold that France could presumably exploit to recover the rest of the country from Chinese control."[40]:112

The Deer Team and the Viet Minh, the "Vietnam-America troops,"N.vat 1945 Aug 16, on their way to attack a Japanese garrison at Thai Nguyen before reaching Hanoi.

On the other hand, if the US had let the British control the whole of Indochina, the French would "most likely have been able to oust Ho Chi Minh's revolutionary government from Hanoi in the fall of 1945, thus immediately provoking general warfare."[25]:23 It was "the presence of a large Chinese army that allowed the Viet Minh to establish itself as the leading force in the new republic, with a legitimate claim to representing the southern part of the nation as well,"[25]:23 where Bich had joined the Viet Minh to fight the French.


War began

Two camps of historians chose two different dates for the start of the First Indochina War: Either 1945 Sep 23 (one year before the failed Fontainebleau conference in 1946 Sep), or more than a year later, 1946 Dec 19 (three months after the failed Fontainebleau conference in 1946 Sep). Of these two dates, 1945 Sep 23 is more relevant to Bich since he had been captured on 1946 Aug 25,[9] before 1946 Dec 19.

1945 Sep 23, Cochin China

The First Indochina War started on 1945 September 23 in Cochin China (south Vietnam) with the brutal repression of the Vietnamese by some 1,400 French soldiers, who had been imprisoned by the Japanese, then freed and re-armed by British General Gracey, and who went on a rampage, beating, lynching any Vietnamese they saw on the street.[15]:115

French war correspondent Germaine Krull, who arrived in Saigon on 1945 Sep 12 with the British Gurkhas soldiers and a small group of French soldiers,N.bfa was likely the first to mark the start of the First Indochina War on this date, as she described in her "most graphic, vivid, and absorbing" reportN.mok what she had witnessed "with her own eyes":

It is impossible to describe this day, which marked the beginning of the war in Indo-China. I saw everything with my own eyes - Annamites [Vietnamese] tied up, some of them tortured, drunken officers and soldiers with smoking guns. On the Rue Catinat, I saw soldiers driving before them a group of Annamites bound, slave-fashion, to a long rope. Women spat in their faces. They were on the verge of being lynched.

In more distant sections I saw French soldiers come out of Annamite houses with stolen shoes and shirts… From time to time, an Annamite dwelling would burst into flame. Women and children were fleeing. That night, French soldiers strolled on the Rue Catinat, a gun on one arm, a woman on the other. I have never been so deeply ashamed as on that day of September 23rd. When I returned to the hotel, the faces of the English were expressionless and conversations stopped as I went by. I remember the horror and shame I had felt in June of 1940 when Vichy was established, but never in my life had I felt such utter sadness and degradation as on this night.

That night I realized only too well what a serious mistake we had made and how grave the consequences would be. It was the beginning of a ruthless war. Instead of regaining our prestige we had lost it forever, and worse still, we had lost the trust of the few remaining Annamites who believed in us. We had showed them that the new France was even more to be feared than the old one.

---Germaine Krull (1945), Diary of Saigon, following the Allied occupation in September 1945.[41]:19
"Are you going to fight to kick out the French, or are you going to be a French puppet?"
French colonists tied up a Vietnamese, choked him, pulled his hair, and threw him onto a military truck
In the 1968 Documentary In the Year of the Pig, time 14:38, David Halberstam said: "... the Indochina war and all the best and most talented Vietnamese of a generation had faced, in 1946 and 1947, the alternative of the French or the Viet Minh. The best of a generation, the kind of young men who would join up the day after Pearl Harbor in this country [United States]. Are you going to fight to kick out the French, or are you going to be a French puppet? So the most talented people of a generation all signed up and the Viet Minh won this war and it was an enormously popular national war."

This date, 1945 Sep 23, "would go down in history: Trần Văn Giàu, a key communist leader of the southern Viet Minh, announced that "the war of Resistance has begun!" Vietnam's armed struggle against the French had started. It would last nine more years."[42]:45 Giau issued the following call for armed struggle to throw out the French, addressing to his Vietnamese compatriots, including those who were working for the French colons like Bich:

Compatriots of the South!

People of Saigon! Workers, farmers, youth, self-defense, militia, soldiers!

Last night, the French colonialists occupied our government headquarters in the center of Saigon. Thus, France began to invade our country once again.

Demonstration with banner "Vietnam Independent, Independence or Death," 1945 August.

On September 2,N.vid our compatriots swore to sacrifice their last drop of blood to protect the independence of the Fatherland:

"Independence or death!"

Today, the Resistance Committee calls on: All compatriots, old, young, men, and women, take up arms and rush to fight off the invaders. Anyone who does not have a duty assigned by the Resistance Committee must immediately leave the city. Those who remain must:

– Not work, not serve as soldiers for the French.
– Not show the way, not inform the French.
– Not sell food to the French.
– Find the French colonialists and destroy them.
– Burn all French offices, vehicles, ships, warehouses, and factories.

Saigon occupied by the French must become a Saigon without electricity, without water, without markets, without shops.

Fellow countrymen! From this moment on, our top priority is to destroy the French invaders and their henchmen. Fellow soldiers, militiamen, and self-defense members! Hold your weapons firmly in your hands, charge forward to drive out the French colonialists, and save the country.

The resistance war has begun!

Morning of September 23, 1945
Chairman of the Southern Resistance Committee
TRAN VAN GIAU

---Trần Văn Giàu 2011, HỒI KÝ TRẦN VĂN GIÀU (XVII) [Memoirs of Tran Van Giau, Vol.17], diendan.org. Internet Archive 2023.03.27

"Thus began, it could be argued, the Vietnamese war of liberation against France. It would take several more months before the struggle would extend to the entire south, and more than a year before it also engulfed Hanoi and the north, which is why historians typically date the start of the war as late 1946 [Dec 19].[25]:xii But this date, September 23, 1945, may be as plausible a start date as any."[15]:115

I AM HERE 24.11.21. Text commented out in this section to debug references listed, but not cited.


☛ NOT DONE, TO ADD: Egm4313.s12 (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

  • Brutal repression by British and French forces in Cochinchina (South Vietnam)
  • Quotations from Tønnesson (2010)Template:Sfn and Donaldson (1996)Template:Sfn

1946 Dec 19, Tonkin

Resistance

Cai Rang bridge, Can Tho, 2024. Nguyen Ngoc Bich sabotaged this bridge during the First Indochina War.

After graduating in 1935 from the École nationale des ponts et chaussées, a civil engineering school, Nguyen Ngoc Bich returned home to work as a civil engineer for the colonial government at the Soc-Trang Irrigation Department until the Japanese coup d'état in Viet Nam (1945 Sep 03). Bich then joined the Resistance in the Soc-Trang base area and was appointed Deputy Commander of the Military Zone 9 (vi), established on 1945 Dec 10, and included the provinces of Cần Thơ, Sóc Trăng, Rạch Giá, together with six other provinces. Bich sabotaged many bridges that were notoriously difficult to destroy such as Cai-Rang Bridge in Can Tho --- where a street was named to honor his feats[43] N.nnbs --- Nhu-Gia Bridge in Soc Trang, etc., blocking the advance of French forces directed by General Valluy and General Nyo, who were under the general command of General Philippe Leclerc, commander of the French Far East Expeditionary Corps (Corps expéditionnaire français en Extrême-Orient, CEFEO). Between 1946 March 6, when the March 6 Accords were signed,N.m6a3 and 1946 December 19, when most historians used as the date that started the First Indochina War, in Cochinchina, the military situation did not favor the Vietnamese.

Outside Saigon the various nationalist resistance groups, weakened though they were by the months of warfare with the British and French, still controlled large sections of the Cochin Chinese countryside. Ho Chi Minh proposed to General Leclerc the sending of mixed Franco-Vietnamese commissions to establish peace in Cochin China after the signing of the March 6 accord, but the General saw no reason for this in what was supposed to be French territory. When Ho sent his own emissaries to the south, they were arrested by the French who continued to regard Cochin China as a French colony, claiming a free hand there until the referendum could be held. This led to difficult local problems, as in the case of the Vietnamese emissary sent by one Vietnamese zone commander [Nguyen Ngoc Bich] to discuss a cease-fire with the local French commanding officer. The emissary was unceremoniously informed that the French expected complete capitulation—the surrender of arms and prisoners—and that this was an ultimatum. They had until the 31st of March to comply; if they failed to do so, the fighting would begin again. Before the Vietnamese left French headquarters, the French officer took his name and it was soon public knowledge that the French had put a price on his head as well as on that of his commander, Nguyen Ngoc Bich. In this particular region of Cochin China fighting resumed by the end of the month.
---Ellen Hammer (1954), The struggle for Indochina, pp. 157–158.[11]

Chester L. Cooper was an American diplomat and a key negotiator in many critical agreements in the 1950s and '60s, beginning with his involvement in the Geneva Conference on Indochina in 1954.[44] In his 2005 memoir In the Shadows of History: 50 Years Behind the Scenes of Cold War Diplomacy, "he recounted his association with a constellation of historic figures that included John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Nikita S. Khrushchev and Ho Chi Minh".[44] N.clc Dr. Cooper N.dcc --- who acquired a deep knowledge of Vietnam history from his years in Asia, from 1941 to 1954, first working for the Office of Strategic ServicesN.hos in China, then for the CIA in 1947, and subsequently became head of the Far East staff of the Office of National Estimates in 1950[45]---devoted some three to four pages to describe Dr. Bich in his Vietnam-history book The Lost Crusade: America in Vietnam, in particular some aspects of Bich's resistance activities:

A Viet-Minh suspect captured by a French-Foreign-Legion patrol in 1954.
As commander of the Viet Minh forces in the Delta during the late 40s, Bich became one of the most popular local heroes. During 1946 the Viet Minh hierarchy became concerned that Bich might pose a threat to the aims of the Viet Minh in the southern part of Vietnam, and by the end of that year Ho apparently decided that Bich had served his purpose in the Delta. He was "invited" to move North to become a member of the Viet Minh political and military headquarters in Hanoi. Bich was reluctant to leave his command, not only because of his desire to continue the fight against the French, but also because he felt uneasy about leaving his base of power. Nonetheless, he made his way north via the nationalist underground to Hanoi.

A day or two before Bich was to report to the Viet Minh headquarters, the French discovered his hiding place near Hanoi. Since he was on the French "most wanted" list, he was subjected to an intensive and unpleasant interrogation.

---Chester L. Cooper (1970), The Lost Crusade: America in Vietnam, p. 122.[3]
Vietnamese refugees boarding the US Navy ship LST 516 during Operation Passage to Freedom, October 1954. The cloth banner hung above the ship number 516 reads: "Your Passage to Freedom" with a Vietnamese translation below.

Joseph A. Buttinger was an ardent advocate for refugees of persecution, and a "renowned authority on Vietnam and the American war" in that country.[46] In 1940, he helped founded the International Rescue Committee, "a nonprofit organization aiding refugees of political, religious and racial persecution", and while "working with refugees in Vietnam in the 1950s, he became immersed in the history, culture, and politics of that nation".[46] His scholarship was in high demand during the Vietnam War. The New York Times described his his two-volume Vietnam-history book, Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled,[47][2] N.jbr1 as "a monumental work" that "marks a strategic breakthrough in the serious study of Vietnamese politics in America" and as "the most thorough, informative and, over all, the most impressive book on Vietnam yet published in America".[46] Joseph Buttinger wrote in Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol. 2 that Dr. Bich was "the resistance hero" whom "Diem had no success" to convince to join his cabinet:

Diem left Paris for Saigon on June 24, accompanied by his brother Luyen, by Tran Chanh Thanh, and by Nguyen Van Thoai, a relative of the Ngo family and the only prominent exile willing to join Diem's Cabinet. With others, such as the resistance hero Nguyen Ngoc Bich, Diem had no success. He tried unsuccessfully to win Nguyen Manh Ha, a Catholic who had been Ho Chi Minh's first Minister of Economics but who had parted with the Vietminh in December, 1946. These men, and others too, rejected Diem's concept of government, which clearly aimed at a one-man rule. Nor did they share Diem's illusions about the chances of preventing a Geneva settlement favorable to the Vietminh. Diem apparently believed that the National Army, no longer fighting under the French but for an independent government, would quickly become effective and reduce the gains made by the Vietminh.
---Joseph Buttinger (1967), Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol.2, p. 850.N.jbr2

That Nguyen Ngoc Bich was being hunted by the French colonists was described in Joseph Buttinger's book:[47]:641

[Note] 9. Miss Hammer cites the case of an emissary sent by Nguyen Ngoc Bich. The French took down his name when he came to their headquarters to negotiate a cease-fire, and "it was soon public knowledge that the French had put a price on his head as well as on that of his commander, Nguyen Ngoc Bich" (ibid., p. 158).
---Joseph Buttinger (1967), Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol.1, p. 641.N.pbh

Napalm bombs

On the French use of American-made napalm bombs, Bich wrote that the Viet Minh stopped following the advice of Chinese tacticians in launching large-scale mass attacks once many of their soldiers died by French napalm bombs. They switched from the costlier manufacturing of arms to the less expensive manufacturing of hand grenades, which can be used against light battalions to seize their arms.[4]

Publications

Bich's 1962 paper, summary

In 1962, Dr. Bich laid out an argument to avoid the subversion war by North Vietnam to conquer rice from South Vietnam to solve its famine problem due to low yields in agricultural production using archaic methods and due to the failed agrarian reform. His main points were (1) South Vietnam should have a truly liberal democratic government, (2) the South should establish commercial relations with the North to help solve the said famine problem, (3) the South should maintain a non-aligned neutrality that would prevent interference from the North, (4) the South would peacefully negotiate with the North toward a progressive reunification. Below is a more detailed summary of his article, looking back from more than 60 years later. As a result, past tense is used in this summary to describe long-past events, instead of the sometimes present tense used in the original article. The full article translated into French is available in the document Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.N.bb2

Vietnam, China, and USSR

Contrary to the belief of the Western world (that the Vietnamese generally disliked, and had an inferiority complex against, the Chinese), the Vietnamese tended to be too proud of their history and victories against the Chinese and Mongol invaders over the centuries.

Aware of the Chinese historical "fierce expansionism", an important question for North and South Vietnam was how to safeguard the future of Vietnam as a whole country.

While South Vietnam tried to forcibly assimilate Chinese immigrants and their descendants, North Vietnam adopted a "more subtle attitude", moving from "fears" during the Chiang Kai-shek era to "solidarity and friendship" after the communist had won in 1949.

The Geneva agreements, while satisfying for China, left the North Vietnamese to be content with the prospect of reunifying with South Vietnam upon an election. After the failure of the agrarian reform, there was a concern of the presence of many Chinese soldiers and civilians in North Vietnam. To keep Chinese economic aid flowing, Ho Chi Minh initially maintained a balance between Peking (Beijing) and Moscow, but subsequently tilted toward Moscow after Peking admitted that it could not help carry out a semi-heavy industrialization. In September 1960, Le Duan, then Secretary-General of the Party, put forward a three-point program: (1) Support Moscow in any Sino-Soviet dispute, (2) Five-year plan (1961–1965) to socialize North Vietnam, (3) Progressive and peaceful reunification of the two Vietnams.

Le Duan: Reconquer the South

With the nomination of Le Duan—who led the struggle for independence in South Vietnam for a long time and knew the South more than anyone else—as First Secretary of the Party, North Vietnam began to undertake the reconquest of the South, with the first step being to eliminate the Ngo Dinh Diem regime and the American influence in the South. There were deeper motives.

Communist pragmatism

"The most striking feature of the Vietnamese Communist leadership was its outstanding spirit of realism, even pragmatism." They continuously and critically reexamined facts so that a lesson could be drawn for every action and every happening to avoid past mistakes. By doing so, they tended to imitate or to repeat past actions that were proven successful, and lacked imagination and open-mindedness to create new solutions to tackle new challenges.

For example, they stopped following the advice of Chinese tacticians in launching large-scale mass attacks once many of their soldiers died by French napalm bombs. They switched from the costlier manufacturing of arms to the less expensive manufacturing of hand grenades, which can be used against light battalions to seize their arms. They bred dogs, instead of pigs, as a source of meat since dogs produced two litters of young each year, while pigs produced only one.

Rapid industrialization

A deeper motive to swing closer to Moscow was to develop a rapid industrialization to raise the standard of living to avoid complaints about dictatorship and restriction of freedom, and also the "dreaded spectre of becoming a mere satellite state".

The targets of the Five-Year Plan were "extremely optimistic". In the old French Indochina, "great leaps forward" in economics were achieved in some sectors, such as a 400% increase in plantation area, 150% increase in the number of workers in industrial establishments, in spite of World War I. Now, there was an abundance of labor due to high unemployment. The planned industrial projects could be completed if foreign aid maintained the same rhythm and agricultural production was adequate.

Agricultural risk of failure

It was doubtful, however, that the target of growing agricultural production by 61% over five years could be achieved due to low yields resulting from the archaic methods of cultivation, the old system of sub-letting land, the difficulty of cultivating new land, the discontent among the peasants, and the disastrous agrarian reforms and its consequence. Hunger had become endemic, and China could not come to the rescue because of her own problems. Rice had to be smuggled from the South to the North.

The five-year plan ran a "grave risk of failure" due to lack of food to feed the people in North Vietnam, without an increase in rice supply from South Vietnam, not to mention other unpredictable factors such as floods, droughts, bad weather, etc.

The success of the Five-Year Plan would be a primary condition to maintain some independence from Peking, which would exert a greater influence than from Moscow in the case of "necessary and inevitable war", and the North being a satellite of China "would constitute a most serious menace for the South, particularly in time of any major crisis".

Famine, conquest of rice

The great Vietnamese famine 1944–1945.

The reconquest of the South entrusted to Le Duan could then be understood as "a struggle unleashed simply for the purpose of conquering rice", without which the five-year plan most certainly would fail. For many Southerners, their reaction against the Diem regime, rather than the love for Communism, enabled this subversion war to continue. The enormous economic benefit that North Vietnam would harvest from the national reunification was the primary reason for the war.

North Vietnam was fighting to secure rice, and thus the war was, from the purely national point of view, a legitimate one. Ngo Dinh Diem on the other hand refused to provide aid to alleviate the famine in the North.

North-South relation

The Vietnamese people had for a long time a desire to have a liberal, truly democratic government. and had proven that in the end they would rise time and again to thwart the yoke imposed on them by any foreign power.

To avoid such internal war for rice from becoming a proxy war for Moscow, there should be a liberal regime in Saigon that allowed for establishing commercial relations with Hanoi and for a call to stop the fighting. Moreover, a non-aligned political neutrality would prevent interference by North Vietnam in the affairs of South Vietnam.

Reunification negotiation

A peaceful and progressive reunification of the two Vietnams could only be achieved through negotiation at a table, and not by arm struggle in the jungle. The South would hope to live side by side peacefully with the North to collaborate in building the common Vietnamese nation, as the alternative would make "reunification" a propaganda that concealed the desire to conquer.

Notes

(↑ NOTE) How to create the Note jump-to and jump-back links: The Note link-labels, such as N.bda in superscript, are unique identifiers for the corresponding Notes, with "N" standing for "Note", followed by a period and three or four characters summarizing the Note contents, e.g., "bda" for "Bao Dai abdication," which is the title (in italics) of the Note (jump-to) link N.bda. In front of each Note, the uparrow ↑ preceeding a Note (jump-back) link such as (↑ N.bda) indicates the link to jump back UP to the main text where the jump-to link N.bda appears.

The target of the jump-back link (↑ N.bda) is the HTML anchor with the code <span id="Bao Dai abdication jump"></span> having the anchor name being "Bao Dai abdication jump", without an Anchor_text (or link text, or link label) inside. The code [[#Bao Dai abdication jump|N.bda]] creates the jump-back link (see Help:Link) with label "N.bda" to jump back UP to the main text where the anchor with anchor name "Bao Dai abdication jump" was embedded.

  • (↑ N.atr) Alliance transposition: A surprising alliance transposition happened, with rightist resistance fighters turned to the Japanese (just like the French turned to the British), whereas the leftist resistance fighters turned to China and America (just like the French turned to the USSR) ["On pent ainsi, et bien que de tels rapprochements soient très arbitraires, exprimer en termes européens la situation indochinoise : contre l'impérialisme présent (qui est ici la France), les « résistants » de droite (Caodaistes, Hoa Hao, Phuc Quoc, etc.) regardent vers le Japon (comme les nôtres vers les Anglo-Saxons), tandis que les « résistants » de gauche se tournent vers la Chine et l'Amérique, comme les nôtres le faisaient vers l'U.R.S.S. La transposition étonne, mais elle est, à notre avis, exacte."][1]:99

  • (↑ N.awc) American War casualties: The Second Indochina War or the Vietnam War, known as the "American War" in Vietnamese literature, led to a "staggering number of deaths, especially among Vietnamese (between three and four million Vietnamese lost their lives), and the utter destruction of much of the country of Vietnam and large portions of Laos and Cambodia."[49]:85 "In 1995 Vietnam released its official estimate of the number of people killed during the Vietnam War: as many as 2,000,000 civilians on both sides and some 1,100,000 North Vietnamese and Viet Cong fighters. The U.S. military has estimated that between 200,000 and 250,000 South Vietnamese soldiers died. The Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C., lists more than 58,300 names of members of the U.S. armed forces who were killed or went missing in action. Among other countries that fought for South Vietnam, South Korea had more than 4,000 dead, Thailand about 350, Australia more than 500, and New Zealand some three dozen."[50]

  • (↑ N.p4a) Atlantic Charter, Point 4: "Fourth; they will endeavor, with due respect to their existing obligations, to further the enjoyment by all states, great or small, victor or vanquished, of access on equal terms, to the trade and to the raw materials of the world which are needed for their economic prosperity;"N.cac2

  • (↑ N.bdq) Bao Dai quote: In the foreword by Devillers for Tønnesson's 2010 book Vietnam 1946.[25]:xiii-xiv

  • (↑ N.brd) Before FDR died: Churchill had been resisting to bother FDR regarding Indochina, but relented under the urge of the British Foreign Office, and dispatched on 1945 Apr 11, the day before FDR died, a "strongly worded telegram," stating "It would look very bad in history if we failed to support isolated French forces in their resis­tance to the Japanese to the best of our ability, or, if we excluded the French from participation in our councils as regards Indo-China."[18]:67-68

  • (↑ N.bs) Betrayal suspicion: On the betrayal suspicion, Chester Cooper wrote in 1970:[3]:123 "Whether the Viet Minh had actually betrayed him to French agents is not known for certain, but Bich always suspected that this was how he had been discovered," whereas the assertion that Bich "was betrayed by his Communist colleagues to the French" was written in the short biography that accompanied Bich's 1962 article, in Honey, P.J., ed. (March 1962), "Special Issue on Vietnam", The China Quarterly 9. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2023. Volume 9. See the Note on The China Quarterly.

  • (↑ N.bb) Bich biography: See primary sources and extensive quotations from secondary sources (history books and articles) in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.bi1, N.bi2) Bich's injury: A photo showing the injury mark on the forefront of Dr. Bich as a result of this "intensive and unpleasant interrogation" can be found in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.bjvm) Bich joined Viet Minh: See the quotation from a French doctoral thesis in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.nnbs) Bich street: A street in Can Tho is named Nguyen Ngoc Bich to commemorate him blowing up the Cai-Rang Bridge in this city to stop the French troops advance in 1945–46.[43] The short biography in Vietnamese, together with an English translation, in this street-naming plan is provided in the document Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography,[9]

  • (↑ N.bvm) Bich Viet Minh: The Viet Minh is "nationalist front organization with many non-communist members, but under communist domination, most clearly at the level of the top leadership."[25]:23 That Bich joined the Viet Minh in 1945 was mentioned in a French PhD dissertation with page image provided in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911-1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.bvm) British-French arrived: "Depuis le 12 septembre [1945] en effet,par petits paquets, les troupes alliées arrivent par avion : une compagnie française du 5ème RIC, un bataillon gurkha de la 20ème division indienne du général Douglas D. Gracey, que Mount­batten a désignée pour opérer le désarmement des Japonais en Indochine du Sud."[1]:156

  • (↑ N.cd) Cao Dai: "Appealing largely to the uneducated and essentially superstitious masses, the Cao Dai mushroomed in size to over five hundred thousand by 1930, giving the French authorities cause for concern. A schism took place in 1933 when Pham Cong Tac, one of the original founders, organized a secret sect known as Pham Mon to exploit political objectives. With the death of Pope Le Van Trung in 1936, Tac seized control of the temple at Tay Ninh and proclaimed himself 'interim Pope.' From this point on the Cao Dai split into several distinct sects but retained in all of them a rigid rightist political philosophy, conservative in nature and vehemently anticommunist and promonarchical."[21]:501 [23]:97
At first, the French colonialists tolerated the Cao Dai, prefering religious sects over Communists, allowing it to be practiced in Cochinchina (south Vietnam), but not in Annam (central Vietnam) and Tonkin (north Vietnam).[23]:98 "In 1940-41, the French altitude changed in Cochinchina loo, since it was realized that the new religion had turned into a pro-Japanese force.[47]:252 Citing messages from above, Caodaist priests predicted the certain victory of the Axis."[23]:98
In the Spring of 1941, the Caodaistes found themselves in serious difficulty with the French administration, and sought help and protection from the Japanese, who were not in a position to provide. As a result, the Caodaistes were crushed by the French, with Cao Dai leaders sent into exile. By December of 1941, the "famed" Kempeitai, the Japanese political police modeled after the Gestapo, came to Indochina, and provided help and protection to the Caodaistes and other nationalist factions.[1]:89-90 (In Devillers (1952)[1]:90, "Kempeitai" was translated into French as "Gendarmerie" and "police politique", whereas in Patti (1980)[21]:41, "kempeitai" was translated as "security police".)
After the Japanese coup de force on 1945 Mar 9, being pro-Japanese,[21]:76 [23]:103,373 the Cao Dai sect along with other pro-Japanese groupsN.atr in the United National Front (Mặt Trận Quốc Gia Thống Nhứt),[21]:524 established on 1945 Aug 14,[21]:554 were convinced by Tran Van Giau, a Viet Minh leader in Cochinchina---and later "a prominent Vietnamese historian who organized the 1945 revolution in Saigon and the whole of Cochinchina (Nam Ky)"[23]:21---that they all would be "outlawed"[21]:186 by the invading Allied, agreed to an alliance under the leadership of the Viet Minh.[51] [21]:524
After the Japanese officially surrendered on 1945 Sep 2, the same day that Ho Chi Minh declared Vietnam Independence, General Leclerc (on 1945 Oct 5)[21]:454 and the French 5th Régiment d'Infanterie Colonial (RIC,[21]:xv Colonial Infantry Regiment, on 1945 Oct 3)[21]:454 were brought back to Cochinchina with the help of the British. The advance units of British troops, the 20th Indian Division, and of the French 5th RIC were flown into Saigon on 1945 Sep 12.[21]:455
"The contentious character of the nationalist movement in the south facilitated Leclerc's 'pacification campaign' at the end of 1945 and the beginning of 1946. He took on the armies of the Hoa Hao, the Cao Dai, and the Viet Minh one after the other. At first, he seemed to score a resounding military success. Many Caodaists rallied to the French. By March, Leclerc estimated that his troops controlled, not just the cities, but also 80 percent of the villages. Politically, however, France had confronted and alienated much of the population, and when the Viet Minh reorganized its forces and started to cooperate more systematically with the religious sects, guerrilla activity resurfaced in most of the areas the French thought they had pacified."[25]:74
On 1946 Apr 10, Nguyen Binh, the equivalent of Vo Nguyen Giap in the south,[25]:75 formed the Unified National Front (Mặt Trận Quốc Gia Liên Hiệp, "Front National Unifié"),[1]:253 composed of the Cao Dai and the same former pro-Japanese groups that were in the United National Front, established less than one year before on 1945 Aug 14, as mentioned above.
The side switching of these groups prompted Ho Chi Minh to describe the pro-Japanese politicians as "weathercocks who were pro-French yesterday, pro-Jap today, and pro someone else tomorrow."[23]:105

  • (↑ N.clc) Chester Cooper: A summary of an obituary[44] for Chester L. Cooper is in the document Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.dcc) Cooper, PhD: Chester L. Cooper undertook his doctoral study in urban land economics, and after an interruption due to WWII, received his PhD in 1960.[45]

  • (↑ N.chac) Churchill, Atlantic Charter: "Both Churchill and many members of his Cabinet were alarmed by the third point of the Charter, which mentions the rights of all peoples to choose their own government. Churchill was concerned that this clause acknowledged the right of colonial subjects to agitate for decolonization, including those in Great Britain’s empire." Churchill wanted to "bind the United States closer to Great Britain," warned his cabinet on 1941 Aug 11 "that it would be “imprudent” to raise unnecessary difficulties. The Cabinet followed Churchill’s recommendation and approved the Charter."[36]

  • (↑ N.cf45) Cold February 1945: It has never been that cold. The temperature went down to four degrees Celcius at noon in Hanoi on 1945 Feb 13, Tết, new year day, Lunar year Ất-Dậu ("13-2-1945, Tết Nguyên Đán Ất-Dậu. Chưa bao giờ rét như thế này. Tại Hà Nội, buổi trưa, hàn thử biểu xuống tới 4 độ"[52]:3).

  • (↑ N.dar, N.dar2) D'Argenlieu recalled: D'Argenlieu was recalled back to France because of the intense dislike that he caused among the Vietnamese and among the Socialists and Communists in France,[21]:394 who gave him the nickname "The Bloody Monk,"[15]:163 who was "widely believed to have sparked the war with his aggressive actions in 1946, in clear violation of the March 6 Accords [1946] and without informing Paris, [by recognizing] the autonomous 'Republic of Cochin China' in the name of France."[15]:137,180,189 Such recognition went against the stipulation of a referendum for the unification of the three regions ("Kỳ", i.e., Cochinchina, Annam, Tonkin) in the March 6 Accords.N.m6a2 D'Argenlieu was also known as the "abomination of Vietnam,"[21]:394 whom Bao Dai was averse to have any dealings with.

  • (↑ N.cdg1, N.cdg2) De Gaulle: The permanent undersecretary at the British Foreign Office knew only that de Gaulle had a 'head like a pineapple and hips like a woman's', whereas the counselor at the US embassy in Paris and most of de Gaulle compatriots never heard of him.[15]:24 By Aug 1946, de Gaulle had resigned from the presidency of the French Provisional Government on 1946 Jan 20.[53]

  • (↑ N.dgd) De Gaulle's dream: In 1940-41, in exchange for retaining control over Indochina and Thailand, both the French and the Thai agreed to let the Japanese Navy, Air Force, and Army use, for their military conquest, the harbors, air fields, and terrain in Indochina and Thailand.[23]:81 Meanwhile, in exile in London, De Gaulle later wrote in his war memoirs: "À moi-même, menant une bien petite barque sur l'océan de la guerre, L'Indochine apparaissait alors comme un grand navire désemparé que je ne pourrais secourir avant d'avoir longuement réuni les moyens du sauvetage. Le voyant s'éloigner dans la brume, je me jurais à moi-même de le ramener un jour." Ch. de Gaulle, Mémoires de guerre, Tome I, L'appel. 1940-42. p. 137.[23]:81(n3)

  • (↑ N.dii) Devillers incorrect info: Devillers (1952) received incorrect information that Ho was in "Tsin Tsi" (Jingxi, Guangxi, China) as he wrote:[1]:97 "En mai 1941, il réussit à convoquer à Tsin Tsi dans le Kwang Si, à 100 km environ au Nord de Cao Bang, un 'Congrès' (In May 1941, he succeeded in calling for a plenum at Jingxi in the Guangxi province, about 100 km north of the Cao Bang province)."

  • (↑ N.frd) FDR died: "Then, on April 12, as Roosevelt was once again on vacation---at his compound in Warm Springs, Georgia---he complained of a headache, slumped back in his chair, and died."[38]

  • (↑ N.fhh) Fenn helped Ho: OSS Lt. Charles Fenn helped "make Ho Chi Minh the undisputed leader of the Viet Minh in 1945".[29]:96

  • (↑ N.fa1, N.fa2) Francophile anticolonialists: "French teachings and models over Confucian ones. Some of these teachings were, to say the least, unhelpful to the colonial enterprise. Voltaire's condemnation of tyranny, Rousseau's embrace of popular sovereignty, and Victor Hugo's advocacy of liberty and defense of workers' uprisings turned some Vietnamese into that curious creature found also elsewhere in the empire: the Francophile anticolonialist."[15]:9

  • (↑ N.fwc) French-war cost: PBS US Involvement in Vietnam Video time 0:11 to 0:32:[54] "In 1952, General Dwight Eisenhower was elected President, in part because he promised to take a tougher stance on communism. That year, American taxpayers were footing more than 30% of the bill for the French war in Vietnam (also called the "French-American" war[14]). Within two years, that number would rise to nearly 80%." To be more precise, the "U.S. aid to the French military effort mounted from $130 million in 1950 to $800 million in 1953."[55]:597 The "United States became France's largest patron, ultimately funding 78 percent of the French war effort in Indochina,"reported historian L.H.T. Nguyen based on the Vietnamese document "Tong ket cuoc khang chien chong thuc dan Phap," Hanoi: Chinh Tri Quoc Gia, 1996.[56]:46

  • (↑ N.ehb) Hammer (1954): Ellen Hammer's 1954 book The Struggle for Indochina[11] was "A superb study of the French effort to hold on to Indochina."[57]

  • (↑ N.uah) Hurley, US Ambassador: Patrick Hurley was identified as "Major Gen. Patrick J. Hurley,"[21]:13 a “personal representative” in China for Roosevelt,[21]:15 and then “Ambassador Hurley” by 1945 Mar 9.[21]:63 Until around 1944 Nov 1-17, the US Ambassador to China was Clarence E. Gauss,[21]:15who resigned, and Gen. Hurley was appointed as US Ambassador.[21]:453 Thus, Patrick Hurley was correctly referred to as Roosevelt’s "ambassador to China" when Truman was president, after Roosevelt had died:[18]:66 "On [1945] March 8, the day before the Japanese struck against the French, Roosevelt gave separate audiences in the White House to his ambas­sador to China, Patrick Hurley; the commander of the China theatre forces, General Albert C. Wedemeyer; and Admiral William F. Halsey, who had raided the Indochina coast on January 12."

  • (↑ N.ejh) (Ellen J.) Hammer received her PhD from Columbia University, where she specialized in international relations, with a dissertation on public law and government.[10] A summary of an obituary for Ellen J. Hammer is in the document Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography.[9]

  • (↑ N.hcm1) HCM quote1: From 1945 Aug 26 to 1980, when Patti published his book.[21]:4

  • (↑ N.hos) HCM and OSS: For the relationship between the OSS and Ho Chi Minh during WWII, see the article OSS Deer Team and the book The OSS and Ho Chi Minh.[29]

  • (↑ N.haa) Ho admires Americans: As cited in Logevall (2012),[15]:721 Note 22, p. 721: "Former New York Times Saigon correspondent A. J. Langguth, in his fine history of the American war, refers to Ho Chi Minh's 'lifelong admiration for Americans.' "[7]:55

  • (↑ N.hac) Ho and Atlantic Charter: In his letter to the US Chairman of Foreign Affairs Association, Ho referred to the Atlantic Charter several times, twice on Page 1 alone: (1) " As a signatory power of the Atlantic and San-Francisco Charters, the United States of America have to be well informed on the real state of affairs", (2) "These principles of international justice and equality of status have been clearly expressed and solemnly proclaimed in point 3 and 4N.p4a of the Atlantic Charter and subsequently reiterated in the San Francisco Charter".[58]

  • (↑ N.hcn) Ho, communist or nationalist? "For many decades there would be a heated debate among diplomats, politicians and political scientists in every corner of the world as to whether Ho Chi Minh was a communist or a nationalist. The answer is that he was both."[23]:120 This view is consistent with that of Jean Sainteny who wrote in his 1972 memoir: "I have been asked countless times, `Was Ho Chi Minh pri­marily a Nationalist or a Communist?' My reply is always the same: Ho Chi Minh was both. For him nationalism and communism were, respectively, goal and the means to attain that goal. The two complemented each other, merged."[34]:20

  • (↑ N.hgp) Ho gave pistols: That Ho gave the new pistols to his rivals, but not to his own people, testified to his political acumen in rallying his rivals to accept him as the top leader.[59]
Ho Chi Minh and Sainteny on the seaplane Catalina, on their way to meet d'Argenlieu on the battleship Emile-Bertin, 1946 Mar 24.

  • (↑ N.hsc) Ho and Sainteny on Catalina: On 1946 Mar 24, Ho and Jean Saiteny boarded the seaplane Catalina that took them to meet Admiral Thierry d'Argenlieu on the French battleship Emile-Bertin, mooring in the Ha Long Bay.

  • (↑ N.hif) Ho in France 1946: See Youtube video French involvement in Vietnam & Dien Bien Phu - 1962, time 2:09, showing the moment Ho's plane landed in Paris and the subsequent greetings the French government giving to Ho as a head of state. Flying with Ho from Biarritz to Paris, Sainteny recalled: "At four o'clock we were over Paris. The Bourget airport was thick with crowds of people. Marius Moutet, Minister of Colonies, was there, surrounded by numerous distin­guished civilians and military notables representing the French government. Above the airport floated the associated flags of France and Vietnam."[34]:76

  • (↑ N.htp) Ho in Tienpao prison: Tienpao in the Wade-Giles transliteration is Tianbao in pinyin. See the analysis in Notes on Vietnam History.[59]
Ho Chi Minh took refuge in the jungle to battle French forces.[34].

  • (↑ N.hvn) Ho in Vietnam 1944: A French report at that time stated: "more than 200 political refugees had passed from China to Tonkin, most of them armed with pistols and daggers (poiguards), and that among them was a certain 'Nguyen Hai Quoc', who had crossed the border under the name of 'Ho Chi Minh'. Nguyen Hai Quoc, a man 'around sixty years old', was 'the probable leader' of the Viet Minh: 'Under Nguyen Hai Quoc's leadership, the new elements coming from Kwangsi have undertaken to reawaken the movement and bring back to their former activities the implacables who had taken refuge in the mountains.' "[23]:118, 208

  • (↑ N.hir) Ho's insight for revolution: Ho was convinced that with the Japanese occupation of Indochina and "with international events moving fast and Decoux's government isolated from metropolitan France, the potential for revolution in Vietnam was much enhanced."[15]

  • (↑ N.hvi) HCM Vietnam Independence : For a detailed comparative analysis between the US Declaration of Independence and Ho Chi Minh’s Declaration of Vietnam Independence, see Notes of Vietnam History.[59] "Bao Dai, the French-protected emperor of Annam, with nominal authority also in Tonkin, had gained nominal independence aer Japan ousted the French regime in March 1945. When he abdicated voluntarily in August 1945, he ceded his powers to the new Democratic Republic. Shortly before Bao Dai abdicated, his government had obtained from Japan something that France had always refused to concede: sovereignty also in Nam Ky (Cochinchina), hitherto under direct French rule, where the emperor had previously had no say." [25]:12

  • (↑ N.jls) (Jean) Lacouture spoke: See Lacouture speaking about Ho Chi Minh in the 1968 documentary In the Year of the Pig at video time 8:11.

  • (↑ N.dlb) Lancaster book: Donald Lancaster's 1961 book The Emancipation of French Indochina[13] was "The best single book on the history of all Indochina to about 1955".[57]

  • (↑ N.laa) Leclerc accepted assignment: Devillers (1952) wrote that Leclerc accepted his assignment on 1945 May 22 to command two French divisions placed under the general command of American forces in the Pacific ("Dès lors, c’est à obtenir la participation française à cet assaut que Paris voue ses efforts. Le 26 mai, le Gouvernement français offre à Washington de mettre à la disposition du Commandement américain dans le Pacifique un Corps d'Armée à deux divisions. Le general Leclerc, chef de la prestigieuse 2ème Division Blindée, le vainqueur de Koufra, de Paris, de Strasbourg et de Berchtesgaden, le plus connu et le plus populaire des chefs militaires français, a accepté le 22 mai d’en prendre le commandement.").

  • (↑ N.leh) Leclerc entered Hanoi: "Dès le premier contact, il mettra Ho Chi Minh en confiance. « Alors, Monsieur le Président, on est d’accord maintenant ? » s'écriera-t-il de sa voix dure, un peu trainante, en s'avançant la main largement ouverte vers le vieux révolutionnaire... Comme il a fait mettre à tous ses véhicules des drapeaux français et vietnamiens, il a demandé, pour sa villa, une garde mixte de 15 Francais et de 15 Viêts."[1]:238

  • (↑ N.m6a1, N.m6a2, N.m6a3) March 6 Accords: "Ho Chi Minh saw no option but to negotiate. In the spring of 1946 he offered concessions to the French, agreeing to permit them to re­turn to the north to displace the Chinese. He also agreed to affiliate an autonomous Vietnam with the French Union, a loose federation of states linked to France. In return, French negotiator Jean Sainteny pledged that there would be a national referendum to determine whether Cochinchina, the southern part of Vietnam, would rejoin Annam and Tonkin in a reunited Vietnamese state or remain a separate French territory."[60]:7
Point 1 of the March 6 Accords stipulated that the French government recorgnized the Republic of Vietnam as a "Free state" within the French Union, and regarding Cochinchina, a referendum would be organized to unify the three regions of Vietnam, and the French government would ratify the decisions of the voting population ("Le Gouvernement français reconnait la République du Viêt-Nam comme un État libre ayant son governement, son parlement, son armée et ses finances, faisant partie de la Fédération Indochinoise et de l'Union Française. En ce qui concerne la réunion des trois 'Ky', le gouvernement Français s'engage à entériner les décisions prises par la population consultée par référendum").[1]:225

  • (↑ N.mtl) Moffat memo on Krull: Abbot Low Moffat, "who headed the Division for Southeast Asian [SEA] Affairs at [the] State" [Department],[21]:381 wrote a memo on 1947 Feb 24 about Germaine Krull's 1945 report[41] as follows: "The underlying diary by a former French war correspondent (Germaine Krull) describes the Allied occupation of Saigon, September 12 to 24, 1945. The report is by far the most graphic, vivid, and absorbing account of this critical period, which witnessed the beginning of the war in Indochina, which has reached SEA. Highlights have been marked in blue pencil, but the report is well worth reading in its entirety."[41]

  • (↑ N.mtl) Mountbatten to Leclerc: "Si Roosevelt vivait encore, vous ne rentreriez pas en Indochine."[1]:153

  • (↑ N.ng1, N.ng2) Napalm girl: A photo of the scars on the back and arm of Phan Thị Kim Phúc, the "napalm girl", is given in Stockton (2022).[61]

  • (↑ N.bq1, N.bq2) NNB quotations: See more detailed quotations in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography[9]

  • (↑ N.naq) Nguyen Ai Quoc: Hoang Quoc Viet recounted in his 1981 interview with the PBS: "I was sent to the southern part of the country at one point to discuss things with our comrades there. The discussion was very heated and it was very difficult to iron things out. Then I happened to mention the name Ho Chi Minh. These people in the south asked me who Ho Chi Minh was. I told them that he was Nguyen Ai Quoc. They all stood up and clapped and said that as I was a representative sent by Ho Chi Minh then there was no need for any further discussion. This was because at that time there was a feud going on between the so called "Old Viet Minhs" and "New Viet Minhs". But when they heard from me that Ho Chi Minh was indeed Nguyen Ai Quoc, they were all overjoyed, saying that if Nguyen Ai Quoc had returned home to lead the movement then everything would be solved, that there should be unity and solidarity."

  • (↑ N.pvar) Power vacuum to August Revolution: "In August and September 1945, the white-bearded Ho Chi Minh emerged as the winner of the Indochina game. ... He expected an Allied invasion and prepared himself for assisting the invading forces. Instead he got a power vacuum and a sudden Japanese surrender. This provided him with an occasion more favorable for bloodless revolution than he could ever have imagined. He then proclaimed the republic that would later defeat both France and the United States."[18]:73

  • (↑ N.psq1, N.psq2, N.psq3) Primary sources, quotations: See primary sources, extensive notes and quotations in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography[9] and Notes on Vietnam History.[59]

  • (↑ N.tcc) Taberd Cochin China: Jean-Louis Taberd was likely among the first to explain the meaning of "Cochin China" in his 1837 scientific article; see quotation in Notes on Vietnam History.[59]

  • (↑ N.tac) "They" in Atlantic Charter: "They" here means FDR and Churchill and their respective governments.[36]

  • (↑ N.vt) (Virginia) Thompson was the first British historian with a deep knowledge on French Indochina with her 1937 book French Indo-China (Internet Archive), George Allen & Unwin LTD, London. Also see the review of this book: French Indo-China By Virginia Thompson (New York: Macmillan Company, 1937, pp.516, $5.00), reviewed by H.I. Priestley, The American Historical Review, Volume 43, Issue 4, July 1938, Pages 876–877, https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/43.4.876
Allied flags at half staff on 1945 Apr 13, the day after FDR died.

  • (↑ N.tfp) Truman foreign policy: After Roosevelt died on 1945 Apr 12, "U.S. policy fell into the hands of Truman, who had no idea what Roosevelt had really wanted to achieve or how he had planned to achieve it. Over the coming three years, Truman would take this ignorance, combined with Stalin's strategic overreach and blundering, and create the Cold War that Roosevelt had always been keen to avoid."[38]

  • (↑ N.uii) US invasion of Indochina: The US was the only country among the Allies (British and Chinese) that could invade Indochina; see Chap. 4, Colliding Plans, in Tønnesson (1991).[23]:156

  • (↑ N.uwp) US war plan: "... to confuse the Japanese, possibly the French as well, concerning US intentions. Perhaps Roosevelt meant the plan seriously at first, and then changed it into a deceptive operation when he realized that it could not be carried out ... Indochina came to play a similar role in Roosevelt's war against Japan as Norway occupied in Churchill's war against Germany. For a long time, Churchill toyed with the idea of a Norwegian landing as a way of securing the transport route to Russia and bringing Sweden into the war. Then, when his generals and admirals adamantly refused to carry out the project, Norway instead became the focus of elaborate deception and diversion plans, aiming at inducing Hitler to keep as many troops as possible in an irrelevant theatre."[23]:170, 220

  • (↑ N.vat) Vietnam-America troops: "From the group of 110 assembled recruits, their field commander Dam Quang Trung and the Deer Team chose 40 of the 'most promising' young men to begin training immediately. The eager recruits who would be working with the Deer Team were officially christened by Ho Chi Minh the Bo Doi Viet-My, the 'Vietnamese-American Force.'"[29]:209 On "August 16, 1945, the Deer Team and the Vietnamese-American Force left Tan Trao... Both Thomas and Vo Nguyen Giap were anxious to leave for Thai Nguyen," which was on their way to Hanoi.[29]:216 When the Vietnamese-American Force attacked the Japanese garrison at Thai-Nguyen, "Nguyen Chinh remembered that the surrender document that he typed mentioned the Americans as well: 'We the Liberation Army and the Vietnam-America troops, commanded by the Viet Minh organization, already encircled tightly this garrison. We demand the [Japanese] troops inside the garrison accept the following conditions.' "[29]:369 Note 20

  • (↑ N.vid) Vietnam Indepence Day: That was 1945 Sep 2, the day Ho Chi Minh declared Vietnam's Independence, and also the day the Japanese formally surrendered on the USS Missouri.

  • (↑ N.vmm) Viet Minh manifesto: "Union de toutes les couches sociales, de toutes les organisations révolutionnaires, de toutes les minorités ethniques. Alliance avec tous les autres peuples opprimés de l'Indochine. Collaboration avec tous les élements antifascistes français. Un but: la destruction du colonialisme et de l'impérialisme fascistes."[1]:97

  • (↑ N.vqf) VQL Foreword: See the Foreword and Bich's open letter in Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911-1966): A Biography[9]

  • (↑ N.wtk) Walking to Kunming: It takes about two weeks to walk from Pác Bó to Kunming using likely the same road (among several others) undertaken by the invading Mongols in the thirteen century.[62]

  • (↑ N.ytp1, N.ytp2) Year of the Pig: In his interview in the 1968 documentary In the Year of the Pig, Paul Mus, whom High Commissioner d'Argenlieu sent to meet Ho Chi Minh in Hanoi at the end of 1945 (video time 12:17) recounted (time 13:56): "Ho Chi Minh said [in 1945], 'I have no army.' That's not true now [in 1968]. 'I have no army.' 1945. 'I have no finance. I have no diplomacy. I have no public instruction. I have just hatred and I will not disarm it until you give me confidence in you.' Now this is the thing on which I would insist because it's still alive in his memory, as in mine. For every time Ho Chi Minh has trusted us, we betrayed him." See also a 2016 review[63] of this 1968 documentary In the Year of the Pig.

References

Marr 2013[64],

  1. 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 Devillers, Philippe (1952), Histoire du Viêt-Nam de 1940 à 1952, Seuil, Paris. See also Philippe Devillers (1920–2016), un secret nommé Viêt-Nam, Mémoires d'Indochine, Internet archived 2022.06.29. Patti (1980), p.542, wrote about Devillers (1952): "The most accurate French account of the period; barring several omissions and minor inaccuracies generally attributable to his sources and to the lack of American documentation, it is by far one of the more reliable histories."
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Buttinger, Joseph (1967b), Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol.2, Frederik A. Praegers, New York. Retrieved on 25 Feb 2023
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 Cooper, Chester L. (1970), The Lost Crusade: America in Vietnam, Dood, Mead & Company, New York. Retrieved on 7 Mar 2023
  4. 4.0 4.1 Nguyen-Ngoc-Bich (March 1962), "Vietnam—An Independent Viewpoint", The China Quarterly 9. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2023, pp. 105–111. See also the contents of Volume 9, which included the articles of many well-known experts on Vietnam history and politics such as Bernard B. Fall, Hoang Van Chi, Phillipe Devillers (see, e.g., his classic 1952 book Histoire du Viet-Nam in Section References and French Cochinchina, Ref. 42), P. J. Honey, Gerard Tongas (see, e.g, J'ai vécu dans l'Enfer Communiste au Nord Viet-Nam, Debresse, Paris, 1961, reviewed] by P. J. Honey), among others.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Nguyen-Ngoc-Chau (2018), Le Temps des Ancêtres: Une famille vietnamienne dans sa traversée du XXe siècle, L'Harmattan, Paris, France. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2023. Preface by historian Pierre Brocheux.
  6. Tran-Thi-Lien (2002), Henriette Bui: The narrative of Vietnam's first woman doctor, in Gisele Bousquet and Pierre Brocheux, Viêt Nam Exposé: French Scholarship on Twentieth-Century Vietnamese Society, University of Michigan Press, ISBN 9780472098057, DOI:10.3998/mpub.12124, at 278–309. Google Book (search for "Bui Quang Chieu Ngoc Bich"), accessed 20 May 2023.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 Langguth, Arthur John (2000), Our Vietnam: The war, 1954–1975, Simon & Schuster, New York. Retrieved on 14 Mar 2023
  8. 8.0 8.1 Honey, P.J., ed. (March 1962), "Special Issue on Vietnam", The China Quarterly 9. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2023.
  9. 9.00 9.01 9.02 9.03 9.04 9.05 9.06 9.07 9.08 9.09 9.10 9.11 Nguyen-Ngoc-Chau & Vu-Quoc-Loc (2023), Nguyen Ngoc Bich (1911–1966): A Biography, Internet Archive. Retrieved on 21 Mar 2023, CC-BY-SA 4.0. (Backup copy.) Much of the information in the present article came from this biography, which also contains many relevant and informative photos not displayed here.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Pace, Eric (2001), Ellen Hammer, 79; Historian Wrote on French in Indochina, Mar 26.
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 11.3 Hammer, Ellen J. (1954), The Struggle for Indochina, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California. Retrieved on 11 Mar 2023.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Osborne, Milton (1967), "Viet-Nam: The Search for Absolutes", International Journal 22 (4): 647–654, DOI:10.2307/40200203. Retrieved on 18 Feb 2023.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Lancaster, Donald (1961), The Emancipation of French Indochina, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Oxford University Press, New York; reprinted by Octagon Books, New York, 1975. Retrieved on 11 Mar 2023
  14. 14.0 14.1 Lady Borton (2020), WE NEVER KNEW: Napalm use during Vietnam's French-American War, vietnamnet.vn, May 5. Also archive.is 2024.10.19.
  15. 15.00 15.01 15.02 15.03 15.04 15.05 15.06 15.07 15.08 15.09 15.10 15.11 15.12 15.13 15.14 15.15 15.16 15.17 15.18 15.19 15.20 15.21 15.22 15.23 15.24 15.25 15.26 15.27 Logevall, Fredrik (2012), Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America's Vietnam, Random House, New York. Retrieved on 12 Apr 2012, 864 pp. Winner of the 2013 Pulitzer Prize in History: "For a distinguished and appropriately documented book on the history of the United States, Ten thousand dollars ($10,000). A balanced, deeply researched history of how, as French colonial rule faltered, a succession of American leaders moved step by step down a road toward full-blown war" • Winner of the 2013 Francis Parkman Prize from the Society of American Historians • Winner of the 2013 American Library in Paris Book Award • Winner of the Council on Foreign Relations 2013 Gold Medal Arthur Ross Book Award • Finalist for the 2013 Cundill Prize in Historical Literature.
  16. 16.0 16.1 Caffery, Jefferson (1945-03-13), The Ambassador in France (Caffery) to the Secretary of State, Foreign Relations of the United States (FRUS): Diplomatic Papers, 1945, The British Commonwealth, The Far East, Volume VI. (Edward Stettinius Jr. was the Secretary of State on 1945 Mar 13.)
  17. Vietnam: A Television History; Roots of a War; Interview with Archimedes L. A. Patti, 1981, 1981-04-01
  18. 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 18.12 18.13 18.14 18.15 18.16 18.17 18.18 18.19 18.20 18.21 18.22 Tønnesson, Stein (2007), Franklin Roosevelt, Trusteeship and Indochina: A reassessment, The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, at 56-73, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  19. Marr, David G. (1995), Vietnam 1945: The Quest for Power, University of California Press, Berkeley. Retrieved on 2024-07-05.
  20. Rotter, Andrew J. (2007), Chronicle of a War Foretold: The United States and Vietnam, 1945-1954, The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, at 282-306, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  21. 21.00 21.01 21.02 21.03 21.04 21.05 21.06 21.07 21.08 21.09 21.10 21.11 21.12 21.13 21.14 21.15 21.16 21.17 21.18 21.19 21.20 21.21 21.22 21.23 21.24 21.25 21.26 21.27 21.28 21.29 21.30 21.31 21.32 21.33 21.34 21.35 21.36 21.37 21.38 21.39 21.40 21.41 21.42 21.43 21.44 21.45 21.46 21.47 21.48 21.49 21.50 Patti, Archimedes (1980), Why Viet Nam? Prelude to America's Albatross, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0520047839
  22. Marr, David G. (1984), Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920-1945, University of California Press, Berkeley. Retrieved on 2024-05-05.
  23. 23.00 23.01 23.02 23.03 23.04 23.05 23.06 23.07 23.08 23.09 23.10 23.11 23.12 23.13 23.14 23.15 23.16 23.17 23.18 23.19 23.20 23.21 23.22 23.23 Tønnesson, Stein (1991), The Vietnamese Revolution of 1945: Roosevelt, Ho Chi Minh and de Gaulle in a world at war, SAGE Publications, London. Retrieved on 2024-05-05. Link to this book at the Norwegian National Library.
  24. Vigneras, Marcel, Rearming the French, U.S. Army in World War II, Center for Military History CMH Pub 11-6, Washington DC, 444 pages.
  25. 25.00 25.01 25.02 25.03 25.04 25.05 25.06 25.07 25.08 25.09 25.10 25.11 25.12 Tønnesson, Stein (2010), Vietnam 1946: How the War Began, University of California Press, Berkeley, California. Retrieved on 2024-05-05.
  26. 26.0 26.1 "Dr. Paul Mus dies; a Yale professor. Southeast Asia authority also taught in France", New York Times, 16 August 1969.
  27. Brocheux, Pierre (2007), Ho Chi Minh: A Biography, translated by Claire Duiker, Cambridge University Press, New York. Retrieved on 2024-05-20.
  28. Fenn, Charles (1973), Ho Chi Minh: A Biographical Introduction, Studio Vista, London. Retrieved on 2023-12-27.
  29. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 Bartholomew-Feis, Dixee (2006), The OSS and Ho Chi Minh: Unexpected Allies in the War against Japan, University Press of Arkansas, Lawrence, Kansas. Retrieved on 2024-05-23.
  30. Tram-Huong (2003), Đêm trắng của Đức Giáo Tông (Sleepless Night of the Cao Dai Pope), People's Police Publishing House, Vietnam.
  31. Nguyen-Ngoc-Chau (20 Jul 2021), The basic truths on Caodaism, education.edu.
  32. 32.0 32.1 Marr, David G. (2007), Creating Defense Capacity in Vietnam, 1945-1947, The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, at 74-104, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  33. Gunn, Geoffrey C. (2013-03-25), "Prelude to the First Indochina War: New Light on the Fontainebleau Conference of July-September 1946 and Aftermath", Southeast Asian Studies Annual Report 54: 19-51.
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 34.3 34.4 34.5 34.6 Sainteny, Jean (1972), Ho Chi Minh and his Vietnam, Cowles Book Company, Inc., Chicago. Translated from the 1970 French version Face à Ho Chi Minh by Herma Briffault.
  35. Giniger, Henry (1984-10-14), America Inside Out, Close to Events, book review.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 The Atlantic Conference & Charter, 1941, Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations, 1937–1945, US Dept of State, 1941. Retrieved on 21 Apr 2023.
  37. 37.0 37.1 Ho-Chi-Minh (1945-10-22), Letter to US Secretary of State James F. Byrnes. Page 1, Page 2, Page 3.
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 38.4 38.5 O'Brien, Phillips P. (2024-09-01), "Roosevelt, Yalta, and the Origins of the Cold War", Foreign Policy.
  39. 39.0 39.1 Fall, Bernard B. (1966), The Two Viet-Nams: A political and military analysis, Frederick A. Praeger, New York. Retrieved on 4 Oct 2024
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 Lawrence, Mark A. (2007), Forging the "Great Combination", The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, at 105-129, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  41. 41.0 41.1 41.2 Krull, Germaine (1945), Diary of Saigon, following the Allied occupation in September 1945. Retrieved on 2024-11-03. Internet Archive 2024.11.19
  42. McHale, Shawn F. (2021), The First Vietnam War: Violence, Sovereignty, and the Fracture of the South, 1945-1956, Cambridge University Press.
  43. 43.0 43.1 Street-naming plan in Can Tho, Vietnam, with biographies, Appendix 1, 9 Apr 2019. Retrieved on 15 Mar 2023. Internet archived 2023.02.10.
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 Fox, Margalit (2005), Chester Cooper, 88, a Player in Diplomacy for Two Decades, Is Dead, Nov 7.
  45. 45.0 45.1 Colman, Jonathan (2012), "Lost crusader? Chester L. Cooper and the Vietnam War, 1963–68", Cold War History 12 (3): 429–449, DOI:10.1080/14682745.2011.573147.
  46. 46.0 46.1 46.2 Lambert, Bruce (1992-03-08), "Joseph A. Buttinger, Nazi Fighter And Vietnam Scholar, Dies at 85", The New York Times.
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 Buttinger, Joseph (1967a), Vietnam: A Dragon Embattled, Vol.1, Frederik A. Praegers, New York. Retrieved on 25 Feb 2023
  48. Tong, Traci (2018), How the Vietnam War's Napalm Girl found hope after tragedy, The World from PRX, Feb 21. Internet archived on 2023.02.22.
  49. Logevall, Fredrik (2001), The Origins of the Vietnam War, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.. Retrieved on 2024-07-21
  50. How many people died in the Vietnam War?. Retrieved on 30 Mar 2023, Encyclopedia Britannica, Internet Archive 2023.03.28.
  51. Tønnesson, Stein (1985), "The Longest Wars: Indochina 1945-75", Journal of Peace Research 22 (1): 9-29
  52. Đoàn-Thêm (1965), Hai Mươi Năm Qua: Việc Từng Ngày, (1945-1964) (The Last Twenty Years: Daily Events (1945-1964)), Xuân Thu (1986?), Los Alamitos, California. Issuu (read only, cannot search). HathiTrust Digital Library (search only, cannot read).
  53. Charles de Gaulle (1959-1969), Former Presidents of the Republic, 15 November 2018. Retrieved on 13 Jun 2023. Internet archived on 2023.03.28.
  54. US Involvement in Indochina. Retrieved on 2023-12-09, PBS Learning Media, Illinois. Teaching video excerpt from the documentary The Vietnam War, a film by Ken Burns and Lynn Novick.
  55. Encyclopedia of American Foreign Policy, vol. 3, Charles Scribner's & Sons, 2002. Retrieved on 2024-05-11.
  56. The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, 2007, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  57. 57.0 57.1 Gettleman, Marvin E. (1967), A Vietnam Bibliography, Assistant Professor of History, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, with the assistance of Sanford L. Silverman, Liberal Arts Bibliographer. The Libraries, Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Oct 19. Internet archived 2022.01.01
  58. Ho-Chi-Minh (1945-10-22), Letter to US Chairman of Foreign Affairs Association. Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, Page 4.
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 59.3 59.4 59.5 Vu Quoc Loc (2023a), Notes on Vietnam History, Internet Archive. Retrieved on 27 Jun 2023, CC BY-SA 4.0.
  60. Lawrence, Mark A. & Fredrik Logevall (2007), Introduction, The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and the Cold War, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, at 1-15, edited by M.A. Lawrence and F. Logevall.
  61. Stockton, Richard (2022), The True Story Of Phan Thi Kim Phúc, The 'Napalm Girl', edited by Leah Silverman, Dec 25. Internet archived on 2023.03.31.
  62. Vu-Quoc-Loc (2023b), Marco Polo's Caugigu - Phạm Ngũ Lão's Đại Việt - 1285, Internet Archive. Retrieved on 23 Apr 2023, CC BY-SA 4.0.
  63. Browder, Laura (May 1, 2016). “The Meaning of the Soldier: In the Year of the Pig and Hearts and Minds”, A Companion to the War Film, 356–370. DOI:10.1002/9781118337653.ch21.  Internet Archive 2024.06.04
  64. Marr, David G. (2013), Vietnam: State, War, and Revolution (1945-1946), University of California Press, Berkeley.

External links