Talk:Abrogation doctrine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Brian Dean Abramson
(unsigned comment)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law.
It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law.
Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? {{unsigned|Frank van Geelkerken}}
Maybe '''<nowiki>[[Category:Law US]]</nowiki>''' in this case? [[User:Frank van Geelkerken|Frank van Geelkerken]] 11:17, 13 May 2007 (CDT) (added name)
*So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
*So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! [[User:Brian Dean Abramson|Brian Dean Abramson]] 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 02:11, 24 September 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Doctrine of United States constitutional law which determines when and how the United States Congress may waive a state's sovereign immunity and subject the state to lawsuits to which the state has not consented (i.e., to "abrogate" state immunity to such suits). [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Law [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

It might be smart to add a separate category for European, UK, Asian andUS law. Maybe [[Category:Law US]] in this case? Frank van Geelkerken 11:17, 13 May 2007 (CDT) (added name)

  • So far as I have been able to determine, this doctrine is unique to U.S. law, with its clearly delineated state/federal system. I don't know what the criteria is for splitting off categories. Cheers! Brian Dean Abramson 20:42, 2 May 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Abrogation_doctrine&oldid=26172"