Talk:Republican Party (United States): Difference between revisions
imported>Tom Morris (→Naming: new section) |
imported>Russell D. Jones (→Naming: hrrrmmph) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The Republican Party is not actually called the "U.S. Republican Party". It's called the "Republican Party". I think the page should be called "Republican Party (United States)", just like we have "Java (programming language)" rather than "Java programming language" (because Java is a programming language, not a language called "Java programming language"). | The Republican Party is not actually called the "U.S. Republican Party". It's called the "Republican Party". I think the page should be called "Republican Party (United States)", just like we have "Java (programming language)" rather than "Java programming language" (because Java is a programming language, not a language called "Java programming language"). | ||
In two weeks time, on the 21 Feburary 2010, I shall move this page if it hasn't already been moved | In two weeks time, on the 21 Feburary 2010, I shall move this page (if it hasn't already been moved) unless significant objections to moving it have been raised. –[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] 12:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
==Ridiculousness== | |||
Aside from other ironies (along the lines of government-sponsored laisez faire economic policies), doesn't anyone see the ridiculousness of a heading titled "future trends?" [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 00:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 18:42, 28 January 2011
Naming
The Republican Party is not actually called the "U.S. Republican Party". It's called the "Republican Party". I think the page should be called "Republican Party (United States)", just like we have "Java (programming language)" rather than "Java programming language" (because Java is a programming language, not a language called "Java programming language").
In two weeks time, on the 21 Feburary 2010, I shall move this page (if it hasn't already been moved) unless significant objections to moving it have been raised. –Tom Morris 12:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Ridiculousness
Aside from other ironies (along the lines of government-sponsored laisez faire economic policies), doesn't anyone see the ridiculousness of a heading titled "future trends?" Russell D. Jones 00:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- History Developed Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Politics Underlinked Articles
- History tag