Talk:World of Warcraft/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jess Key |
imported>Alexander Wiebel |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 09:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 09:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I agree. -- [[User:Alexander Wiebel|Alexander Wiebel]] 10:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 04:22, 23 March 2010
What's with this? We have a see also page in World of Warcraft, why do we need it twice? -- Melanie St Clair 14:36, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
- Laziness :-( Created as part of the CZ:Subpage Pilot. The 'See also' and 'External links' on the main page article should be moved off to the relevant subpages, but I didn't get around to doing it. Will do so later tonight/early tomorrow. Regards, Anton Sweeney 17:37, 4 August 2007 (CDT)
- Done now. Regards, Anton Sweeney 03:14, 5 August 2007 (CDT)
I don't entirely understand CZ's criteria for related articles, but this list seems to be chosen somewhat at random. I would suggest links to:
- Warcraft series - The single player game that WoW is based on
- Blizzard Entertainment and/or Activision Blizzard - The publishers of the game
- Diablo and Starcraft - Blizzard's other main franchises
I would suggest cutting out most of the other currently 'related' topics in the list. If you wish to link to a Final Fantasy, then XI would be a more reasonable suggestion than IX as IX is single player and XI is an MMORPG.
I would also suggest adding to subtopics:
Chris Key 09:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. -- Alexander Wiebel 10:22, 23 March 2010 (UTC)