User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov/Nevsky Express bombing (2009): Difference between revisions
imported>David Finn (suggesting removal) |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov (→Comments: scientific fact, grammar) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Removal {{Removal|user}} == | |||
== Removal {{Removal| | |||
''Removal suggested by ''[[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 19:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ''Removal suggested by ''[[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 19:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 8: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
=== Comments === | === Comments === | ||
This article uses Wikipedia as a source, and uses another online encyclopedia article (written by the author of ''this'' article) as a source for controversial claims which are then repeated throughout the article without other sources. I appreciate the work put in by the author (especially on the maths articles) but this particular article appears to go beyond Citizendiums rules. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 19:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
:I tend to agree. The sources are in Russian, from Wikipedia or are dead links. Suggest moving to author's user space. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 12:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
::I agree, also other articles by Mr. Kouznetsov need to looked at as well. Among many, of concern is the [[Anti-orphan bill]] article which is poorly written and is essentially a polemic against Russian president Vladimir Putin. Even at the bottom of the page he has listed 'Sadism, Fascism, Cannibalism' as "key words" alongside his name. I'm no fan of Putin, put an encyclopaedia is not the place for articles like that. [[User:Meg Ireland|Meg Ireland]] 13:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
:::Oh, good grief. I'll bring this to the attention of the Council as well. Stuff like this tends to be hidden if people don't add categories or create a metadata page. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 13:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
Dear John Stephenson. Dear Meg Ireland. I respect you point of view; recently I got notification about it, that leaded me to this discussion. | |||
But I still think that you are wrong; in particular, your opinion about Putin is not supported with logics. Putin is terrorist, murderer, who had committed the election fraud in odder to take the superior power. These are already scientific facts. I have collected the explanation at my site, http://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php/Scientific_fact | |||
If you have any doubts, I can copy past my argumentation here. | |||
I think, that the scientific facts deserve to be placed in the encyclopaedia. | |||
Sincerely, [[User:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|Dmitrii Kouznetsov]] ([[User talk:Dmitrii Kouznetsov|talk]]) 14:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:55, 5 February 2016
Removal
Removal suggested by David Finn 19:04, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Editorial Council: Case 2011-xxx
- Opened:
- Closed:
Comments
This article uses Wikipedia as a source, and uses another online encyclopedia article (written by the author of this article) as a source for controversial claims which are then repeated throughout the article without other sources. I appreciate the work put in by the author (especially on the maths articles) but this particular article appears to go beyond Citizendiums rules. David Finn 19:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- I tend to agree. The sources are in Russian, from Wikipedia or are dead links. Suggest moving to author's user space. John Stephenson 12:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, also other articles by Mr. Kouznetsov need to looked at as well. Among many, of concern is the Anti-orphan bill article which is poorly written and is essentially a polemic against Russian president Vladimir Putin. Even at the bottom of the page he has listed 'Sadism, Fascism, Cannibalism' as "key words" alongside his name. I'm no fan of Putin, put an encyclopaedia is not the place for articles like that. Meg Ireland 13:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, good grief. I'll bring this to the attention of the Council as well. Stuff like this tends to be hidden if people don't add categories or create a metadata page. John Stephenson 13:14, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree, also other articles by Mr. Kouznetsov need to looked at as well. Among many, of concern is the Anti-orphan bill article which is poorly written and is essentially a polemic against Russian president Vladimir Putin. Even at the bottom of the page he has listed 'Sadism, Fascism, Cannibalism' as "key words" alongside his name. I'm no fan of Putin, put an encyclopaedia is not the place for articles like that. Meg Ireland 13:04, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear John Stephenson. Dear Meg Ireland. I respect you point of view; recently I got notification about it, that leaded me to this discussion. But I still think that you are wrong; in particular, your opinion about Putin is not supported with logics. Putin is terrorist, murderer, who had committed the election fraud in odder to take the superior power. These are already scientific facts. I have collected the explanation at my site, http://mizugadro.mydns.jp/t/index.php/Scientific_fact If you have any doubts, I can copy past my argumentation here. I think, that the scientific facts deserve to be placed in the encyclopaedia. Sincerely, Dmitrii Kouznetsov (talk) 14:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)