JavaScript/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer mNo edit summary |
imported>Pat Palmer (adding a short overview of the book) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
# D. Crockford, [http://www.amazon.com/JavaScript-Good-Parts-Douglas-Crockford/dp/0596517742/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344930172&sr=8-1&keywords=javascript+the+good+parts|JavaScript The Good Parts]. Yahoo Press; 1 edition (May 2008). | ==Books== | ||
# D. Crockford, [http://www.amazon.com/JavaScript-Good-Parts-Douglas-Crockford/dp/0596517742/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1344930172&sr=8-1&keywords=javascript+the+good+parts| JavaScript The Good Parts]. Yahoo Press; 1 edition (May 2008). This small but definitive (and very popular) book analyzes the language and breaks out the subset of features that programmers can most safely use in their web pages. It also recommends avoiding another subset of features and explains their risks. Finally, the author has provided a popular ''lint''-like validator which people can use to determine whether their use of Javascript meets the recommendations. | |||
Latest revision as of 02:02, 14 August 2012
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Books
- D. Crockford, JavaScript The Good Parts. Yahoo Press; 1 edition (May 2008). This small but definitive (and very popular) book analyzes the language and breaks out the subset of features that programmers can most safely use in their web pages. It also recommends avoiding another subset of features and explains their risks. Finally, the author has provided a popular lint-like validator which people can use to determine whether their use of Javascript meets the recommendations.