Talk:Tree (plant): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Tree
|                cat1 = Biology
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 09:15, 8 March 2007 (CST)
}}
 


I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera.  They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now.  Thoughts?  [[User:Ian Ramjohn|Ian Ramjohn]] 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)
I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera.  They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now.  Thoughts?  [[User:Ian Ramjohn|Ian Ramjohn]] 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)


Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 05:34, 15 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A large, perennial, woody plant. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Biology [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

I think we should de-emphasise the "champion trees" and major tree genera. They might make decent article on their own, they might even be ok further down the page, but I don't think that they should have the sort of precidence they have now. Thoughts? Ian Ramjohn 12:38, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Go ahead, and we'll see. Sounds right. Nancy Sculerati MD 13:06, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Tree_(plant)&oldid=124119"