User talk:Michael Benjamin: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas E Kelly (→reply) |
imported>Thomas E Kelly No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{awelcome}} | {{awelcome}} | ||
| Line 20: | Line 12: | ||
Michael, please you have to include the ''copyright information'' in the images that you upload. Thanks. --[[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 12:35, 12 February 2007 (CST) | Michael, please you have to include the ''copyright information'' in the images that you upload. Thanks. --[[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 12:35, 12 February 2007 (CST) | ||
==reply== | |||
Yes, the de-fork hurt a lot of good medical articles but some, like Lead poisoning at wikipedia are only mediocre. It would be cool to have lead poisoned gums, and a blood smear in the article. Also, if you really want a hard core medicine person who edits a ton, start working with http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Nancy_Sculerati_MD . She is really good. I guess what they want to do is make each article better when they bring it over. I think the anemia article can be improved but I really don't have time to add details right now. I'd like to see more molecular physiology added and more pathophysio mechanisms. Also, almost sadly, medical students reference wikipedia all the time when learning / relearning the basics about a subject. It'd be nice to have a differential approach in mind when writing medical articles. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 01:54, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
: I think [[DNA]] is the next big science article they are working on. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 01:55, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Also, check out the forums. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 02:10, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Dr. Mike, when you take content from wikipedia, just check the "from wikipedia box" on the editing page. We don't want the information at the bottom box about the license to say wikipedia, but it should say from wikipedia. The license stuff is getting worked out but I think the check box in the edit page is the proper policy for now - not sure though. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 22:45, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
:Nevermind, I'm obviously blind from studying around the clock. They changed the box on me and I didn't know which one was which. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 22:48, 12 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 12 February 2007
| Citizendium Getting Started | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quick Start | About us | Help system | Start a new article | For Wikipedians | |||
Tasks: start a new article • add basic, wanted or requested articles • add definitions • add metadata • edit new pages
Welcome to the Citizendium! We hope you will contribute boldly and well. Here are pointers for a quick start, and see Getting Started for other helpful "startup" links, our help system and CZ:Home for the top menu of community pages. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any user or the editors for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and have fun!
Robert Tito | Talk 18:52, 7 February 2007 (CST)
| Citizendium Editor Policy | ||
|---|---|---|
| The Editor Role | Approval Process | Article Deletion Policy |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started and our help system for other introductory pages. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. Announcements are also available via Twitter. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forum is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any administrator for help, too. Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon. --Bernard Haisch 13:28, 11 February 2007 (CST)
Image
Michael, please you have to include the copyright information in the images that you upload. Thanks. --Versuri 12:35, 12 February 2007 (CST)
reply
Yes, the de-fork hurt a lot of good medical articles but some, like Lead poisoning at wikipedia are only mediocre. It would be cool to have lead poisoned gums, and a blood smear in the article. Also, if you really want a hard core medicine person who edits a ton, start working with http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki/User:Nancy_Sculerati_MD . She is really good. I guess what they want to do is make each article better when they bring it over. I think the anemia article can be improved but I really don't have time to add details right now. I'd like to see more molecular physiology added and more pathophysio mechanisms. Also, almost sadly, medical students reference wikipedia all the time when learning / relearning the basics about a subject. It'd be nice to have a differential approach in mind when writing medical articles. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 01:54, 12 February 2007 (CST)
- I think DNA is the next big science article they are working on. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 01:55, 12 February 2007 (CST)
Also, check out the forums. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 02:10, 12 February 2007 (CST)
Dr. Mike, when you take content from wikipedia, just check the "from wikipedia box" on the editing page. We don't want the information at the bottom box about the license to say wikipedia, but it should say from wikipedia. The license stuff is getting worked out but I think the check box in the edit page is the proper policy for now - not sure though. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:45, 12 February 2007 (CST)
- Nevermind, I'm obviously blind from studying around the clock. They changed the box on me and I didn't know which one was which. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 22:48, 12 February 2007 (CST)