User talk:Dan Nachbar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Victor Hoffer (→Thank you and Where to start!: new section) |
imported>Joe Quick (→possible article for approval: new section) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: So I was first wanting to know what CZ's policy, if any, was regarding taking a Wikipedia aticle that is both well-researched and quite accurate and basically importing it ''en total'' over here. There's a couple I've worked on extensively there and believe that, while they may not be perfect, would be a great article here (and the first one that comes up doesn't exist on CZ yet - I checked). | : So I was first wanting to know what CZ's policy, if any, was regarding taking a Wikipedia aticle that is both well-researched and quite accurate and basically importing it ''en total'' over here. There's a couple I've worked on extensively there and believe that, while they may not be perfect, would be a great article here (and the first one that comes up doesn't exist on CZ yet - I checked). | ||
: Thanks in advance for your help. [[User:Victor Hoffer|Victor Hoffer]] 16:51, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | : Thanks in advance for your help. [[User:Victor Hoffer|Victor Hoffer]] 16:51, 13 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
== possible article for approval == | |||
Of the several engineering editors who are active on the wiki, your background would seem to make you the best person to look at the [[Coherer]] article and see if it's ready for approval. It seems like it must be close. Would you mind taking a look? Thanks much. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 12:02, 19 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:02, 19 March 2008
You can leave messages here by clicking on the "+" tab above.
Thank you and Where to start!
- Dan, thank you for the welcome; I'm assuming that you were the constable that approved my initial application. I'm a long-time veteran (well, it seems like a long time to me) of Wikipedia, and one of the antagonizing things there is the un-neutral neutrality and the back-and-forth of removing accurate information that isn't sourced or adding sourced information that is plainly (and commonly known) not to be quite right.
- So I was first wanting to know what CZ's policy, if any, was regarding taking a Wikipedia aticle that is both well-researched and quite accurate and basically importing it en total over here. There's a couple I've worked on extensively there and believe that, while they may not be perfect, would be a great article here (and the first one that comes up doesn't exist on CZ yet - I checked).
- Thanks in advance for your help. Victor Hoffer 16:51, 13 March 2008 (CDT)
possible article for approval
Of the several engineering editors who are active on the wiki, your background would seem to make you the best person to look at the Coherer article and see if it's ready for approval. It seems like it must be close. Would you mind taking a look? Thanks much. --Joe Quick 12:02, 19 March 2008 (CDT)