Talk:Literature/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell Potter |
imported>Russell Potter No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Thanks also for adding Ibsen, his name should certainly be there! I also would like to ask all editors/authors whether we want to list exemplary authors or texts; they can be so useful for illustrative purposes, but it is possible that we could end up in a long series of edits as users put in (or take out) those writers whom they feel are worthy ... what do you think? | Thanks also for adding Ibsen, his name should certainly be there! I also would like to ask all editors/authors whether we want to list exemplary authors or texts; they can be so useful for illustrative purposes, but it is possible that we could end up in a long series of edits as users put in (or take out) those writers whom they feel are worthy ... what do you think? | ||
BTW, Dionysos is actually the older standard spelling -- I use Robert Graves's ''Greek Myths'' and he spells it thusly -- but I am happy with Dionysus as well if that's the consensus. See the reference entry [http://www.theoi.com/Olympios/Dionysos.html here]. | |||
[[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 18:01, 11 March 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 18:01, 11 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:12, 11 March 2007
OK, let's have at it
After a long (relatively) hiatus, I've decided to return to working on CZ, but just one item at a time -- in this case, the main entry for Literature. While I glanced at the WP entry long enough to see that it was not all that satisfactory, I am writing this entry from scratch. I'd certainly appreciate the advice/collaboration/editing/wikifying skills of any and all CZ folk in this effort. I want this article to read, look, and be an approval-worthy top level entry.
One thing right off the top: I think we need a good image for this page. WP has some old leather books from the Bodleian Library, but I think we could do better. Maybe something like the montage that the Biology writers and editors devised?
I'll be tapping away at this over the next week or so, hoping to get it in general, overall shape.
Russell Potter 12:34, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
Names and usage
Many thanks to John Kenney for raising the question of names.
I'm not committed to any one protocol, but agree we should try to be as consistent as possible. With writers who have chosen a one-name nom-de-plume, such as Molière, there's no first name to use; with some, such as Shakespeare, the author is so well known as not to need one. In a few cases, such as the Brontë sisters or George Eliot/T.S. Eliot a first name is needed to avoid confusion.
I'd suggest that we use only the surname, except in the kinds of cases outlined above -- what do you think?
Thanks also for adding Ibsen, his name should certainly be there! I also would like to ask all editors/authors whether we want to list exemplary authors or texts; they can be so useful for illustrative purposes, but it is possible that we could end up in a long series of edits as users put in (or take out) those writers whom they feel are worthy ... what do you think?
BTW, Dionysos is actually the older standard spelling -- I use Robert Graves's Greek Myths and he spells it thusly -- but I am happy with Dionysus as well if that's the consensus. See the reference entry here.
Russell Potter 18:01, 11 March 2007 (CDT)