Talk:Computer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Tito
mNo edit summary
imported>Robert Tito
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''Copied from the [[CZ:Notice Board]]''
==approval on march 15 2007==
:Is there any objection to put a deepening layer in the [[Computers]] pages? I would suggest the following layer between computers and the final detail pages: [[Computer Science]] [[Science of Computers]] and [[Computer Linguistics and Semantics]] (Generally the first two are distinguished as follows: deployment of science, pure science (theoretical) and logics, linguistics and semantics oriented.
{{ToApprove|editor=Robert Tito|group=Computers|url=http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Computers&oldid=100049305|date=03/15/2007}}
:Thanks.
:Rob
::That sounds fine to me. I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "deepening layer" and breaking computer linguistics /semantics out from the rest of Computer Science is something I'd have to see more about, but overall - sounds great, please get started.  I'll watch this page (with the ''watch'' tab above) and help out where I can. [[User:JesseWeinstein|JesseWeinstein]] 16:08, 24 November 2006 (CST)


== Delete the link between the Computers page to the Computers article ==
== Discussion Area ==


Hello,
following here [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)
 
I am figuring out how to delete the present link between Computers and the file Computers and inserting a choice layer inbetween, containing the proposed diversion of topics.
 
Any help???
 
thanks
Cassiopeia 22:07, 7 December 2006 (CST)[[User:RobertTito|Robert Tito]]

Revision as of 10:22, 3 January 2007

approval on march 15 2007

Toapprove.png
Robert Tito has nominated this version of this article for approval. Other editors may also sign to support approval. The Computers Workgroup is overseeing this approval. Unless this notice is removed, the article will be approved on 03/15/2007.

Discussion Area

following here Robert Tito | Talk 22:37, 10 March 2007 (CST)