Talk:Information: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Greg Woodhouse
(Proper Workgroup?)
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 17: Line 17:


The article begins by talking about information theory, which is a rather specific area of computer science. If this is to be the focus of the article, then I think the Computer workgroup ought to be the primary workgroup. Initially, I thought library science should not be included at all, but I'm open to the idea that it should be included. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 16:34, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
The article begins by talking about information theory, which is a rather specific area of computer science. If this is to be the focus of the article, then I think the Computer workgroup ought to be the primary workgroup. Initially, I thought library science should not be included at all, but I'm open to the idea that it should be included. [[User:Greg Woodhouse|Greg Woodhouse]] 16:34, 22 May 2007 (CDT)
Obviously LIS needs to be included: It's called Library and Information Science, after all.  They are ''the'' experts about information, taken as a general topic. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:07, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:07, 22 May 2007


Article Checklist for "Information"
Workgroup category or categories Library and Information Science Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Matt Mahlmann 17:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

- Versuri 07:42, 2 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.




Advanced status, some progress has been made since the stub status assigned (now over 450 words) Matt Mahlmann 17:04, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Proper Workgroup?

The article begins by talking about information theory, which is a rather specific area of computer science. If this is to be the focus of the article, then I think the Computer workgroup ought to be the primary workgroup. Initially, I thought library science should not be included at all, but I'm open to the idea that it should be included. Greg Woodhouse 16:34, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

Obviously LIS needs to be included: It's called Library and Information Science, after all. They are the experts about information, taken as a general topic. --Larry Sanger 17:07, 22 May 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Information&oldid=183363"