User talk:Robert Rubin: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell Potter (Welcome!) |
imported>Russell Potter (Literature article to be featured) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Robert -- welcome!! Very glad to see you've made it in the door. I just now noticed (and posted a response to) your item on the forums -- but let's, by all means, carry on the talk on the [[Talk:Literature]] page. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 13:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT) | Robert -- welcome!! Very glad to see you've made it in the door. I just now noticed (and posted a response to) your item on the forums -- but let's, by all means, carry on the talk on the [[Talk:Literature]] page. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 13:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Literature article to be featured == | |||
Hi Robert, | |||
I hear that the toplevel Literature article may soon be featured as a "developed" article (see notes on Talk page) -- this could help give us a boost, as Editors in other field will be be needed if we're to get it through the approval process. | |||
I think it looks very good, but the ending seems to just taper off -- maybe we can do something to give it a more 'finished' feel, and perhaps enrich the biliography as well. I've thought about a 'further resources' section as well, but perhaps that can wait a bit .... also if we could find a couple of additional public-domain imaes that fit, that would be great. Many thanks for your work so far, and I hope we can keep this momentum going! cheers, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 06:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 05:48, 3 May 2007
Robert -- welcome!! Very glad to see you've made it in the door. I just now noticed (and posted a response to) your item on the forums -- but let's, by all means, carry on the talk on the Talk:Literature page. Russell Potter 13:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Literature article to be featured
Hi Robert,
I hear that the toplevel Literature article may soon be featured as a "developed" article (see notes on Talk page) -- this could help give us a boost, as Editors in other field will be be needed if we're to get it through the approval process.
I think it looks very good, but the ending seems to just taper off -- maybe we can do something to give it a more 'finished' feel, and perhaps enrich the biliography as well. I've thought about a 'further resources' section as well, but perhaps that can wait a bit .... also if we could find a couple of additional public-domain imaes that fit, that would be great. Many thanks for your work so far, and I hope we can keep this momentum going! cheers, Russell Potter 06:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT)