CZ Talk:New Workgroup Requests/Sweeney: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Anton Sweeney (Reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is an interesting exercise. With regard to wheat you need to consider that it is a model system for basic research. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 10:44, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | This is an interesting exercise. With regard to wheat you need to consider that it is a model system for basic research. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 10:44, 9 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Did you mean to have animal kingdom as a new workgroup? If you look in the forums we had discussed a ''tree of life'' subgroup of biology. The main reason is not to attempt such a huge project but to come up with naming conventions. For example, common names vs binomial names, which one is less confusing? I'll try and find the link to that discussion. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 09:49, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | :Did you mean to have animal kingdom as a new workgroup? If you look in the forums we had discussed a ''tree of life'' subgroup of biology. The main reason is not to attempt such a huge project but to come up with naming conventions. For example, common names vs binomial names, which one is less confusing? I'll try and find the link to that discussion. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 09:49, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Hi Chris. Thanks for the input - most welcome. Yes, I'd intended Animal Kingdom as a subgroup of Natural Science. Hadn't seen the biology forum discussion. This sandbox page is still ''very'' much a work in progress and my rambling thoughts as I look at the issue, per [[CZ Talk:New Workgroup Requests]] and before I post anything up there as a subpage. Regards, [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 10:11, 10 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:11, 10 August 2007
This is an interesting exercise. With regard to wheat you need to consider that it is a model system for basic research. Chris Day (talk) 10:44, 9 August 2007 (CDT)
- Did you mean to have animal kingdom as a new workgroup? If you look in the forums we had discussed a tree of life subgroup of biology. The main reason is not to attempt such a huge project but to come up with naming conventions. For example, common names vs binomial names, which one is less confusing? I'll try and find the link to that discussion. Chris Day (talk) 09:49, 10 August 2007 (CDT)
- Hi Chris. Thanks for the input - most welcome. Yes, I'd intended Animal Kingdom as a subgroup of Natural Science. Hadn't seen the biology forum discussion. This sandbox page is still very much a work in progress and my rambling thoughts as I look at the issue, per CZ Talk:New Workgroup Requests and before I post anything up there as a subpage. Regards, Anton Sweeney 10:11, 10 August 2007 (CDT)